User talk:ToadetteEdit#top

@Voorts and @HouseBlaster were very clear in User_talk:ToadetteEdit/Archive_9#unblock_2. Talking about project space in userspace User_talk:Floquenbeam#Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/LaundryPizza03, and I am posting here because I cannot post there User_talk:LaundryPizza03#RfA is not editing in good faith and you know better than this. Please do not continue this, or you will likely be re-blocked. Focus on content, not project space discussions. Star Mississippi 17:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

:I think I was confused on that, given that I just made so before you posted, so let that be the last comment that I make. The unblock condition did not imply that I could discuss projectspace anywhere on the network. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

::Glad to hear you understand and will not comment further. Blocked from project space means you are not allowed to participate in those discussions. Period. That includes discussing them in other spaces. Star Mississippi 17:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Wait! But the decision that I can not make comments related to projectspace is not mentioned (or discussed) at all in the thread so maybe this decision has been taken out of nowhere and immediately applied in action.

:::Irrelevant of this section, is there any way to avoid reading projectspace. It is like every day I open a Wikipedia: page. Yesterday, an RfA opened, and I can not even forget that. I just get the impression to return to the community engaging with them, but I am facing a barrier that prevents me from doing so. This way, I could pay more attention to content and maintenance tasks and not focus on any talk archives. I will attempt to return by the end of this year if everything goes well from today on. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

::::@ToadetteEdit @Voorts' unblock said {{tq|An indefinite topic ban from Wikipedia: and Wikipedia talk: spaces, broadly construed, with the following exceptions, which are to be narrowly construed:}} this means you are not allowed to be a part of wikipedia space with the exceptions of limited situations. Discussing an RFA which you are not allowed to participate in is included in the restriction without any doubt.

::::I would not recommend even reading project space until much closer to when you think you will make a successful request to lift your restrictions, but obviously that cannot be restricted. Please focus on content, which is why we're here. Star Mississippi 17:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::Oh, I understand, I must have forgotten this piece of policy: {{tq|discussions or suggestions [...] anywhere on Wikipedia, [...] but also including edit summaries and the user's own user and talk pages}} I will rather focus on the front side of Wikipedia and return if I have the feeling to. ToadetteEdit (talk) 06:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, how do I edit the title? I can't get rid of the "Draft:" in the title --Giæver (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

:@Giæver, you can move the page; see Help:Moving a page ToadetteEdit (talk) 06:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello ToadetteEdit, I'm not fully sure about the etiquette of deprodding but I thought it was more polite to say something than nothing -- I noticed your prod of Trevor Hoppe because I was watching the creator's talk page; I don't disagree about NPROF or GNG, but I think there's a case to be made for WP:NAUTHOR since all three books pass WP:NBOOK. Based on that argument, I thought it was ambiguous enough to merit an AfD for consensus before deletion. Thanks for your patrolling work. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

:@LEvalyn, I did review the NAUTHOR before prodding, so I have no issues. But it seems that notability I'd dubious based on the two books that the subject wrote, since there are several reviews that make the author notable per criterion #3 of NAUTHOR. I will check this article late to see whether it should be deleted or not. ToadetteEdit (talk) 11:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello thank you i appreciate that I'll keep on that --Lesegothami (talk) 06:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

:@Lesegothami, I appreciate your thanks, but please note that thanking users in a short duration of time, for random edits, only goes to being disruptive and will most likely lead to a block. You may find help:Getting started helpful. ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)