User talk:ToadetteEdit#top

Hello there,

Following your request here, see forward the citations for verification. Let me know if any further citation are needed:

Infobed net worth at it's peak

• In the [https://www.calcalist.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3801217,00.html first source] the title litrerally says "on paper, infobed is already worth 1.25 billion $"
• In the [https://www.themarker.com/technation/2019-05-06/ty-article/.premium/0000017f-dfd6-d75c-a7ff-ffdf73d60000 second source], the title explicitly says that infobed reached a worth of "more than a billion $", and in the article itself it is reported that, according to a lawsuit filed by a brokerage firm (Tel Aviv VC), InfiBond conducted a $100 million fundraising round based on a company valuation of $1.25 billion. This claimed valuation is central to the legal dispute, as the firm argues it is owed a 5% commission based on that round. Similar things in the [https://www.news1.co.il/Archive/001-D-405099-00.html third source.]
• In the [https://www.calcalist.co.il/local/articles/0,7340,L-3803576,00.html fourth source], they say that Yoram Kraus is the founder of the firm. The source is mainly about the crisis the firm was facing by that time, and it dedicates a background paragraph for its worth at its peak.

Kraus' involvement in Sela Kapital (a publicly traded Israeli REIT managing income-producing real estate, with a market cap of ₪2.1 billion (May 2025)

• [https://www.psakdin.co.il/Court/%D7%AA%D7%A0-%D7%92-8095-09-15-%D7%A7-%D7%A8-%D7%A0-%D7%90-%D7%91%D7%A2-%D7%9E-%D7%A0-%D7%A1%D7%9C%D7%A2-%D7%A7%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%98%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%98-%D7%91%D7%A2-%D7%9E-%D7%95%D7%90%D7%97 The fifth source] is a court decision in a request to affirm a derivative lawsuit against the company by a shareholder. The court specifically explains Karus' involvement in the factual background in the third section: "Factual Background Background to the Establishment of the Fund 3. The management company was established pursuant to a founders’ agreement dated December 2006, signed between Respondents 2–3 and 9, and another individual named Yoram Kraus (whose shares were purchased by the management company in August 2009 and who is therefore not relevant to this matter – see Appendix 16 to the Fund’s response). In June 2007, the management company incorporated the fund as a private company."
• Sources 6–8 all address the specific matters for which they were cited. Source 7 is the official court decision appointing a trustee, while sources 6 and 8 are media reports from the Israeli press.
• Sources 9-10 are israeli media articles about the product Infobed was aspiring to develop, and that's their only subject.
• The 11th source is the site of Ogen (the NGO he founded with Daniella Paz and others). You are correct that the site does not specifically says Kraus is the founder, but this appears [https://www.kibbutz.org.il/he/articles/%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%9C%D7%A7%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A2-%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%92%D7%9F-%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%9B%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9D-%D7%A9%D7%90%D7%97%D7%A8%D7%99 here], and also in Kraus' [https://www.linkedin.com/in/yoramkraus/?originalSubdomain=il linkdin profile].
• The 12th may not be considered "reliable" (as it's a marketing content), but as I stated before - this section is about the subject's hobbies, and I included this information because it adds texture to the article and is not of significant weight; in any case, hobbies are rarely documented by "neutral" or scholarly sources. --Amir Segev Sarusi (talk) 18:08, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Amir Segev Sarusi, thank you for putting forward the sources for review. If you think that the sources have significant coverage, you can include them in the article, and then you can resubmit it for review. I do not have enough time to review all of the sources now. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 20:38, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

::Hi there, did as you requested and they were unfortunately declined. Can you please leave any remark regarding the issues still on the table? I want to finish this article before proceeding to others. --Amir Segev Sarusi (talk) 14:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:::@Amir Segev Sarusi, I have no idea why it was declined, but you should significantly address the concerns raised and resubmit. I am currently away, so I will review it at 15:30 UTC at the earliest. Meanwhile, can you explain what you did? ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

