User talk:Materialscientist#Since you blocked

Hi, why did you delete my page? I made a real page and did not mean to do any vandalism. This is a real delivery driver for Uber Eats.

Hi i dont know whats your Problem not every Source is from the internet first of all im by myself from Skorobiste and my sources are books and informations from the archive Historia e Shkolles Skorobishte, and Monografia Skorobište all i write is true and all those people names are ancestors of some families in skorobista, and its true that the most families are of albanian origin, qlso the facts about 1958 1966 after the world war 2 are true all those names of people who are killed are facts! so i dont understand what for source you need? and why you have to delete informations?

doesn't [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nothing&oldid=24330041 this] qualify for a ban instead of block? UnsungHistory (Questions?) (Did I mess up?) 18:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

:Not sure what you mean. If you mean {{user|Hellocat99}} then my answer is block, certainly. Materialscientist (talk) 00:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I mean IP user 209.250.175.169,not Hellocat99,unless you suspect Hellocat99 to be the account of 209.250.175.169? UnsungHistory (Questions?) (Did I mess up?) 18:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

:::https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BlockList?wpTarget=209.250.175.169&blockType=&limit=50&wpFormIdentifier=blocklist UnsungHistory (Questions?) (Did I mess up?) 19:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

::::Thanks. Same answer, unfortunately. Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

You mean 209.250.175.169 and Hellocat99 are the same person? UnsungHistory (Questions?) (Did I mess up?) 00:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

:The IP and Hellocat99 are not the same user. The ip 209.250.175.169 operates on Oakville, Ontario. Hellocat99's IP is 135.26.120.92, which is based in Conroe, Texas. I know this because both the ip and accounts add racist, antisemitic, and homophobic slurs on multiple semi-protected pages since 8/3/23. See https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/135.26.120.92 for more information. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:5D63:1DB:6CFA:DC82 (talk) 23:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

What did We Ever do Leo7510 (talk) 06:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

:{{tps}} It would help if you gave us the article (we have several articles under "Christ College" and even more "Christ's College"). If you mean that Materialscientist blocked an IP from the college then give us the IP. Meters (talk) 06:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

::he has blocked the school christs college in nz from editing wikipedia Leo7510 (talk) 21:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

::I believe it's User talk:114.23.26.225.

::@Leo7510, the IP ban is listed as being issued for vandalism. This ban only applies to the IP address - not user accounts - and expires in 3 years. Synorem (talk) 20:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Kaushal Kishore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dab page with only two entries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Boron has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

{{talkback|User talk:Cooperaterrill|Block Appeal|ts=20:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)}}

BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 20:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

{{talkback|User talk:Uros003|ts=18:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)}}

Courtesy note for an unblocking of a very old block. Cheers. asilvering (talk) 18:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

:Thanks. Unblocking is Ok with me. Materialscientist (talk) 13:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

could you perhaps look into what has gone on at the Enneagram of Personality page today, primarily in its History section? (Asking because in an earlier season, I was impressed by your work in various contexts.) We believe that the carte blanche reversion was too easy of a response, and threw baby out with the bath. We have no opinion on larger matters at that article—we simply found gross misuse of sources, and rampant WP:OR. We are now accused of editorialising, and of OR ourselves, which simply staggers us.

We won't further egage the reverting editor, as we see no point. But the article is not better for having been returned to its earlier state.

[To start, look for the quoted word "remedies" in the Wiltse citation (you will not find it, to aid that, here is a [https://www.narrativeenneagram.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Hidden-in-Plain-Sight-Helen-Palmer-1.pdf URL for that], which was lacking in the article), and then look to see if the citation of the "Brandon Medina" blog (actually by author = Medina, Brandon) does not point to a source that states the opposite of what the reverted article now again suggests. And the scholarly unraveling goes on from there.]

It is our view that the original edit, which was accepted by a registered editor—the article is protected, we do not know whom—should have been allowed to stand, and not reverted by a single editor objecting to the two of us. We suspect bias against us as a non-registered editor.

