User talk:StephanSnow

File:Chocolate chip cookies.jpg

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, StephanSnow! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

{{Div col|colwidth=18em}}

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

{{Div col end}}

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kleinpecan (talk) 05:50, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Control copyright icon.svg Hello StephanSnow! Your additions to :Ivan Sirko have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners. {{#ifeq: | 1 |}}
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

do you use discord? Ömerfrk4334 (talk) 19:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

:Any reason for asking? StephanSnow (talk) 03:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

::yes LGT55 (talk) 16:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi StephanSnow. Thank you for your work on Battle of Igren. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Nice work}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|North8000}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi StephanSnow. Thank you for your work on Crimean Campaign (1675). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Nice work}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|North8000}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 04:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

. LGT55 (talk) 09:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

:snow237 @LGT55 StephanSnow (talk) 11:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

::i send request LGT55 (talk) 11:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

::can you accept LGT55 (talk) 12:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Control copyright icon.svg Hello StephanSnow! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of Nabróż, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.academia.edu/57257984/Ukrai%C5%84skie_podziemie_na_Lubelszczy%C5%BAnie_w_okresie_okupacji_niemieckiej_1939_1944, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Battle of Nabróż and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org {{nospam|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Battle of Nabróż, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org {{nospam|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Battle of Nabróż. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Battle of Nabróż with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [{{fullurl:Talk:Battle of Nabróż/Temp|action=edit&preload=Template:Copyvio/preload}} this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Battle of Nabróż saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Nihil novi nisi (talk) 10:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Stop_hand_nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning for adding in articles WP:OR. The array of falsifications and falsehoods crosses all boundaries this was shown in battle of Sich (1674), it has been pointed out to you before that you are cheating and that the sources you add to some things do not reflect what is written in them. Nihil novi nisi (talk) 16:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

:@Dushnilkin Quotes from sources translated to English:

:Source for 150 Cossacks on page 167 (at the end of web page 80) [https://litnet.com/ru/reader/koshevoi-ataman-zaporozhskoi-sechi-idserko-b237575?c=2208478&p=80]:

:*"...When they themselves saw that their Sich was filled with the enemy - the Turks, they immediately and as quietly as possible summoned all the comrades of their Kurin, who numbered up to one hundred and fifty people, and informed them about the impending disaster."

:Source for 350 Cossacks (also mentioned on Ukrainian Wikipedia) [http://litopys.org.ua/velichko/vel33.htm]:

:*"...When they themselves saw the Sich full of their enemies, the Turks, then at once quietly awaken the whole company of their hut, of whom there were three and a half hundred, and they told them of the trouble that awaited them."

:These are the sources that were given failed verification label in Battle of Sich (1674). The message left by @Nihil novi nisi is unreasonable. These figures are mentioned in citied sources and aren't WP:OR. StephanSnow (talk) 04:18, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

::I only set the FV for 350 people, because I didn't see it in the source myself, show it there, not on another wiki. Good morning. Dushnilkin (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:::Alright. Than don't see what else is supposed to be an "array of falsifications and falsehoods" that "crosses all boundaries" in what I added to this article. Good morning. StephanSnow (talk) 05:40, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

::::Well, I didn't say that, the article really has a lot to show for it, but not OR Dushnilkin (talk) 07:12, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::Yeah, that part was meant to refer to Nihil who left the message. StephanSnow (talk) 07:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

::The falsity of stastics and other things has already been proven by you in Battle of Nabróż, UPA Lublin offensive. I thought Dushnilkin would show more such falsifications so I put up this warning template. Nihil novi nisi (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

:::The only thing I saw was the absence of numbers in the source, and I indicated the appropriate note. In general, the article itself should be redone or deleted. She figures in one chronicle source with obvious hyperbolization. Allegedly, 15,000 "selected Istanbul janissaries" went to plunder the surroundings of Ukraine! Well, I don't think the figures with the losses and forces of the parties need any comments. Good afternoon. Dushnilkin (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

:::The problem with Battle of Nabróż was that in the main source I used, the source mentioned the first failed attack on Nabroz (May 4-5), then the source reported a bunch of skirmishes with some details (such as casualties) until May 18-19, when another attack on Nabroz was mentioned. These skirmishes probably weren’t related to the actual battle, and I added a bunch of unnecessary information as a result, also in too much detail from the source, which could’ve made it sound similar to the original text in the source.

:::Similar problem with UPA Lublin offensive, where the source listed battles from April to May, then stated: "As a result of these events…" mentioning establishment of Kholm front, council and other information. Apparently this source wasn’t the most detailed and made it sound like it was a single major offensive instead of separate battles. This problem was already resolved by Fajowy on this page.

:::For the Battle of Sich (1674) (which was used as an example of the worst violation of WP:OR), there isn’t even violation of WP:OR, only a problem with sources at most.

:::I think this warning template was unreasonable. The information in these articles was supported by cited sources, most of which I put in the text of article itself to avoid WP:OVERCITE in the infobox in the first 2 articles, but I complied it wrong in the case of first 2 articles as I explained. StephanSnow (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

::::This skirmish is WP:OR no such term in the historiography, just like the offensive on Lublin. It is part of the Hrubieszów revolution. Nihil novi nisi (talk) 17:29, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::Nabroz was an actual separate skirmish that took place in May. Lublin offensive wasn’t though which I already explained, and was actually a list of different skirmishes in the source, some are part of the Hrubieszów Revolution. StephanSnow (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

::Hi {{ping|StephanSnow}} How goes it. This was one somebody else's talk page. I don't how it got there. It is a bit late unfortunately. scope_creep^Talk 08:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

Hi StephanSnow. Thank you for your work on Cossack raid on Istanbul (1629). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Nice work}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|North8000}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)