User talk:Srich32977#Please check your understanding of 'fringe'

{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}}

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

{{User QAIbox

| image = Yellow roses, Johannisberg.jpg

| image_upright = 0.8

| bold = story · music · places

}}

Thank you for improving article quality in May. One of mine was Jadwiga Rappé. --

When the report was accessed it was accessed through ProQuest. You are more than welcome to add an ID, but it is not required. The empty ProQuest ID templates throw an error that causes further cleanup edits behind you to fix. -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 20:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks. A few points: 1. If an editor says the citation is "via ProQuest" they should provide the ProQuest data that will verify where the ProQuest citation can be found. (1.a. How do we encourage editors to actually verify such data?) 2. When the "id=" is in the citation, nothing shows up in the article reference listing because there is no actual data in the listing portion of the "id=" parameter. 3. Example: I just now added "|id={{ProQuest|via= }}" to :Olive Smithells. I do not see any error message or any listing in the hidden categories. 4. In the particular case that you reverted, I think the error message was generated by a different item in the multiple edits you reverted. 5. Egad! I hope my understanding of what I did is correct. – S. Rich (talk) 22:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

:::I've also raised this issue with you before, and you really need to stop changing these citations to your preferred version. The template documentation for cite news in the template data section for the via parameter, clearly gives examples of accepted usage, Example EBSCOHost, Proquest, Newspapers.com. This has been brought to your attention before [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Srich32977&oldid=1286875654#Can_you_explain_this? as seen here], and over the objections of several editors now, you continue changing them, when it's clear you don't have consensus to keep on changing them, so please stop, as continuing this editing behavior could be potentially seen as disruptive. Additionally, when you needlessly changed one [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foreign_involvement_in_the_Venezuelan_presidential_crisis&diff=1295328452&oldid=1284627660 as seen here], you didn't even bother to check if there was an online version of that source, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foreign_involvement_in_the_Venezuelan_presidential_crisis&diff=1295353831&oldid=1295352014 which I easily found]. Isaidnoway (talk) 07:37, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Merge-arrows.svg An article that you have been involved in editing—Politics of the Arizona Borderlands—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Horse.staple (talk) 06:30, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I've recently reverted changes you made to May 16 - specifically where you replaced the – character(s) with an actual en dash. Please notice that WP:DOYSTYLE mandates the use of –. I can see that you are using WP:AutoEd - I haven't used this myself, but if you can ensure that it does not make these changes automatically, that would be appreciated. Thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 03:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

{{User QAIbox

| image = Foxglove, Scheid, Ehrenbach.jpg

| image_upright = 0.8

| bold = story · music · places

}}

Thank you for improving article quality in June! - I heard this music, yesterday, - streamed a day before at a different location. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:32, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I have nominated Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907 for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)