Surely, some editing of the product should follow. But reversion, so the errors that existed before our edit be returned—we suggest that pursuing that course was the poorest of options, for the sake of a quality article. The edits were not vandalism, were not editorial, and were not WP:OR (as claimed in the all too brief reverting edit summary). Cheers. 71.239.132.212 (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=Doug Weller talk 11:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)}}

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :Sizo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

:::*disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);

:::* disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or

:::*is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

You semi-protected Lil Dicky back in 2019. Now that five years have passed, would you consider lifting the semi-protection? 174.93.89.27 (talk) 17:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

:I do not agree 2603:8080:D03:89D4:8017:75ED:C03C:6633 (talk) 19:12, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Material, merry Christmas! Could you maybe do a rangeblock that covers the IPv6's at Talk:Datta dynasty? It's getting ridiculous, and I started listing the /64's that would be needed to stop it (since that is the limit of my understanding of IPv6 ranges), but gave up. Perhaps a long page-block of a much bigger range would be the best? Bishonen | tålk 04:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC).

:I have blocked a short range, ping me if they resume. That region is notorious for their vast floating IP ranges. Materialscientist (talk) 14:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

::Thank you. Bishonen | tålk 03:08, 25 December 2024 (UTC).

Hello. I have been attempting to get Kencf0618 on board with our Manual of Style guidance regarding the use of dashes for 3 weeks now, and no matter how many times they tell me they're "chagrined" (1st and 2nd thread), they continue to misuse them and even replace good dashes with bad ones. I have asked nicely, asked less nicely and issued a direct warning that their continued misuse effectively constitutes vandalism (willfully editing contrary to consensus), but checking if the "sorry" in response to my final warning had meant anything useful, I found it had not. A week after first discussing this with them, and being told that they'd fix their previous errors, I regex searched for their most common pattern, and put a decent amount of time into [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Fred+Gandt&namespace=0&tagfilter=&start=2024-12-16&start=2024-12-16&end=2024-12-17&end=2024-12-17&limit=100 correcting the many I found], but I was playing catch-up. I won't follow this editor around indefinitely fixing every case, so they need to be stopped, but I also recognise that this ignorance isn't blatantly malicious (they do enjoy inserting inappropriate flowery phrases here and there though, when plain English would have been obviously preferable) and they just need to be put straight by someone with some clout, since my efforts have fallen on deaf ears. Hopefully this is enough information for you to make sense of the situation, but please ask for clarification if needed. Thank you. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 09:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

:Shall learn regex. kencf0618 (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, yesterday you warned {{User links|2600:4809:7270:F800:B974:A7C9:5E41:9A03}} that they would be blocked the next time they removed content. They have ignored that warning and continue to remove pronunciations, some of them obviously necessary like Gervis. Today's batch of edits are under the IP {{User links|2600:4809:7270:F800:F083:671:4921:D5B8}}. Can you do something to stop this waste of time for other editors? Thanks! CodeTalker (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Good day Materialscientist! Back in 2021, you moved Oshana Region to Oshana, undoing a 2009 page move. I cannot find any discussion about this. I would like to undo this, as a) all other regions of Namibia end in "Region", b) its name is so defined by the Government of Namibia, and c) "Oshana" means something on its own: it is a shallow flood plain after which the region is named. Please protest if you're not happy with this move. --Pgallert (talk) 07:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

• {{Done}} --Pgallert (talk) 11:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi -- just wanted to thank you for all your work being on the ball reverting junk/vandalism from talk pages, it's really helpful to prevent this stuff from being archived and sticking around forever. Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. --2806:10A6:10:159A:2CD2:6980:24FF:D548 (talk) 18:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Materialscientist, I hope you are having a happy new year? An update template has just appeared on my userpage, and I have no idea of what update is needed, or of how to remove the template. I am not a techie - all my formatting has been learned by copying and pasting the formatting done by others, so that little trick won't work here. So please help? Thanks. Storye book (talk) 10:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

: Update. The issue appears to have resolved itself. Apologies if this request wasted your time. Storye book (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

30px

The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leonid_Ilyichev&redirect=no Leonid Ilyichev] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 7#Leonid Ilyichev}} until a consensus is reached. CitrusHemlock 17:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Materialscientist, your image of curium that you have uploaded, is non free and I found these 3 images from Commons:

{{image array|perrow = 4

| image1 = Curium (Element - 96) 1.jpg| caption1 =

| image2 =Curium (Element - 96) 2.jpg | caption2 =

| image3 = Curium (Element - 96) 3.jpg| caption3 =

| image4 = | caption4 =

| image5 = | caption5 =

| image6 = | caption6 =

| image7 = | caption7 =

| image8 = | caption8 =

| image9 = | caption9 =

| image10 = | caption10 =

| image11 = | caption11 =

| image12 = | caption12 =

| image13 = | caption13 =

| image14 = | caption14 =

| image15 = | caption15 =

| image16 = | caption16 =

}} Is it okay if I replace the non free photo of curium with one of those 3 pictures that I found in Commons? Vitaium (talk) 09:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

:[https://www.flickr.com/photos/47445767@N05/54040269527/ Elemental curium is a radioactive, silvery-gray metal], and the image shows some white substance. Is it curium? Probably not. Materialscientist (talk) 09:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

::In the Commons description, it says it is a real picture Vitaium (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

:::It is copied from Flickr, and Flickr is not a reliable source. Uploaders can write there virtually anything. I guess it is a curium salt, and the uploader could figure out which one by looking around the place where he took the photo, or by talking to the facility staff. Materialscientist (talk) 10:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

A user is appealing a block you issued a few years back at User talk:Dgetahun473. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

:Unblocking Dgetahun473 is Ok with me. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 00:50, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

{{You've got mail|dashlesssig=Doug Weller talk 14:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)}}

{{noping|92.31.207.10}} is an evader, decade+ if I recall. DMacks (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, just wanted to let you know that [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/45.117.206.209 the IP you reverted] now has [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dr._ujjwal_pandey a registered account.]   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 04:13, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Materialscientist. I wonder if you could re-upload this formerly deleted by you article (15:27, 9 November 2021 Materialscientist talk contribs deleted page Erna Andersen (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Sander.v.Ginkel) in violation of ban or block) with wikidata-ID: {{Q|89573046}}, <-- are updated ) to my user-subpage, (User:Migrant/Erna Andersen) for a possible later re-entry after finding possible new sources (don't know what the deleted article had of sources) and correcting up the birth and deathdate. See this In memoriam here http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-nb_digavis_nordisktidende_null_null_19920528_102_21_1 at page 15, where she is named as Erna Andersen Arnold. (text is in english-american). Best regards Migrant (talk – contribs) 17:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

:Done. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for the re-upload to my user-space and for the heads-up on the image. I am looking into it, there are several pictures to view around the internet. My first idea of who it can be if it's not Erna Andersen, then it might be [https://www.olympedia.org/athletes/82387 Karen Simensen (Klæboe)] (Olympedia-profile with picture), who also competed for the same figure and speed skating club Oslo SK. I will anyway, when i'm ready, post an article on my home wikipedia (wp:no). Best regards Migrant (talk – contribs) 00:39, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to :User talk:ClueBot NG has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qrstw talk contribs 14:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I came here to post a message saying "I know it was a long time ago, but why on earth did you do [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datla&diff=next&oldid=1144002178 this]? When I got here I saw the message above. Both of these are clearly cases of acting without adequate care. Heaven knows that I have done similar things myself, and worse, but over the years I have built up an impression that you do it disproportionately often, compared to most editors. It seems to me that your prodigious edit count (close to 2 million) is to a large extent achieved by hasty actions without spending the necessary time to check properly before taking action. I don't suppose I have much chance of persuading you to slow down and take more care, but perhaps you may consider it. JBW (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:{{replyto|JBW}} Materialscientist likely believed that the user was deleting content under the pretext of "removing troll content", as many unregistered and new users make their edits seem like something they are not (an example would be the "fixed typo" edit summary). Materialscientist might have figured that eventually, users will cite reliable sources that will be verified later, because the header message on the edit screen says so. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Can you please block 36.71.136.0/21? They have changed launch dates, added false information, and overly worded with bad grammar. Scoophole2021 (talk). 09:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

:{{replyto|Scoophole2021}} Please report that user at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, if it is vandalism or other obvious disruptive editing, or Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/incidents, if it is not specifically about obvious disruptive editing. Z. Patterson (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Optical properties of carbon nanotubes has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for blocking 2601:243:C002:A780::/64. Could you also block 2601:243:C003:C3D0::/64? Almost certainly the same person. The C003:C3D0 IP was particularly active during the six-month block of the C002:A780 IP. Lots of warnings (e.g. September 2024, October 2024, February 2025), zero effect. — Chrisahn (talk) 17:46, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

:{{replyto|Chrisahn}} JBW blocked 2601:243:C003:C3D0:0:0:0:0/64. Thank you. Z. Patterson (talk) 00:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks! — Chrisahn (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I am updating and creating pages for Nebraska elections. I started to create a page for the 2015 Lincoln, Nebraska mayoral election but saw the alert that a previous page had been deleted in 2021 because it had been created by a banned/blocked user and that I should message you first -- so I am doing that! Is there anything I need to do?

