User talk:Sun Creator/Archive 20#Precious

Generally speaking blogs aren't reliable sources. There are some exceptions, such as reporting precisely what the blogger has written, but this is useful only if that is itself appropriate to report in an encyclopedia. None of the rather small number of acceptable uses applies to the Keene article, which as you know is not the same as the Obama article. Quale (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello Sun Creator, I see that you have just rated the article World Chess Championship 2013 as B class. What do you think could be improved about it? If it is not long enough, then what should be added into it? Thanks, Toccata quarta (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

:Post match information. Such as found in http://www.indianexpress.com/news/defeated-drained-but-viswanathan-anand-plans-next-moves/1198890/0 https://www.aftenposten.no/100Sport/sjakk/Na-vil-jeg-fortsette-a-vinne-Jeg-vil-vare-en-aktiv-verdensmester-405040_1.snd http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25057654 Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 19:17, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

A discussion concerning the creation of improbable redirects, related to a page or pages you created, has started at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive257#Mass creation of very improbable redirects. Fram (talk) 11:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|smallimage=File:Pictogram_resolved.svg

|smalltext=This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{tlf|admin help-helped}} on this page with {{tlf|admin help}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

|small=yes

}}

I was reverting the move of List of Steinitz Variations to Steinitz Variation but accidentally left the trailing 's'. Please revert the article to the original name of Steinitz Variation. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 00:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

:Sorted. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

:: Please note that Steinitz Variation, in its present state, is not a disambiguation page, which is purely a navigational device like a redirect. If it were a disambiguation page, the lede would only say "Steinitz Variation may refer to:", and the content of the page would be reduced to a collection of bare links, with no images on the page, and no links other than to pages referring to titles containing the phrase "Steinitz Variation", or otherwise meeting WP:DABMENTION. bd2412 T 19:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

::: The lede wording on MOS:DABMENTION] is just an example, not a requirement. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 19:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

:::: Excluding all material from a disambiguation page other than the links and a brief description of them, however, is a requirement, as is complying with community consensus. Please let me know now if you are unwilling to conform your conduct to the requirements of this project, so that I can take the appropriate steps. bd2412 T 19:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

:::::If your interested in community consensus you'll be discussing the issue on the talk page as I suggested in a previous edit summary. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 20:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

:::::ah, now I see you did comment on the talk page, but I never noticed it because until now the talk page was missing/had other name. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 20:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

:::::: I have to admit that you caught me in a bad mood. However, I can assure you, I have worked on literally tens of thousands of disambiguation pages (and hundreds of thousands of articles, generally), and I am the best authority you can find on what is or is not properly considered a disambiguation page. bd2412 T 20:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the [http://www.grouplens.org/node/494 SuggestBot study page].

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

The person removing that material is most likely the sockpuppet/troll Wiki brah, whose express purpose is to disrupt wikipedia - when a new account shows up and immediately starts editing the chess.com article to paint that website in an unfavorable light, that's a dead giveaway. Why remove the material anyway? Why not just tag it if you really think it's necessary to add a citation? Is it so controversial to add an easily verifiable description of a website? It's not like it's a BLP or anything. I think it's kind of rude to remove neutrally presented material just because it is allegedly "unsourced" even though it's readily verifiable. MaxBrowne (talk) 10:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this [https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_23JuoVF5e7dgDl3 brief survey.] Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

There's a discussion about the redirect \xC3\x85land Islands which you created. —rybec 22:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the [http://www.grouplens.org/node/494 SuggestBot study page].

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AARTalk. Since you had some involvement with the AARTalk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 11:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)