User talk:Pamputt
Welcome!
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
les egalites plus egales que les autres
Salut Pamputt - see Table_of_mathematical_symbols and search for "definition". The reason is that this is a definition. It can't be proved or disproved, it's just a matter of convention. J'ai commence recemment d'utiliser plutot :=, puisque celui-la a l'air d'etre couramment utilise, et afin d'eviter l'ambiguite avec l'equivalence. Toutes les notions d'egalite ne sont pas egales, mais une relation d'ordre entre elles n'existe sans doute pas. :P Boud (talk) 10:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
[[Ahtna language]]
Hello, you added in Ahtna language article comparisons between Ahtna words and the same words in other close language. I modified the apostrophe because before you have used this one ‘ and I put typographic apostrophe ’. I think it is correct now. If I am wrong, could you give me a source which confirm the old apostrophe? Thanks. Pamputt (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
:Hello, thanks. The Ahtna words from [http://www.johnsmelcer.com/resources/Ahtna+Dictionary.pdf Ahtna Noun Dictionary by John E. Smelcer (2009)]. The apostrophe ’ in this pdf file (but, copy-paste from this pdf file is ‟). --Kmoksy (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Xenophyte
Element 124 talkback
{{talkback|Talk:Unbiquadium}} Double sharp (talk) 08:57, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Your beautiful graphic has an error (typo) in it
Your beautiful graphic:
The main nuclear reaction chains for Big Bang nucleosynthesis
has an error (typo) in it. Specifically, the neutron and proton accounting does not balance out in your representation of the reaction
:from Nucleosynthesis#Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis:
Image:Primordial nucleosynthesis2.png of light atomic nuclei observed throughout the universe.]]
↑ Aabaakawad • (BWE Project) → 20:29, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
[[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]]
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
[[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open!
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Pamputt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Pamputt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Pamputt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[[Artificial intelligence art]]
Hello. You created an image that is used in that article; I am not sure if this is correct since the description doesn't explain clearly how AI was used in this. In either case, I'd like to invite you to the discussion at :Talk:Computational_creativity#Merge_from_Artificial_imagination,_Creative_computing_and_Artificial_intelligence_art. I also created the category :commons:Category:Computational creativity and I added your picture there. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)