PA Uploader (talk) 04:32, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, just a courtesy call to check if you've any objections to unblocking Crexpl? Time appears to have worked its magic, as their appeal at User_talk:Crexpl#Account_Unblock_Appeal comes across as genuinely remorseful. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

:No objections. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks, I'll go unblock them. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

In 2022 you uploaded a cover image for the Beatles' "Golden Slumbers". :File:Golden Slumbers vinyl cover.jpg.

The source of the image, a discogs release (https://www.discogs.com/release/10919566-The-Beatles-Golden-Slumbers), is an unofficial release not done by Apple Records or Northern Songs which was listed in the rationale, instead by an obscure label who briefly made unofficial Beatles releases in 1986. As a result, the actual Northern Songs sheet music cover for "Golden Slumbers" was deleted. The image you uploaded should be deleted with the real Northern Songs sheet music image added back into the article’s infobox. Spinmeisters (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Christiaan van Velzen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LibStar (talk) 22:50, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, you deleted this page awhile back with the reason G5. I'm not sure what that means, but I'm reaching out as I'd like to create this article. If there is an objection to me making a new page, please let me know. Thanks so much.

This is what I know about what was done back then:

11:29, 10 November 2021 Materialscientist talk contribs deleted page Annie Steiner (G5)

Many thanks Nayyn (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

You page protected the Ellen Pompeo article two years ago. Would you be willing to consider removing the protection? 174.88.141.200 (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

I notice that you have reverted my edit on the PAVN arm badges. I would like you to undo that. This is because these images are wrong information (according to official description of Vietnamese MOD). Also, if you want source on that, here it ishttps://mod.gov.vn/en/intro/detail/!ut/p/z1/zVJNc4MgEP0tOeS4AypEOZpDm8l0Om2aL7lkQFBpFLWxpv33Jckll5j2VjiwC7v7lvcWcbRF3Ire5KIztRWl8xM-2T3Ez4to6sUYL598_Dola8pYGBAWos1QwOM8QPw3-fjGivG9_DXiiKe2a7oCJVWtxvggwJ2g7ZUJfSPO7sWEtDClur6oMjD2YHL4tCarP6rzW6us6i20-7ZoG2iLMVaep0KJU1DEV0D8CQahfAJahkxK7Uspo1NDTWoUSiKqqMiUBl9QAWSSBsCEooBp5jbxGNN0mMDTD_kwP5sT3kCFWTgccNboHkjimgxvQrwEaNMbfUQr66hzU_P2Rw5mGM0Rz8taXkbOvLctj52ute30V4e2_0PYplqtqij4hv0iOi6zosxHox-luh6m/. 2001:EE0:4141:81C2:651A:1037:52CE:8B0E (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Anohni won the Mercury Prize because she is a British national, as stated on this wiki page. It is therefore confusing to reiterate that the band is "American" in light of this. Some of the musicians are American, and Anohni is British by birth, as stated on her wiki bio page. It could be said that the band was formed in New York City, but to say that it is an "American band" is factually vague in a way that conflicts with other info in wiki and the narrative of this album as having been originated by a British person.

The record cover for this album has the complete credits for the musicians and it is revisionist to claim Joan Wasser was a guest when she was a touring member of the band for years. The guest artists on the album (Boy George, Lou Reed, Devendra Banhart, Rufus Wainwright) were all guest vocalists who featured on a single track. Joan Wasser played across the whole album as part of the string ensemble. Doug Henderson's role as mixer, and the credits of the other musicians have been arbitrarily divided in this living. The band members (those who toured with the band) should be listed as such, and other contributors (including the principle mixer and mastered Doug Henderson, also credited on the album artwork) should be listed as other contributors. There isn't a source for this except the work itself.

