User talk:MrFattie#top

Welcome!

Hi MrFattie! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks! MrFattie (talk) 00:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Low taper fade (meme)|Low taper fade (meme)]] (January 15)

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svgYour recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LunaEclipse were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia articleβ€”that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=I would recommend using social media as a source very sparingly. Add a few more reliable sources and you'll be good to go.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

{{clear}}

  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Low taper fade (meme) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Low_taper_fade_(meme) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LunaEclipse&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Low_taper_fade_(meme) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

πŸ’½ πŸŒ™Eclipse πŸ’½ 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 21:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
style="vertical-align: top;"

| alt=Teahouse logo

|

Hello, MrFattie!

Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! πŸ’½ πŸŒ™Eclipse πŸ’½ 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 21:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

Your thread has been archived

style="margin: 1em 4em;"
style="vertical-align: top;"

| File:WP teahouse logo 2.png

|

Hello MrFattie! The thread you created at the Teahouse, {{tq|Can i cite knowyourmeme?}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Can i cite knowyourmeme?}}.

See also the help page about the archival process.

The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). β€”KiranBOT (talk) 03:21, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Low taper fade (meme)|Low taper fade (meme)]] (January 18)

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svgYour recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LunaEclipse were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia articleβ€”that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=WikiHow and YouTube are not reliable sources.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

{{clear}}

  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Low taper fade (meme) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Low_taper_fade_(meme) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LunaEclipse&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Low_taper_fade_(meme) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

πŸ’½ πŸŒ™Eclipse πŸ’½ 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 10:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

style="margin: 1em 4em;"
style="vertical-align: top;"

| File:WP teahouse logo 2.png

|

Hello MrFattie! The thread you created at the Teahouse, {{tq|Is this NPOV?}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Is this NPOV?}}.

See also the help page about the archival process.

The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). β€”KiranBOT (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Low taper fade (meme)]] has been accepted

File:AFC-Logo.svg Low taper fade (meme), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Low_taper_fade_(meme) help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Low taper fade (meme)]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Low taper fade (meme), to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Low_taper_fade_(meme) significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Low taper fade (meme) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Rise of Kingdoms]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Rise of Kingdoms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise of Kingdoms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ A412 talk! 07:51, 28 April 2025 (UTC)