User talk:Tamilcontent1

Hello, Tamilcontent1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or {{edit|Special:MyTalk|ask for help on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Knitsey (talk) 03:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your changes [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maharaja_%282024_film%29&diff=1242164208&oldid=1242049862 here]. Note that the total number of words in a plot summary should be between 400 and 700 words. We are at 700 now {{P}}. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you. Really didn’t know that. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 13:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. Do not change portions of page content, without reliable sources, as you did at :Amaran (2024 film). RangersRus (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

:check the reference and read correctly mister. check worldwide gross. i can quote the article for yourself. what you are putting is domestic gross. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

::Show me where it says 296. It shows 219. RangersRus (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

:::"The total box office gross of Amaran at the Indian box office stands at Rs. 219 crore approx, placing it as the seventh highest-grossing Kollywood film of all time. Globally it is fast approaching the Rs. 300 crore benchmark, which it will reach in the next couple of days. Its worldwide gross currently stands at Rs. 296 crore, with USD 9.10 million coming from overseas." Tamilcontent1 (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

::::please read the article fully before putting unnecessary talk pages. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

:don't change the article repeatedly. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

::Thanks for correcting me. RangersRus (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

:it is from the article itself. only reading some parts and putting your POV does not make sense, Tamilcontent1 (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

::Yes I did not pay attention to the bottom of the page. It is not about putting my POV. RangersRus (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at :Annaatthe, you may be blocked from editing. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:30, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

:Please check and read the page before making unsubstantial and seemingly imprudent talks such as this. Annaathe gross was properly sourced by the article from Pinkvilla. Check this url: https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/box-office/7-rajinikanth-highest-grossing-movies-2point0-tops-1307950, if you have time to do unnecessary talk. "Annaatthe in 2021 grossed slightly over Rs 140 crores": This is mentioned.

:First read and improve your knowledge!!! Tamilcontent1 (talk) 03:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at :Lingaa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

:What do you mean not properly sourced? There is a proper source and it does not have anything to do with biographies of living persons or defamatory as you have suggested. It is just talking about a movie collection. How is that defamatory? Prove that my facts are unsourced or poorly sourced: (User talk:Jeraxmoira)

:Snap out of your fan mindset and accept criticism from reliable sources!!!

:It can not be stopped.

:Stop putting unnecessary talk in my page. Don't you have anything productive? Tamilcontent1 (talk) 22:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

:Please stop doing disruptive editing as you have done in Lingaa, Annathe, and List of highest-grossing Tamil films or any other Wikipedia page. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 22:51, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

::The source you added is not written by a journalist. Do you see a journalist credited anywhere in the article? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Yeah. There is no author. But, the same article is used as a reference multiple times in List of highest-grossing Tamil films. Check the references for highest grossing movies. It obviously is a creditable source. You can double check here: Wikipedia:ICTFFAQ.

:::There is no need to have a journalist credited if the content is from a reliable source from my understanding. Please avoid Vandalism in multiple articles such as Lingaa. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

::::Just because something is incorrect in another article doesn't mean the same mistake should be repeated in other articles. You can always remove the reference from the other article as well. It is not a credible source if it lacks a byline and being listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/ICTF FAQ without prior discussion does not automatically make it reliable.

::::{{tq|There is no need to have a journalist credited if the content is from a reliable source from my understanding.}} - That is not how Wikipedia works, especially when considering the Indian media. Any reliable source will credit their journalist. Feel free to add the criticism back once you have a bylined, reliable source. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{tq|"Any reliable source will credit their journalist."}} Tell me where such thing is mentioned in Wikipedia policies. This is just your point of view. That doesn't make it a fact. File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please avoid doing disruptive edits as you have keep on doing, even today on the page Lingaa. Tags: Continuous disruptive editing (Wikipedia:Vandalism) by user Jeraxmoira. Tags: Twinkle, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing – Tamilcontent1 (talk) 01:57, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{tq|"That is not how Wikipedia works, especially when considering the Indian media. Any reliable source will credit their journalist."}} How did you become an expert on how Wikipedia works concerning Indian media? File:Stop hand nuvola.svg Warning: how can you keep reverting articles without proper explanation as you have done in Lingaa? Tags: Wikipedia:Vandalism - by user Jeraxmoira. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 02:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{tq|"Just because something is incorrect in another article doesn't mean the same mistake should be repeated in other articles."}} How do you know which fact is incorrect? Give proper explanation before reverting. You are just saying a collection figure and related facts are incorrect from an article from a reputed site. What research did you do to come to this conclusion? Tamilcontent1 (talk) 02:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::Just because some detail is against your fan mindset - you are trying to find a nonexistent issue in a genuine article. Snap out of this point of view, and accept facts and criticism. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::Wikipedia:Reliable sources, an English Wikipedia content guideline, states that "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors... ". If you continue to add unreliable sources, this may be taken to WP:ANI. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::If you keep on adding disruptive edits as you have done in Lingaa, Annathe, and List of highest-grossing Tamil films or any other Wikipedia page, your account would be blocked. Last warning. File:Nuvola apps important.svg Tags: Wikipedia:Vandalism - by user Jeraxmoira, Twinkle, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing Mentioned multiple times, Still keeps on doing edit warring. (talk) 04:20, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Read fully before forcing your opinion on others and making childish threats: {{tq|"This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians, who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves."}} It says the authors should not be Wikipedians and the source must be reliable. You conveniently removed the important part. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 04:29, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::The same article mentions: {{tq|"When editors talk about sources that are being cited on Wikipedia, they might be referring to any one of these three concepts:}}

:::::::{{tq|The piece of work itself (the article, book)}}

:::::::{{tq|The creator of the work (the writer, journalist)}}

:::::::{{tq|The publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press)"}} In this context, I have cited the piece of work, which is the article from a reliable publisher in NDTV. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 04:36, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Again you failed to prove that my source is unreliable. I have clear proof that my source is creditable and the documentation is here: Wikipedia:ICTFFAQ. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 04:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Another thing is very intriguing to me: There are thousands of authors in Wikipedia. Why are you so obsessed with me? Is it because the article concerned is of a movie star and you have that fan mindset?

:::::::Please read fully before reverting and avoid disruptive editing. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 04:53, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Adding a single source claiming that the film collected ₹140 crores, especially one published three years after the film's release makes no sense. For such claims, please add multiple high-quality, independent sources to support your statement. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:What are your sources? Your source does not have an author. Check again. The article was published on 2024. Check it first before commenting. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 08:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

::The article published on Nov 24, 2021 by Shweta Keshri linked below states that {{tq|ANNAATTHE EARNS RS 238.78 CRORE WORLDWIDE}}

::* {{Cite web |title=Annaatthe box office collection Day 20: Rajinikanth's film inches closer to Rs 150 crore in TN |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/annaatthe-box-office-collection-day-20-rajinikanth-s-film-inches-closer-to-rs-150-crore-in-tn-1880119-2021-11-24 |access-date=2025-04-17 |website=www.indiatoday.in |language=en}}

::Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:::A more recent article published by Rishil Jogani on May 21, 2024 states: {{tq|Annaatthe in 2021 grossed slightly over Rs 140 crores.}} Link here: https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/box-office/7-rajinikanth-highest-grossing-movies-2point0-tops-1307950

:::Read again before reverting and edit warring. Muliple disruprive edits by Jeraxmoira (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeraxmoira) Tamilcontent1 (talk) 08:16, 17 April 2025 (UTC)