User talk:Shakib khan1985#top

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

I am really glad for your invitation. I will make sure that I will work according to wikipedia guidelines Shakib khan1985 (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

{{checkuserblock-account|sig=Doug Weller talk 17:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have totally followed Wikipedia rules . I seems like a planned outrage against me Shakib khan1985 (talk) 17:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)|decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
• #understand what you have been blocked for,
• #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
• #will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed |1= my conduct under any circumstances is not related to any other user who’s name seems to be associated with me or seems to be using same ip range as me .Shakib khan1985 (talk) 17:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC) |decline = Sockpuppetry {{confirmed}}. Yamla (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)}}

Brother is any legal action possible?? This women have now edited 200 year old Kanyakubja Vanshavali and posted the content removing Bhumihars from it. Rai950 (talk) 11:05, 30 December 2020 (UTC)