{{outdent}}I have just taken a look of the draft and I see that it was "properly" declined due to notability concerns. From the look of the sources in question it is clear that most sources in the draft are focused more heavily towards the companies and not about the person. And so you will need to cite sources with significant depth about him so that you can prove that the subject is notable. ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you for the constructive feedback. I will conduct a follow-up review. --Amir Segev Sarusi (talk) 09:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Just letting you know I’ve made improvements. Open to suggestions. Truthsojourned (talk) 12:21, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Truthsojourned, what do you mean? I have not looked at your draft yet, and you also put the page in the mainspace as a test edit. I think it has now been moved to the draftspace, so I will take a look. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 12:31, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

::.... and it has been declined (at Draft:Metro9,). You should be providing reliable sources with significantly coverage that is independent of the subject to be used on the draft, to show that the subject meets notability guidelines. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 12:36, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Thank you, @ToadetteEdit, for taking the time to review the draft.

:::I understand your concern regarding the need for reliable, independent sources with significant coverage. I’ve since revised the draft to better meet notability standards by incorporating third-party references, including festival recognitions, music journalism reviews, and academic citations where available. These include:

:::Kansas City Experimental Arts Review – documenting the Best Experimental Feature award

:::Buzzslayers interview – independent music review and commentary on the film’s artistic style

:::TransHuman Cinema Fest Berlin Archive – festival jury recognition

:::I’m continuing to source and format additional references that demonstrate Metro9's cultural and artistic impact within independent film circuits and experimental media communities.

:::If there are specific areas still falling short (e.g., formatting, citation templates, or further third-party depth), I’d greatly appreciate your guidance so I can improve the draft accordingly. Thank you again for your time and feedback.Truthsojourned (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

::::@Truthsojourned, the draft will be declined again if you present these three sources. The interview does not contribute to notability as a non-independent voice is used, and the other sources are, while offline, directly from the respective entities. They may or may not discuss the subject in significant depth, but it would be useful if you link them to the websites if available so that editors can easily verify the statement without digging for the online sites. Hope that helps. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 14:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

Thank you for reviewing the article Barbara Joyce Peake (1925 - 2025).

Could you please assist with further guidance on the content that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. I've read the instructions and added citations to books and websites but wondering if there is any specific improvements you could suggest? Bec Bottomley (talk) 21:28, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

I've also updated the citations to group duplicates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bec Bottomley (talk • contribs) 22:10, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Bec Bottomley, you'll need to cite the unsourced parts of the article, i.e., each statement should have a citation in the end of the paragraph which correspond. You may want to read WP:Citing sources further. If you feel that you have addressed the concerns raised, you can resubmit it for review; but ensure that at least two sources that are reliable, independent, and has significantly coverage, so that the subject meets the notability guidelines for people. ToadetteEdit (talk) 05:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your review! I've added one more company profile (see footnote 9). Does this suffice now? Viljowf (talk) 06:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Viljowf, company profiles do not contribute towards notability as per WP:CORPTRIV. ToadetteEdit (talk) 06:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::Hi ToadetteEdit, sorry I misspoke: I meant news articles covering the company. Please see fn. 9 and fn. 15 Viljowf (talk) 07:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:::@Viljowf, I'll review it later; I am currently in the process of creating a new article. Meanwhile, you can resubmit the draft so that someone else can review it. ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::::I understand, thank you, I'd appreciate it whenever you have the time. Viljowf (talk) 09:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Dear ToadetteEdit,

First and foremost, thank you for taking the time to review and comment on the draft titled Teo A. Khing Design Consultants (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Teo_A._Khing_Design_Consultants). I write in return as I remain confused, and by extension frustrated, that continuing efforts to meet several previous recommendations has not meet requirements once again. So write in the hope that you will be kind enough to talk plainly with me rather than sending a Wikipedia link in response. This outcome, while well intended, is not helping resolve mattes. No doubt the error is on my part.

The issue I remain most unclear about relates to the 'quality of sources' being used with the reservations listing a requirement for multiple sources to be (i) in depth, (ii), reliable, (iii) secondary, (iv) strictly independent. This recommendation was been raised prior to your review and it has been reiterated again.

Links within the Wikipedia site were studied at length prior to the submission you reviewed and two detailed feature articles were sourced with the help of a national publication in Malaysia that ran them. The subject of the draft is a Malaysian company. The links to these two features were both included in the updated submission and also shared in the explanation for the most recent changes to ensure they were acknowledged and read by future editors, in this case you.