I will try to dig up reference regarding Anohni's relationship with Lou Reed being one forged in adulthood and get back to you on that. 98.13.215.228 (talk) 04:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:https://www.stereogum.com/2233494/anohni-career-spanning-interview/interviews/weve-got-a-file-on-you/

:Here she describes her friendship with Lou Reed which was forged in the early 00s in nyc. The statement that Lou Reed was her childhood hero is unsubstantiated and that is why i took it down. there is no documentation that i can find to support that idea. Anohni was a fan of 80s UK pop and electro as stated on her wiki bio page. The contributor stating that Lou was a childhood hero needs to be either substantiated or removed. There is already reference for her childhood heroes in her bio. Reed isnt one of them. Thanks. 98.13.215.228 (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

::the band's wiki page has a complete list of members, which includes Kindred and Wasser.

::Anohni and the Johnsons

::The engineer Doug Henderson's site also lists his credit as the principle mixer and mastered of the album

::http://micro-moose-berlin.blogspot.com/ 98.13.215.228 (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for the block there, but it looks like the the /64 has been active since January (it's the same person; I know this abuse case well), so a block of a few months on the /64 might be wise. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:I might request a global block there, actually. Graham87 (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:: ... which was enacted. Graham87 (talk) 01:51, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

= Hasty reversion of good-faith edits =

Hi there! I realize you may not see this as you have notifications turned off for this page, but I'm hoping you will.

Last night, I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Bearchell&diff=prev&oldid=1285000848 edited] Chris Bearchell's article to add a redlink to Maggie's, a notable Toronto-based sex worker rights advocacy organization that I hope to draft an article for in the near future. There is already an article on Wikipedia called Maggie's that refers to another organization, so I created the redlink for "Maggie's Toronto", which I believed to be the organization's full name. A subsequent web search showed me that the full name is in fact Maggie's Toronto Sex Workers Action Project, so I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Bearchell&diff=prev&oldid=1285000998 edited] the page again to change the link accordingly.

You [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chris_Bearchell&diff=prev&oldid=1285001114 reverted] both of my edits and then [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MidnightAlarm&diff=prev&oldid=1285001119 posted on my talk page] that the edits were not constructive. Within one minute, you then undid both of those changes - the reversion and the addition to my talk page - which I do really appreciate. I am guessing that you took another look at Chris Bearchell's article and realized my addition of the redlink was in good faith, as Chris Bearchell was a sex worker rights activist who co-founded Maggie's.

I don't want it to sound like I'm berating you for an honest mistake that was quickly amended, but I would like to ask you to take care when assessing edits with the word "sex worker" in them and not jump to the conclusion that they are vandalism. I realize my Wikipedia account is new, but I had another account in the past that I ultimately deleted because almost every time I made a good-faith edit related to women or LGBTQ-adjacent topics, it was reverted, and I became so frustrated with this and other examples of systemic bias on Wikipedia that I gave up on it entirely for more than a decade. I decided to create this account and give editing Wikipedia another shot when I learned about projects like Women in Red, and I recently attended an edit-a-thon that emboldened me to start creating my own articles and adding redlinks to other articles when I have genuine reason to believe the subjects of the links are notable. But when I tried to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_ArQuives&diff=prev&oldid=1284501822 add a few redlinks] to an article after that edit-a-thon, the edit was quickly [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_ArQuives&diff=prev&oldid=1284516224 reverted] with no reason provided, and now, although you did correct your error, I've received a notification that it's happened again.

I don't think it's a coincidence that the redlinks I added in both instances were related to LGBTQ activism, AIDS activism, and sex worker rights activism, so I just ask that you please not be hasty in assuming that an edit related to topics like these is unconstructive or not made in good faith. And thank you again for catching your error and undoing it; I really appreciate it. MidnightAlarm (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Over here, you blocked this user just as I was giving them a level 2 warning. Funny how these things coincide, eh? JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

I added the unofficial anthem (Die Wacht am Rhein) to the page because the lack of the audio file bothered me, If i was not meant to add the unofficial anthem's audio file then i'm sorry. Fuldeco (talk) 15:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

ive come to make ann annoincement to you for advise i made the page called, i cant say whwt itwas because when i did it banned me from saying it and send me soemwhere else. ok the page wws about a lego islannd song by s188. so ok thanks for delwting it becauae it was just a test but i have a few questions for you, number one. are you a real scientist like your name. that would be cool number two. if i make a seocond page do you have any advise to me. its not gonma be about lefo island again and i will not gonna swear in it. number three. have a good dayw bBig mcthankies 2604:2D80:E701:3A00:2108:C1AE:66B7:126F (talk) 00:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

i was literally fixing grammar. how is that not constructive?! 50.204.195.231 (talk) 17:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

{{The Admin's Barnstar|For taking care of that grossly racist vandalism. I appreciate it! JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)}}

Hello, you left a message on my page: "Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C5%81ubki-Kolonia&diff=1287747968 this edit] to Łubki-Kolonia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia"

However my information did come from and cited a source.

