User talk:Notwisconsin

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catherine Parker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Representative.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, :Liz Truss, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 23:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This is bullshit. Notwisconsin (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|decline=I must admit that I have some difficulty parsing this request (which "first incarnation"? Permission to sock "from a number of high 'muckymucks'"?), but since it neither disputes that sockpuppetry has occured, nor addresses the reason for {{noping|Arglebargle79}}'s block (BLP violations), I am declining it. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2022 (UTC)|1=Your reason here I was blocked the first time unfairly and unjustly. If you look at my last incarnation (and the first one), you will notice that I was blocked for linking parts of a number of articles about what would become the January 6 United States Capitol attack and saying that a riot was being planned. This was a legitimate addition to specific events that had already happened. I also believe that for a short time I had something up in the talk page saying something snarky about then-President Trump, which turned out to be right. Prior to that, I had actually gotten permission to create the previous sockpuppet from a number of high 'muckymucks" in the organization at a conference a number of years ago. I had objected to misinformation about the upcoming 2015 Canadian election. Under the laws at the time, (and apparently, they still apply), the election had to be called by a certain date, and they refused to believe it, assuming that the minority government of the time would vote to extend the length of the parliament's term, which didn't happen. A week after I was blocked for insisting that the election would be called in 2015, it was. The reason that I was blocked was due to my so-called arrogance. How was saying that a democratic government would obey the law arrogant? Also, why was it wrong to say that a major historical event, that was being broadcast all over the internet, was misinformation? I humbly ask: could you please unblock me? Notwisconsin (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)}}