The feature articles are in depth, reliable, secondary and come from an independent source. As such, the expectation had been that requirements had been met.

May I please confirm with you if the links to these two feature articles were received and accessible? (They are behind a paywall but I assume Wikipedia is not impeded by this.)

Secondly, if there is an issue with these two specific articles can I please be told very clearly what it is. No feelings will be hurt. If there is an issue elsewhere with sources in the draft, can I please be advised very directly what it is as I'm not aware of it.

Reading texts or notes can be misleading so I do want to be clear, there is no 'tone' here, there is no intended rudeness, there is only the hope that I can work with you to resolve this so that (1) I'm not continuing to clog up in boxes for editors and (2) so that a worthy addition to Wikipedia can be included in its library of content.

I look forward to hearing from you further and sincerely hope that, with your assistance, this can be satisfactorily resolved.

Thank you in advance. Blackgoldsiro (talk) 08:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Blackgoldsiro, first and foremost thing, this message is actually LLM output. Second, aside from these two paywalled sources (which are allowed to be used as sources), the others do not establish the subject's notability. As those two sources are behind the paywall, it might be that the first one focuses on the founder (?) and not fully focused on the company itself. This leaves us with the other source, but this is not enough. So the suggestion would be to add at least one other source with significant coverage, then you can resubmit the draft for review. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::ToadetteEdit,

::Thank you for getting back to me quickly. It is certainly appreciated. I'll look into this further. There is something of a challenge in that the founder and chairman has often been the source interviewed and the features have naturally centred around 'the journey' of him setting up a company that has become an international success. That said, I take on your point and appreciate you spelling it out clearly. Blackgoldsiro (talk) 08:39, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Its other faults aside, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Konstantin_Anisimovich_Pavlov&diff=prev&oldid=1293430949 this draft is not a BLP]. DS (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:@DragonflySixtyseven, the decline reason is used in other topics, let aside BLPs; used when there is a list of references but no or insufficient inline citation. Otherwise, it would have also been declined as improperly sourced by the way. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::{{reply|ToadetteEdit}} reading through the AFC instructions I'm fairly certain that the ILC decline is just for BLPs; if you click the decline reason it takes you to our in-line citations policy which is for BLPs and controversal topics. Best, CoconutOctopus talk 17:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:::@CoconutOctopus, yeah, I see not, but it would be a bit misleading to decline a draft as improperly sourced when there is a list of general references. I will keep that in mind though! ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Love this community of writers and editors. You recently rejected my article and I'd like to know more about how I can get this published. Wildboyconcepts (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Wildboyconcepts, the topics sources do not demonstrate that the subject is notable in any way. The sources are mainly profiles and otherwise reviews of his work, which is not significant any way. A novel featured in a review and a podcast does not mean that the subject meets the last criterion of the notability for authors. I could only see [https://queenannenews.com/news/2014/mar/03/author-antonio-hopson-taps-into-his-south-end-heri/#:~:text=The%20experience%20yielded%20a%20treasure,the%20scariest%20hick%20bar%20in only one source] that establishes the notability, but that is not enough. So please add at least one (or preferably two) more sources that are reliable, independent and with significant coverage. Hope that helps. ToadetteEdit (talk) 04:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you. Which one in the article do you think is a reliable, independent source with significant coverer age? I will use more of those. Wildboyconcepts (talk) 14:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:::@Wildboyconcepts, I currently am away so I could not find the sources, but you can use the search engine to find the valid sources, and then add them into the article. ToadetteEdit (talk) 15:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks very much for reading my article on Peter J. Howard, even if rejected. It's my first for Wikipedia. My query: is there a "fatal flaw" with this living-person subject (a highly regarded university professor and author of numerous books and articles on landscape theory) if no mainstream media have interviewed him, and therefore no newspaper or other secondary-source articles can be cited? I have accurately cited the subject's books and articles, and the single, published academic source I found is included. Any suggestions you can offer (including whether I should potentially abandon this subject) are welcome! Thank you. Lonepine0204 (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Lonepine0204, the notability standards require at least two sources that are independent (i.e. not written by themselves), secondary (i.e. not from the affiliated institute's website) and have significant depth in the context. Or if the user meets one of the criteria of notability for academics without needing those source but it would be preferred if you add these sources into the draft. Hope that helps. ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you very much for pointing me to 'notability for academics'. I will see if that sorts out my article's dilemma! Lonepine0204 (talk) 17:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $250 worth of prizes for architectural articles. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Dr. Blofeld, year thanks for the invitation, though. However, I am technically unable to participate due to a topic ban from most of the project space, since joining would require editing a page in that namespace. I look forward to expanding a few stubs if I have time, and I will hopefully join another if there is one in the near future. And yeah, I am not interested in any monetary prizes in the meanwhile. ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:01, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