Would you be able to revert my changes?

Here it is:https://www.citypopulation.de/en/poland/localities/lubelski/wojciech%C3%B3w/0393689__%C5%82ubki_kolonia/ Alyeth4 (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Materialscientist ,

I noticed that you recently made an edit to this [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sufmi%20Dasco%20Ahmad Page] by adding a new section titled "Personal Life". Unfortunately, these details lack credible sources and have the potential to mislead readers.

Currently, the page is protected, so I kindly request that you revert the changes, remove the "Personal Life" section, and also remove any family-related information listed under personal details, as these details are currently without valid sources.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards,

Hey, in 2023, you blocked this range for a year as a schoolblock; it's assigned to the Beaumont Independent School District. They appeared on my watchlist today and I discovered that in the year or so since the expiry of their block, they've made 25 edits, about 20 of which have been reverted. Do you think this is severe enough to warrant re-blocking? I'm ... on the fence here; before the mess that led to me losing my adminship, I would have definitely re-blocked that range; now I'm not sure what I'd do if I were still an admin with full block powers. Some of their edits were OK, like this edit to their school district which I verified as correct. Also, while reviewing edits by that range, I came across a user with the username ShawConsulting, who made promotional edits in 2022 (which have since been cleaned up); I don't think a block is warranted because of the length of time since their last edit, but the blatantness of what they did is striking (but all too predictable) ... so I'll leave that up to you as well. Graham87 (talk) 05:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks for re-blocking the IP range. Graham87 (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

It looks like ORNL made a higher-res copy available on Flickr, which I've retouched slightly [https://ibb.co/m1ZywyC here]. Would you like to overwrite the file? JayCubby 02:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:Fine. I would upload the original, then crop the retouched version, and remove the timestamp. Can do that if you wish. Materialscientist (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks a ton., and congratulations on your two-millionth edit!JayCubby 03:09, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

I think your mass reverts on my edits are not justified. You may find an edit or two which with you disagree with, but most are based on policy. 130.234.110.113 (talk) 08:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:The fact that you've turned off pings makes this even more destructive, as you won't even hear the justifications if I start discussions at appropriate places. Do I have to take this to ANI or what is the way to deal with this? Any talk page lurkers around? 130.234.110.113 (talk) 08:18, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:As far as I can tell, you've done the reverts without looking what you're reverting. Example diffs:

:# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harald_Granraude&diff=prev&oldid=1279258528 Harald_Granraude] I added a short description fully consistent with the introductory sentence of the article. Why revert that?

:# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lumo&diff=prev&oldid=1278591194 Lumo]: I removed a dab link not supported by the article.

:# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Raman_scattering&diff=prev&oldid=1278597883 Raman scattering]: I added a series of books devoted to light-matter interactions as further reading. Much of the series deals with Raman scattering and it is also quite notable as a series. For example, take a look at the reference list at https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.79.175 and you can find multiple references to different volumes of these books.

:# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Finnish_Blood_Swedish_Heart&diff=prev&oldid=1276530831 Finnish Blood Swedish Heart]: I capitalized the ethnonym Finn. In English ethnonyms are capitalized.

:# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pauli_equation&diff=prev&oldid=1274302440 Pauli equation]: there was a very long equation here, which I broke to multiple lines to make it readable on smaller screens.

:# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=S%C3%B8ren_Norby&diff=1281422735&oldid=1277732605 Søren Norby]: changed "selfstyled" to "self-styled" and added a missing comma.

:# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Negative_temperature&diff=prev&oldid=1281611607 Negative temperature]: Here I had restored the direct quotation as it reads in the source, but you reverted that.

:# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Wellesley&diff=prev&oldid=1281641014 George Wellesley]: Here I removed piping to Suomenlinna, since there is a dedicated article about the battle. This is also consistent with WP:EASTEREGG.

