User talk:Steadyonplease

February 2014

Image:Information.svg Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to :Kim Fox has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [{{User:ClueBot NG/Warnings/FPReport|1686655}} report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kim Fox was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kim+Fox&diff=594089276&oldid=592493560 changed] by Steadyonplease (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924686 on 2014-02-05T19:35:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to :Phil Mitchell with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Mitchell?diff=594087604 this edit], even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Josh3580_talk/hist 19:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at :Dexter Hartman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tentinator 19:42, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Image:Stop x nuvola.svg You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|reason=Can I have another chance? Steadyonplease (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)|decline=I don't see why, since you're also attempting to edit as {{u|The destructor of articles}}, {{u|Thisismyusername96}}, {{u|Avederson}}, and {{u|Bitbopbo}}. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC) }}

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Has there been any investigation into this sock puppetry? I don't see any investigation open so I don't see how this has come about. | decline = Well, I just found and blocked four more of your accounts. —DoRD (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Actually this is a sock puppet of drwho16, so it is not guilty of sockpuppeting, as it is a sock puppet. | decline = All the more reason it still should be blocked. In fact, since this was your third request that basically just seems to be playing with us, ~~I will be revoking your talk page access so you won't be able to waste our time anymore~~. It seems that was done almost a month ago, and you made this request with yet another sock. Now you've really pissed us off. I'm full-protecting this page. If you want to waste anyone else's time, you'll have to do it through OTRS, without the audience you so transparently crave. G'bye. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)}}