User talk:The Anome#Direct calls to tool server

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| algo = old(30d)

| archive = User talk:The Anome/Archive %(counter)d

| counter = 22

| maxarchivesize = 150K

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| minthreadsleft = 4

}}

{{Archives|auto=long|search=yes}}

{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}

{{Boxboxtop|}}

{{User MAW 400}}

{{User Twenty Year Society}}

{{Boxboxbottom}}

{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}

Support request with team editing experiment project

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing]), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing project] noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Micru User:Micru] on meta.

[[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, The Anome. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

NHRP detaggables

So, I ended up here: User:The Anome/NHRP detaggables because of this redirect, Skeleton Cave Massacre Site. I recently created Skeleton Cave (Arizona), and when I was linking other pages to the article, I found the detaggables page. In scanning your list, I came across Work, John, House and Mill Site which I then linked to John Work House and Mill Site which has existed since 2006.

It occurred to me that there may be a number of pages already in existence, but since they are not formatted the same as what's on this page, they aren't being identified as being done. I'm trying to think on how to solve this problem. --evrik (talk)

[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Punk Bunny Coffee]]

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Punk Bunny Coffee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article reads like an advertisement, and I can barely find any sources following the name change.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Concern regarding [[Draft:Contrarianism]]

File:Information.svg Hello, The Anome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Contrarianism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, [[Draft:National Security Decision Memorandum 242]]

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, The Anome. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "National Security Decision Memorandum 242".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:National Security Decision Memorandum 242|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-17

MediaWiki message delivery 20:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi The Anome. Thank you for your work on Gergő Bese. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Good translation work, thanks!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Moriwen}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Moriwen (talk) 20:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-18

MediaWiki message delivery 19:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 1 May 2025

{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-05-01}}

[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Application Control Management System]]

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Application Control Management System has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-19

MediaWiki message delivery 00:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

File:ANEWSicon.png

File:Wikipedia Administrator.svg Administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Rusalkii

:File:Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg {{hlist|class=inline

|Master Jay

|Orderinchaos

|Roger Davies

|Tinucherian

}}

File:Wikipedia Interface administrator.svg Interface administrator changes

:File:Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Galobtter

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
  • An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{t|sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
  • An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

}}}}{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC)}}

Concern regarding [[Draft:Gear fetishism]]

File:Information.svg Hello, The Anome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gear fetishism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Mentorship

Hi The_Anome,
A user recently asked me a question on my talk page regarding One Morning in May (folk song), specifically referencing James Taylor’s version from the album One Man Dog. Since I’m not sure how to handle these kinds of song-related queries — whether it’s appropriate to cite such versions, mention them in the article, or redirect the user elsewhere — I wanted to ask for your advice.
Since you're an experienced editor, I was wondering how you'd approach this kind of query. Is it appropriate to respond with sourcing advice, or should I redirect the user elsewhere? —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-20

MediaWiki message delivery 22:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Deprotecting [[Disgusting]]

The vandalism on the page Disgusting was largely done by sockpuppets of a single user that are now banned; does this still need protection? Stockhausenfan (talk) 18:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

''The Signpost'': 14 May 2025

{{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-05-14}}

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi The Anome. Thank you for your work on Great British Energy Bill. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Seems like a notable subject; and sources are decent. But does it run afoul of WP:NOTNEWS? Seems like it is unfolding now, and maybe the article should wait until it is passed?}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Noleander}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

:This is a special case; not only is it in the news, but it's guaranteed to become of lasting notability. As a bill that has passed parliamentary scrutiny, it will now become law, probably within days. When that happens, it will only need an article rename and a few words changed to become an article about the Act. Also note that now the bill has been passed by Parliament, its wording cannot change in the slightest, except through legislation, so any content about the bill is guaranteed to be in the Act. — The Anome (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Great British Energy Act 2025]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Great British Energy Act 2025 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great British Energy Act 2025 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Landpin (talk) 10:30, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Removal of vote at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great British Energy Act 2025]]

Did you intentionally remove my vote from the AfD? Diff:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Great_British_Energy_Act_2025&diff=prev&oldid=1290987998 Stockhausenfan (talk) 10:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

:Not intentionally, no! It might be an edit conflict, I'll restore your !vote from history if it was. — The Anome (talk) 10:58, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

::Ah nice thank you! Stockhausenfan (talk) 11:00, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Thanks! Edit conflicts seem to be getting worse recently; the UI now increasingly seems to overwrite other editors' edits without being asked to. — The Anome (talk) 11:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)