User talk:WeAllSeekTheTruth#top

File:Information.svg Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to :Aston Francis have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

{{clear}}

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [{{User:ClueBot NG/Warnings/FPReport|4132308}} report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aston Francis was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aston+Francis&diff=1072425869&oldid=1069158183 changed] by WeAllSeekTheTruth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881457 on 2022-02-17T17:29:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to :Aston Francis, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -Toast (talk) 17:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop adding your own personal analysis or commentary to this article. We go by what the sources say, and they do not support your wording. Your changes to the article count as WP:OR and, more egregiously, are not WP:NPOV. — Czello 17:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

:i think your sources are flawed. I will add my sources next time i get around to changing the wording. both the west and china have their own definitions of democracy and whether or not they consider themselves democratic. ignoring the chinese claim to being a democracy and condemning them to being "not a democracy" simply because western sources say so is rather poor academia. WeAllSeekTheTruth (talk) 22:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

::We don't ignore sources because of where they're from, that's biased editing. Ultimately we have sources that we consider to be reliable (and the author's nationality is irrelevant to this) and we state what they state. Which is the fact that China is not democratic. — Czello 07:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:::China is democratic though, they just are not a liberal democracy. It is insane to say that only the Western, liberal styled democracy is "democratic". Soviet styled democracy, the one China adheres to, is democratic, and I would argue more democratic. It is fine to report both sides, which is what we should do. The West makes a claim, and China makes a claim. The simple fact is China is democratic, because democracy can take multiple different forms. WeAllSeekTheTruth (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

::::Soviet "democracy" is by and large not considered a democracy except in their own words. Wikipedia works on WP:INDEPENDENT sources, and independent sources largely agree that China is a totalitarian dictatorship. We don't give equal weight to their own self-description, as that would be WP:FALSEBALANCE. — Czello 14:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:::::this is why https://www.ecured.cu/EcuRed:Enciclopedia_cubana is superior to this hell site WeAllSeekTheTruth (talk) 17:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

::::::Then you should take your edits there. — Czello 17:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:::::::fuck you lmao WeAllSeekTheTruth (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to :Taiwan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. See the top of Talk:Taiwan – Wikipedia has established consensus that Taiwan is a country. ClaudineChionh (talk – contribs) 14:19, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

:it is just a matter of fact the chinese taipei is a province of china, but yall at wikipedia do be drinking the koolaid WeAllSeekTheTruth (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

::As a bit of advice, I suggest you do read WP:NPOV and also WP:AGENDA or WP:AXE. Most of your edits and comments so far have been pro-CCP or tankie talking points. You've suggested several times that you don't like Wikipedia - if you decide to remain here while being openly hostile to other editors and the project at large, all the while promoting Chinese communist propaganda, you'll quickly find your account blocked from editing. — Czello 17:12, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Czello 15:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)