It is done@ToadetteEdit Sunhighway27 (talk) 21:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC) Sunhighway27 (talk) 21:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Sunhighway27, please follow up on your talk page concerning your disruptive attempt to promote the pages into mainspace. ToadetteEdit (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::I wasn't trying to promote myself Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::so is it an article yet Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Article? You have not yet edited the two declined drafts (in one case also rejected). They are still WP:DRAFTs, and you are not attempting to promote yourself (far from your intended creation?) And if you can not find any SIGCOV article on Google or any other search engine, it is better for you to just leave those draft and edit somewhere; anything that interests you most. So you have two choices: either to pick another notable topic to write about, or continue to push these two drafts to mainspace, which might get you blocked if done disruptively. It is your choice, and I am not obligated to choose for you. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:39, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::sorry I meant draft Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:49, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::did you mean: anything Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:50, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::also I can find stuff on it, but I want more so it isn't a stub Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::why are you so angry Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:51, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::I am not angry, I am trying to help you but you appear to not get my idea about it. And yes, anything that interests you (I personally write about locations in Egypt, but I might also create articles on mobile phones). If you can find stuff about it, you can just add it, and ask for help resubmitting the draft. And stubs can always be expanded if more information can be found. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::I knew you like the Egypt area, I like the Franklin county area.(I live there). Sunhighway27 (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Any then you can improve existing articles related to Franklin County, Missouri, and heck, the article on the county itself has notices that say that more sources are need. You can find that sources to back up that claims in that article. This is a meaningful way to contribute to Wikipedia. Is there any other interests that come to mind? ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::yes that is my plan Sunhighway27 (talk) 19:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::I am apart of the destubaton Sunhighway27 (talk) 19:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::are you Sunhighway27 (talk) 19:11, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::You can see the thread right above this one. I attempted to join a backlog drive, then requested one to make the edits for me, but then got declined due to WP:PROXYING. So do not even think that you should add my name to it. In short, I am unable to join due to the topic ban. ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::sorry for you Sunhighway27 (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::I wont add your name, that is rude Sunhighway27 (talk) 19:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
• History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
• An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{tl|Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)}}

Hello Brother! I want help about one article, I adding from government official website here on wikipedia article, that is correct data but some accounts come again and again adding wrong, incorrect, misinformation and quoting wrong person with wrong name, please take action what to do? --ThinkTankResearcher (talk) 07:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

:Hello @ThinkTankResearcher. I do not understand by the "one article"; what are you referring to? If you think that the edits are wrong, you can always revert it (using the undo functionality), but you should first understand the policies and guidelines first, and also see Help:Getting started, before reverting other's edits. Alternately, you can also raise up the concerns on the article's talk page. And the teahouse is always here to help you. Happy editing! ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

::no brother article is Second Shehbaz Sharif government, I revert them 4 5 times, brother 4, 5 times already, they change it back, and currently you can check there is wrong information present, How many times I revert it back, they come back again and change it back, take action and block them, I adding data from official government website, it can't be wrong. ThinkTankResearcher (talk) 07:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

:::I have restored the article to the version of your most recent undo. From looking at the history of the article, I see a series of edits from an IP user who is currently blocked from editing due to general disruption across multiple articles related to Pakistani politics. And I do see a few good faith edits from a user which got reverted by an IP (same?). If issues persist, you can seek help from an administrator; but preferably you should start a discussion on the article's talk page. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

::::right right, excellent man you did good Thank you so much and yeah you are that IP user did temper the articles of different pakistan politicians, I am credible responsibles so i want latest correct information here. Thanks again ThinkTankResearcher (talk) 06:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)