User talk:SpunkyGeek#top

Please could you find some citations for: {{tq|Sabarmati Riverfront is a waterfront being developed along the banks of the Sabarmati river in Ahmedabad, India. Proposed in the 1960s, its construction began in 2005, opened in 2012.}} in the article on :Ahmedabad. You edited it; you must have got the information from somewhere.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

:Hey Toddy1,

:I have added a citation to it. Sorry missed it yesterday.

:Can we collaborate more on this article? I have got some ideas if you are interested.

:Thanks. talk) 07:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi SpunkyGeek. I'm not sure if you've noticed- but your signatures aren't being formatted properly, see above example (only the link to talk page appears and not your username). For proper format of signatures they should be signed by using four tildes ~~~~ or by clicking the signature icon on the edit tool bar. Eucalyptusmint (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

:Hope this looks good now... SpunkyGeek(talk) 02:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

:Added - talk and contribs SpunkyGeek (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

::Yep, looks much better! Eucalyptusmint (talk) 03:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Copyright-problem.svg One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:34, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :Narendra Modi Stadium, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Narendra_Modi_Stadium&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1183197254%7CNarendra%20Modi%20Stadium%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20SpunkyGeek§ion=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Narendra Modi Stadium}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1183197254 report it to my operator].

Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

What is happening in the article about anti Hindu violence in Bangladesh of 2024 is shameful. But not entirely unexpected of Wikipedia. I really get very angry whenever I see these leftists taking over Wikipedia. 103.52.220.222 (talk) 19:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

:Hello IP: @103.52.220.222,

:Thank you for your concern regarding the targeted violence against Hindus in Bangladesh. I'd like to share a few suggestions:

:# Let's work together to build consensus among the editors regarding the section you're particularly concerned about.

:# Please review the relevant Wikipedia policies before making any edits or reverts; this will help us enhance the quality of the article.

:# Lastly, having a registered Wikipedia account rather than editing as an IP address can help establish credibility for your contributions.

:Thanks again for reaching out. SpunkyGeek (talk) 02:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

|-

| style="vertical-align:top;" |

WikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titled The Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated.

• Project news: Project news from WP:CRIC including the list of Awards presented in 2024 and the final results of Contests held in 2024.
• Article news: Article news from WP:CRIC including list of FAC, FLC, FPC, PR, GAN, ITN, RD etc. from 2024.
• Cricket news: Summary of International Cricket events took place in 2024 from T20 World Cups to WTC pathway.

::: ''{{talkspace detect

| user = You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

| other = If you'd like to receive the newsletter, add your preferred page to the mailing list. Thank You!

}}''

{{hr|2}}

• Cricket Picture of the Year 2024: Nominations will open up in mid-October.
• Cricket WikiContest 2025: More details will be revealed soon.
• : Visit the contests page for the latest information.

{{hr|2}}

• A discussion about merging the child WikiProjects WP:IPL, WP:BPL, WP:PSL and WP:LPL back into WP:CRIC as taskforces is currently ongoing in the project talk page.

{{hr|3}}

::: ''{{talkspace detect

| user = You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

| other = If you'd like to receive the newsletter, add your preferred page to the mailing list. Thank You!

}}''

|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

|}

– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Ratnahastin (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at :Talk:BAPS Shri Swaminarayan mandir (Robbinsville, New Jersey). Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! - Ratnahastin (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on :2024 Jharkhand Legislative Assembly election. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Refer to the following [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2024_Jharkhand_Legislative_Assembly_election&diff=prev&oldid=1263007286 talk page comment]. And also do not add sources to content you add that do not support said content. Refer to this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2024_Jharkhand_Legislative_Assembly_election&diff=prev&oldid=1263008017 talk page comment]. MrMkG (talk) 04:26, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

• Following the discussion took place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket, set of new task forces have been created and has been added to the WikiProject banner as well.
• # Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/ICC cricket task force
• # Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Women's cricket task force
• # Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Africa cricket task force
• # Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Americas cricket task force
• # Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Asia cricket task force
• # Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/EAP cricket task force
• # Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Europe cricket task force
• Everyone interested in the topic are welcome to join the task forces!
• Also, you are requested to mark the articles under the scope of each task force by adding the relevant parameters to the talkpage banner:
• : {{Para|ICC|yes}} for ICC cricket task force
• : {{Para|Women's|yes}} for Women's cricket task force
• : {{Para|Africa|yes}} for Africa cricket task force
• : {{Para|Americas|yes}} for Americas cricket task force
• : {{Para|Asia|yes}} for Asia cricket task force
• : {{Para|EAP|yes}} for EAP cricket task force
• : {{Para|Europe|yes}} for Europe cricket task force

This message was sent to you because you have been added to the WikiProject Cricket's news mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#c-Abhishek0831996-20250214095100-Request_concerning_SpunkyGeek] Abhishek0831996 (talk) 09:55, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

If I understand correctly, you tried to nominate Deportation of Indian nationals under Donald Trump for deletion. That didn't work. The page shows the source code {{subst:afd1}} instead of the message that you probably intended, and the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deportation of Indian nationals under Donald Trump hasn't been created. I deleted the malformed AfD message template. If you want, you can try again, but please make sure that you read and understand WP:BEFORE and WP:AFDHOWTO. — Chrisahn (talk) 00:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

:Yes you are right! @Chrisahn,

:Sorry, this is my first time nominating a page for deletion - and made a couple of mistakes.

