User talk:Shadow. 547

Hi Shadow. 547! I noticed your contributions to :Otrar Catastrophe and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Bamyan (1221). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ashina Revolt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Liberation of Khovd. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.

:File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

:dude i didnt even add Mongol victory🤦‍♂️ Shadow. 547 (talk) 16:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

::Regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timurid_conquests_and_invasions&diff=prev&oldid=1261875563 this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timurid_conquests_and_invasions&diff=next&oldid=1261875563 this] edit, what do you not understand about MOS:MILRESULT? The relevant page was linked, instead you write {{tq|yeah the result stuff did get removed because some random guy called Airshipman something like that yeah he didn’t like it and was yapping about Timurid victory should be blah blah blah}}. If you are simply going to edit war over this, then it suggests that a block is necessary. Mellk (talk) 12:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on :Talk:Timurid conquests and invasions. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Nishapur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

:That's great, thank you so much @AirshipJungleman29! @Shadow. 547 AI has a tendency to "hallucinate" and make things up (I saw a fascinating video about a lawyer who used ChatGPT and completely destroyed his court case, the judge was really angry when they found out). It's great that you're trying to fill in gaps in Wikipedia, but so many people use this site that we have to be incredibly careful. I'd recommend rewriting the article from scratch in your own words (you can use the draft as a skeleton) and look for reliable sources, again from scratch because AI isn't good at this part. There are lots of pages to help you do this, and you can use the Teahouse if you need help! I'm learning a lot about copyediting, grammar checking etc. so I'm happy to give your draft a once-over from that perspective before you submit it to AFC if that might be useful for you? Blue-Sonnet (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Moscow (1238), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Moscow. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

:No i don’t want it to be merged to mongol invasion of khwarezmian empire i want it to be a seperate article so il keep editing and adding sources Shadow. 547 (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

:@AirshipJungleman29 no offense but i do not understand what u just said like what do u want from me and why is my article not being accepted like can u talk in simple words because my grammar is not good Shadow. 547 (talk) 17:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:@AirshipJungleman29 also im telling you right now i will NOT merge it to the mongol invasion of khwarezmian empitr article i want it to be a seperate article and theres many sources about Bamiyan its just that im lazy so it takes long and i have school aswell Shadow. 547 (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

::So you do understand? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:58, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:::@AirshipJungleman29 Only that but i dont understand why its not being accepted like i put a lot of sources Shadow. 547 (talk) 18:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

::::None of them talk very much about the siege—what we call "significant coverage". Alison Behnke has three sentences, George Kohn has two, Llewelyn Morgan has less than half of one sentence. They are instead focused on the general campaign. Saying {{green|"im telling you right now i will NOT merge it to the mongol invasion of khwarezmian empitr article"}} because you don't like what the sources are saying is not helpful. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::@AirshipJungleman29 But I literally checked the sources and they describe the text i put in my article and even tho if they are focused on something more than what im talking about theres still sources i can find for my article so just wait a while and it will be accepted (probably) but one question how many sources do i even need so my article gets accepted? Shadow. 547 (talk) 18:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::Typically, you need at least three reliable sources that cover the subject in detail. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:13, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::::@AirshipJungleman29 then it will be accepted and it will become a new article? Shadow. 547 (talk) 20:55, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Probably. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::@AirshipJungleman29 hey so i added a few references can u check the article and see if this is good or? because im also gonna be adding a lot of information about the siege of bamiyan because what i found about the siege is interesting but i just wanna know if my article looks good right now Shadow. 547 (talk) 19:37, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to :Draft:Siege of Bamyan (1221). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. If the article has failed AFC twice then it's not ready to be moved to mainspace. Please don't move it again, thanks. Blue Sonnet (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, :Draft:Sack of Suzdal, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3ASack+of+Suzdal|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:51, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

:hey so i FORGOT to remove the "test" text and i was gonna work on it time by time so thats why i created it Shadow. 547 (talk) 18:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Bamyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hazara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mongolia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mongolian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page :Golden Horde, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

:Do not edit quotes to insert links to articles. Quotes should never be altered. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

::And do bother to look up what a WP:REDIRECT is before you nominate them for deletion? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:48, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

:::If you are creating redirects for the sole purpose of adding them into categories, please stop and look at WP:RCAT: {{green|"Redirects are not usually sorted to article categories"}}. A reminder: categories are to help readers navigate between actual articles. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Bamyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timurid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Can you please stop adding the duration in years to historical state infoboxes? You can clearly see that this is not standard practice, and it's disruptive for you to then edit-war on this as you did at Mongol Empire. Readers can do the math themselves if they want, otherwise it's unnecessary clutter and a distraction from the more substantive chronological information. If you disagree, start a talk page discussion on this on the relevant article(s). R Prazeres (talk) 19:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars involving Mongolia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ainu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOTBROKEN. Remsense ‥ 论 21:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:K Shadow. 547 (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Template:Did you know nominations/Mongol siege of Kaifeng (1232). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:44, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Cinderella157 (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

:im on vacation and il look into it later on when im back Shadow. 547 (talk) 10:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Nicopolis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, Shadow. 547. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liberation of Khovd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 25 April 2025 (UTC)