:And the list goes on. 130.234.110.113 (talk) 14:04, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks, that was a misclick on mass rollback. I've reverted myself. No need for the Cardona's book link on Raman - I knew him and understand your point, but we need article content rather than a list of offline sources. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Thanks, but you reverted many more edits than I care to manually list here. If I've misinterpreted e.g. MOS:PLACE or WP:PLACENAME#Finland, then let's discuss those, but otherwise please revert also the rest of the reverts at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/130.234.110.113&target=130.234.110.113&offset=20250403064019&limit=500 my edit history]. Almost no one else had a problem with those edits, so 99% of the reverts are yours. Fine with Cardona{{emdash}}while I don't necessary agree that we should only list online sources (the distinction is getting blurred anyway with pdf reprints etc), a textbook would be infinitely more useful as an introduction to the topic. Cheers, the same IP as above. 130.234.242.178 (talk) 14:54, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Since you seem to have moved on with your editing, I will restore the edits myself. Let me know here if there are some specific problems with them, and I'll be happy to discuss. 130.234.240.119 (talk) 08:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Please stop doing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maria_Euphrosyne_of_Zweibr%C3%BCcken&diff=prev&oldid=1288381540 this] which creates a fantasy of your own unsupported by any reliable source. Some of the Swedish kings had double names and have never been mentioned anywhere reliable in any other way. This has been an accepted fact for centuries. I will try to fix some of the damage you are doing with this, making English Wikipedia look ridiculous. Perhaps you'd like to make sure to fix all of it? SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

PS I don't doubt WP:FAITH, here but would have thought you'd initiate a move request at Charles X Gustav rather than just going at his name all over. Sorry if you found my flabberghastion rude. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Why did you removed message from Tati Gabrielle talk page? I think it is stictly restricted to edit a discussion topic until consesus. 117.237.4.82 (talk) 09:57, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

:My bad. Restored, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:01, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

::No problem. Good day. 117.237.4.82 (talk) 11:31, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

::Hey, since you are there, can you help me with this guy. He is reverting my edits about Tati being portrayed as ND video game character. Actually source was cited and he just says its "unconstructive". I just don't know why it seems nonconstructive. Maybe he meant that adding it in intro might be Un.... but I think that's the goal of the Intro? To sum up all, especially the Biography articles. I will appreciate if you dropped your opinion. 117.237.4.82 (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

::Dude, Fish Hooks did not premiere on Disney channel in November 30, 2009, why are you adding false information. 2601:249:8B82:F560:D087:CDD9:B1E1:6154 (talk) 12:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Beg you pardon? 152.59.187.139 (talk) 13:40, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

I just want to ask why you undo my edit and you write reason"HG 3.4.13".I can't understand what is it mean. Xaero1362 (talk) 11:51, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

:sorry for responding other people question, but HG means Huggle, a kind of tool that automatically removes vandalism or good faith edits. I myself don't know about '3.4.13' but can guess it might be one of the versions of Huggle. Also "was born (date) in" is unnecessary edit when orginal edit was "(born (date))". Huggle was actually correct. It seems you were just testing editing. 152.59.187.139 (talk) 12:00, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm confused about the edits to Korapuzha.

Copypatrol flagged [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1288913496 this edit] as a possible copyright issue.

I looked and saw substantial overlap with [https://historicalleys.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-kora-puzha-custom.html this site]

I saw [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Korapuzha&diff=1288915347&oldid=1288915264 your edit] reverting the sequence of edits including the problematic one identified.

But your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Korapuzha&diff=next&oldid=1288915347 very next edit] undid your reversion.

I see such a sequence when someone realizes they did something by accident but I'm trying to figure wrote out why you undid you reversion. I checked your talk page and the Talk page of Lord.of.Malabar to see if those sums there was some discussion which would serve light on what happened but I don't see any such discussion.

I don't see a reason why the edit would survive but I'm trying to figure out if I'm missing something. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{u|Sphilbrick}} it was a lot of copyvio, which has now been removed. Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 09:36, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

::That was my assessment but I wanted to hear from the editor who restored it to find out if there was something I'm missing. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

:::I reverted myself (1st revert was in Huggle) so that someone else could have a look at those edits. I had no time to check for copyvious. Should have left a corresponding edit summary, my bad. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2025 (UTC)