:I will go through the policy again and make sure it's done correctly.

:Thanks! SpunkyGeek (talk) 02:05, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|decline=Unfortunately, it has been over a month since we last heard from you, so I am declining this stale unblock request. Feel free to submit a new request if you would like to return to editing. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)|1=Dear Respected Admins,

I am writing this message in complete shock and disappointment. I feel I have been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Moksha88/Archive#Clerk,_CheckUser,_and/or_patrolling_admin_comments_4 unfairly treated] simply for editing a particular article and without any opportunity to give my thoughts.

I was targeted by User: [https://Abhishek083199 Abhishek083199], who accused me of edit-warring and someone who had no history on the article in question or with me. However, two other admins ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&diff=1275775594&oldid=1275768203 Liz] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&diff=1275991259&oldid=1275991132 Cullen328]) confirmed that I was not engaging in edit warring and that the misunderstanding arose due to an incorrect interpretation of policy, which I acknowledged. When this claim was debunked, they attempted to portray me as a POV editor. However, they failed to prove that I was using unreliable sources. Whenever disagreements arose regarding my edits, I remained civil and engaged in talk page discussions to resolve disputes. Since all these accusations have fallen apart, they have now reopened a previously closed case—one that found no evidence linking me to Moksha88. Despite the absence of any new evidence, Tamzin proceeded to block me indefinitely based on her own personal assumptions that people should only edit topics that are related to their native language. And that I have a POV.

User: [http://User:Ratnahastin Ratnahastin's] slow edit war began with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swaminarayan_Akshardham_%28Robbinsville%2C_New_Jersey%29&diff=1247178330&oldid=1247177457 this edit] that escalated with 2 mysterious users showing up (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swaminarayan_Akshardham_%28Robbinsville%2C_New_Jersey%29&diff=1254055264&oldid=1252384094 1], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swaminarayan_Akshardham_%28Robbinsville%2C_New_Jersey%29&diff=1255074298&oldid=1254947172 2]), who've never edited the page tried to restore to User: Ratnahastin's POV version. They reverted repeatedly while the talk page discussion was going on (have a look at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swaminarayan_Akshardham_(Robbinsville,_New_Jersey)&diff=prev&oldid=1254947172 3], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swaminarayan_Akshardham_%28Robbinsville%2C_New_Jersey%29&diff=1255222321&oldid=1255074298 4], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swaminarayan_Akshardham_(Robbinsville,_New_Jersey)#Lawsuit_in_introduction_section 5]).

I have been accused of a Conflict of Interest (COI), but does uploading pictures of a certain structure automatically imply COI? I am in no way affiliated to the - sock puppets that admin Tamzin has mentioned. The claim that having permission to upload these images constitutes COI is completely baseless especially when I was trying to do the right thing and obtained permission by a formal request per policy. So, is following policy incorrect and does that mean that if any user in the future has permissions to upload pictures related to these structures, they are a going to be assumed a "moksha88" sock? - this does not make sense to me.

Additionally, Tamzin alleged that I am a Native American based on some form of "writing analysis". This is entirely false—English is not my first language. This is yet another instance where her assumption is incorrect.

Given Tamzin's previous history with the topic area, this is a biased administrative action. Given this, I find it inappropriate for her to be adjudicating this investigation because she is a WP:INVOLVED admin.

I respectfully request a fair and objective review of this matter.

PS: I have briefly explained the situation - above, however, I can provide more details on the situation if given a chance to explain.

SpunkyGeek (talk) 02:58, 22 February 2025 (UTC)|idletimestamp=20250315195758}}

:{{u|Tamzin}}, I'm curious to know if the above makes you more or less certain about your conclusions earlier. -- asilvering (talk) 05:13, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for the ping, {{re|Asilvering|p=.}} I'd say take a look at {{slink|Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Moksha88/Archive#Comments_by_other_users}}, § Comments by other users 3, {{slink|User_talk:Moksha88#Blocked_for_sockpuppetry}}, utrs:61231, {{slink|User_talk:Apollo1203#Blocked_as_a_sockpuppet}}, User talk:Skubydoo, and {{slink|User_talk:Harshmellow717#Blocked_as_a_sockpuppet}}, and tell me if this approach seems familiar. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 05:38, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

:::I assume by this you mean "more certain". -- asilvering (talk) 07:28, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

::::Yes. I mean, sockblock appeals are always tricky things, since guilty and innocent people tend to write similar things, but this particular combination of deflecting onto other editors' conduct, litigating against a misrepresented version of the socking evidence, and dodging the actual substantive evidence, is more something I associate with people who are correctly accused, and as you can see, it's something all the Moksha sox are known for. That said, I wouldn't attach a tremendous amount of weight either way to what SpunkyGeek's said here. The main evidence is what's presented in the SPI. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 07:33, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

:SpunkyGeek, why do you think Tamzin is too involved to take any part in this? I don't see any evidence of that at all. -- asilvering (talk) 19:57, 15 March 2025 (UTC)