User talk:Lycurgus
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
{{NoACEMM}}
Main activity here [https://eg.meansofproduction.biz/eg/index.php/temporality 64 — 71] image caption links a recap clip
Man is evolving to a being qua intellect but most of them have not reached the developmental milestone of overcoming culturally predetermined irrationality. The vast majority are Talking Animals, parroting tired cultural scripts even if they have attained some level of education and still accept a faith, mysticism, or revelation based fundament and reject finding out as a basis, fail to know they need what post-critcality reaches for, or most commonly assert none at all, the base of the Talking Animal epitet. But this milestone is overdue and imminent, a sudden end to the havoc an immature animal with powerful cognitive abilities wreaks and epoch of an intelligent lifeform per se, one capable of consciously creating culture rather than acting as an uncritical organ of its reproduction.Such an overwhelming and egregious wrong, requiring nothing more than a [https://juan.ai-integration.biz/everything/index.pl?node=Ko successful moment of self-examination], is I believe, bound to be made right as indeed a relatively near moment rather than after a centuries more long death process or never.Non-believers already majorities in China, France, Japan, Sweden, etc. with precipitous rates of decline in higher IQ countries and younger cohorts."The criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism." - Marx
[https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/intro.htm Critique of Hegel]
Also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LynnHarveyNyborg-CountryBelieveGod-Intelligence.svg this] from '09; intend to contrast with 'n9 data to show the process. The process actually began in the middle of the first millennium BCE with reactions to the old superstitions in new and consolidated forms. Ultimately a general reform of belief must relegate all religion to vessel of culture and leave systems of belief to reality based ones. An analogy to the toddler that doesn't yet understand the image in the mirror is herself is more or less cogent.[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461833 A longitudinal study of the emerging self from 9 months to the age of 4 years] Being aware of reality is definitional for intelligent life, a destination of evolution to it, and the right of all, the current tragic situation of a majority of backward individuals and groups at scale and their corrupt or misnamed leadership notwithstanding.
Lycurgus 4723 黄帝紀年 3 月 8 日 03-08-73 CE Sat 14:16:09 UTC
- Best email contact is juan@ ~.org, visible in my wiki.
- Whole article creation [https://eg.meansofproduction.biz/eg/index.php/Antireligion there]. Here, maintenance of my userspace, commentary, and the odd ip mainspace typo or grammar fix.
- [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7WF5gzPG1k Why and how consciousness arises] . Although distinct from it, with cortical activity, consciousness is the material base of intelligence which is the supreme form of life. The control of culture I allude to above I hold to be the culmination of metasystem transition. 'Contemporary Perspectives' there is in my estimation, basically a ramified category error.
- I would have deleted the file below if had permission. In such cases please take whatever action you think fit.
[https://pageviews.toolforge.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=User_talk:Lycurgus n]
[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:Lycurgusselfie.jpg]]
The file :File:Lycurgusselfie.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused personal photo
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Are you planning to fix your User page's syntax errors yourself?
Regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lycurgus&diff=next&oldid=1181864064 this revert], made without an edit summary: you reverted fixes that eliminated two syntax errors on your User page. Do you have a plan to fix those errors yourself? If not, I or some other gnome will eventually come along and repeat the edit. Do you need help understanding why I applied those routine fixes to your user page? – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
:Do you need help reading and understanding English? If you persist in vandalizing my user pages I will take it to arbitration. Also are you blind? Can't you see the parameter these edits were trynna add were already there? Lycurgus (talk) 20:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
::Please assume good faith, as I did above, and refrain from personal attacks. The thumb option was already present in the relevant File: call, which caused your page to appear on the Linter error list (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lycurgus&action=info#Lint_errors the Lint errors section] of Page information for your User page), so I removed the extra, non-working option. I also removed a stray closing {{tag|center|c}} tag that was not matched with an opening tag. Your revert restored those two errors to the page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
::OK, I don't see a problem but please stop. Editing other ppls usr pages is creepy, like picking somebody else's boogers oder. I'm not active in main space and not ready for this yet on a personal basis, if the bot doesn error which I'm unclear if it did or not, is OK igess. I removed the stray center after the revert. Lycurgus (talk) 08:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
{{OD}}
In terms of the Big 5 I have a strong streak of Neuroticism, but Openness is dominant so ima redact the above and trust that the automation will prevent vandalism and bot runners will be expressing the conscientiousness trait. I'm OK with constructive edits. Lycurgus (talk) 06:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this [https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/962595?lang=en anonymous survey].
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
:
:Since I stopped editing mainspace here some time ago and never was an admin didn do this. Lycurgus (talk) 12:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey [https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/962595?lang=en here].
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
:Didn opt out of msg delivery till this one. Lycurgus (talk) 20:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)