User talk:Nonantum

from the official site, PFQ means Promoted From Qualifier. the PFQ needed to participate the qualification initially, but some players retired from the game, the PFQ who is the highest ranking from the qualify players replaced them in the main draw, so they didn't need to participate the qualification finally.

That's the different from PFQ and Q, but i'm not sure about it:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chevy0193 (talk • contribs) 10:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Boston Go Open, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

:Tournament with no assertion of notability, no third-party sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tl|dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Boston Open, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Boston Open and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Boston Open during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I've removed the current sport template from that article, and you've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=U.S.-Canada_Team_Tournament_(go)&diff=299940009&oldid=299475049 reinserted it]. Could you explain why? Current event templates like this one are not supposed to be used to merely inform our readers that something is "current" (as confusing as it may be), the templates exist to warn our readers of the ensuing chaos when massive editing is going on due to something being current. U.S.-Canada Team Tournament (go) has only been edited twice in the last week, tho, so there's no massive editing going on. --Conti|✉ 22:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box

| quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

| source = Thank you.

| width = 20%

| align = right

}}

A tag has been placed on :Boston Biomedical Research Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tl|hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

{{Quote box

| quote = You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

| source = Thank you.

| width = 20%

| align = right

}}

Image:Ambox warning pn.svgThe article :Online Go Server has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Xu Xiaonian has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Xu Xiaonian|request that it be undeleted|request that it be undeleted}} when you are ready to add one. — Bill william compton^Talk 02:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

----

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.