User talk:Void if removed#top
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Rebecca Wait|Rebecca Wait]] (October 15)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Please find sources other than the first four (primary) and the last four (reviews by Guardian).}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebecca Wait and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Rebecca_Wait Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asparagusus&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rebecca_Wait reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
—asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 16:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
| style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Void if removed!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 16:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
Wikipedia library
Has anyone pointed you at Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library? -- Colin°Talk 07:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
:Yes I got access to that last week - it is a thing of beauty! Void if removed (talk) 09:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
:And I will have a look at creating a GC draft article like you suggested, as soon as I can. If nothing else, it would serve as a discussion point. Void if removed (talk) 10:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Rebecca Wait]] has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Rebecca_Wait help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
asilvering (talk) 18:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Dead Lions|Dead Lions]] (January 18)
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=I think you could find more sourcing that would satisfy the requirements at WP:NBOOK, but I also think it's better to make a single article on the entire Slough House series. There is almost no information about the series on Mick Herron's biography article, but it's unquestionably notable since it's the basis for the Slow Horses series. If you decide to go that route, feel free to message me on my talk page if you want me to review the draft.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dead Lions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Dead_Lions Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asilvering&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dead_Lions reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
asilvering (talk) 20:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Cass-review-logo.svg
Thanks for uploading :File:Cass-review-logo.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:Screenshot 2024-04-11 at 10.33.03.png]]
The file :File:Screenshot 2024-04-11 at 10.33.03.png has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
:Void, I think you could put that up for {{tl|db-author}}. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding [[Draft:Slough House (book series)]]
File:Information.svg Hello, Void if removed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Slough House (book series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, [[Draft:Dead Lions]]
Hello, Void if removed. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dead Lions".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3ADead+Lions request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - November 2024
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Newsletter/November 2024}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Article titles on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Catnip on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Len Blavatnik on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:ONE Championship on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Imelda Marcos on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:The Man Who Laughs on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:List of Love Island (2015 TV series) contestants on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Dilation and evacuation on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:2028 United States presidential election on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Coatings?
So, have you switched your obsession from The Topic I Must Not Mention Here to coatings? Seems like it from your recent edits. Any juicy culture wars going on in that field? Any coating coatracks among those articles? *Dan T.* (talk) 17:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
:I decided reading about paint drying was more interesting. Void if removed (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Jeffersonian democracy on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Katy Perry on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Welcome back!
It’s good to see you editing again. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
:Thanks, just can't keep away... :) Void if removed (talk) 10:15, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (film) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Advice on problems with the transgender health care misinformation page
Hi, I saw and agreed with your comment on the manufactured uncertainty issue at Talk:Transgender health care misinformation. The more I examine that page the more issues I find, often with the article going beyond what the sources say. However, I'm aware that it's a fraught topic and also a page that's already been heavily litigated in the reviews etc.
I wanted to ask if you think that it would be a mistake to raise these issues now (while the manufactured uncertainty discussion is ongoing)? Or better just to put it all out there?
I've written up in rough some issues I found just by checking the claims attributed to a couple of sources, if you want to see. At this rate, I'm a bit pessimistic that the rest will hold up to scrutiny, but I'm concerned that if I go in and start raising multiple points at once, hackles will rise and lines will be drawn. Samuelshraga (talk) 10:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
:My experience of this area is that there is a tangled nest of topics where a local consensus has been arrived that that I, personally, think is overly confident and doesn't really convey the range of clinical opinion. The history and talk pages at ROGD, Gender exploratory therapy, Gender dysphoria in children and Detransition for starters show how I think overly-certain pictures of extremely conflicted evidence have been assembled. However, I am in a small minority in thinking so and so there's little point relitigating - but to me the misinformation page subsequently brought together many of the issues on those pages also, as well as multiple arguments across RS and FRINGE boards.
:Every single one of these is an area of legitimate clinical disagreement, and using a source like SPLC or Wuest & Last or McNamara et al as a basis for framing alternative viewpoints as misinformation on a subject that requires MEDRS should never have been permitted IMO, meaning the page is fatally flawed - yet it has been given GA status and now aiming for a DYK spotlight.
:I'd suggest testing the water with a point or two, see if you get anywhere or if the lines are already drawn too rigidly and it just becomes exhausting and futile. Void if removed (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Femosphere on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Void if removed. Thank you. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Canada and Talk:Muffin on "All RFCs" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
File:Internet-group-chat.svgYour feedback is requested at Talk:Pope Leo XIV on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Arbcom notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.