User talk:Ytzesza

Nomination of [[:Diamonds (Lil Peep and iLoveMakonnen album)]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Diamonds (Lil Peep and iLoveMakonnen album), to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/{{urlencode:Diamonds (Lil Peep and iLoveMakonnen album)|WIKI}} significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamonds (Lil Peep and iLoveMakonnen album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

April 2022

File:Information.svg Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to :Dispatch (band), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 20:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Lil Tjay, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 20:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Hello, I'm PhantomTech. I noticed that in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mojave%20%28album%29&diff=1095341247 this edit] to :Mojave (album), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Dinosaur (Disney's Animal Kingdom). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Dr.Pinsky. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tipper%20Gore&diff=1104202518 this edit] to :Tipper Gore—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 11:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Standard notice

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

}} Dr.Pinsky (talk) 11:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Aimee Osbourne.jpg

Thanks for uploading :File:Aimee Osbourne.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:File:Aimee Osbourne.jpg]]

File:Copyright-problem.svg

A tag has been placed on :File:Aimee Osbourne.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/music/ozzy-daughter-admits-tune-siblings-article-1.2352658. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 15:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Sources?

Hi. I reverted your edit on Pantera. If you read the article and looked at the most recent events + the Members section, you'd see that they are technically active since 2022.

Regardless, I'm posting on your talk page about something else. You've made 169 edits since late April, yet, 48 of them have been reverted. That's nearly half of your edits. Most importantly, out of those 169 edits, you have not cited a single source. For something minor like correcting grammar or adding something that's obvious, a source probably isn't needed, but for other substantial additions, it is needed. See here. Just trying to give you a heads up before you get blocked. Xanarki (talk) 00:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Hey so the reason I don’t use sources for all of it is cuz I don’t know how to cite it on here. And most of my edits were things I knew were correct. Some were fixing stuff too like I fixed shout at the devil on the page cuz if u pressed the song it would redirect to ur current page so I removed the Ytzesza (talk) 00:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

:Hi, you can learn about referencing at Help:Referencing for beginners. Wikipedia has a policy on verifiability, all information in articles should be supported by reliable sources. PhantomTech[talk] 01:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

File:Information orange.svg Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Patient Number 9, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. HorrorLover555 (talk) 02:46, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on :Patient Number 9. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. PhantomTech[talk] 02:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at :Patient Number 9, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop calling other editors names. Remain civil and use the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

I wasn’t harassing someone Ytzesza (talk) 05:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

:Yes you did. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patient_Number_9&type=revision&diff=1109295455&oldid=1109294760 Here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patient_Number_9&diff=next&oldid=1109295455 here]. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at :Live Evil (Black Sabbath album). - FlightTime (open channel) 05:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

That was on accident it’s a discography for the band only tho so I was tryna move it and it fucked it up and I didn’t know how to fix it. Ytzesza (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Also do u know if I’m allowed to have multiple accounts on Wikipedia? I won’t do anything bad just want an alt account for like school or public Wi-Fi cuz ion wanna be tracked Ytzesza (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at :Wild Side (Mötley Crüe song), you may be blocked from editing. Sources must show the song meets WP:NSONG MB 03:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

I’m not disrupting Wikipedia. I will source whatever is needed to be sourced in that article just don’t make it a redirect

Ytzesza (talk) 20:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at :Kurt Cobain. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PhilKnight (talk) 11:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Editwarring

File:Ambox warning pn.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on :Patient Number 9. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:46, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

New message from FlightTime

{{talkback|User talk:FlightTime|Patient Number 9|ts=03:08, 9 September 2022 (UTC)}}

- FlightTime (open channel) 03:08, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Motley cruewildside.jpg

Thanks for uploading :File:Motley cruewildside.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:TheMob.Rules.jpg

Thanks for uploading :File:TheMob.Rules.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at :Black Sabbath. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to :City Girls, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schläger4 (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

The article isn’t notable at alk Ytzesza (talk) 19:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

:{{ping|Ytzesza}} would you please explain why the City Girls aren't notable enough for an article? —VersaceSpace 🌃 20:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Explain how it is are notable Ytzesza (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

:That's trolling, but also an easy question to answer. They have two charting albums and at least five charted songs in the US (as seen here). This makes them notable per WP:NMUSICIAN's second criteria. Only one criteria has to be met, but the others are met too: The duo has been discussed in reliable sources, so they meet criteria one as well. They have Gold and Platinum records, so they meet criteria three too. They've released multiple records through an important record label (Capitol Records), so criteria 5 is met. They've been nominated for BET and Billboard Music Awards, criteria eight is met. They're important figures in southern hip hop, criteria 7 is met. They've had several singles sent to radio, criteria 11 is met. They've been on a notable tour with Jack Harlow, criteria 4 is met. Now, would you please explain how they are not notable? Thank you. —VersaceSpace 🌃 00:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheMob.Rules.jpg

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:TheMob.Rules.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 22:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

How long is the block?? Ytzesza (talk) 22:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

:One week. Given your track record, I feel obliged to warn you that this is probably the last block you will receive with an expiration date. I suggest you tread very carefully when the block expires. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

I wasn’t trying to be disruptive I honestly thought it was ok to make it a redirect I am really sorry. How do I use the unblock template Ytzesza (talk) 23:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

:You have a wall of warnings on your page indicating bad editing habits and or a very poor grasp of our policies and guidelines. I think you would do well to spend the next week reviewing our guidelines for editing with an emphasis on WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:RS and WP:GNG. But if you want to appeal the block, you can copy and paste the template in the notice above, below this comment. Be sure to include a clear statement that you understand why you have been blocked, how you are going to correct the problematic editing and what you intend to work on. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed |1=Was not trying to be disruptive. I just didn’t think city girls were not notable and I am sorry for that. They are just not that known I guess. I won’t do that again if you unblock me and I’ll source everything I do. I meant no harm making the article a redirect. |decline = It's hard to believe you actually thought that, given apparently platinum-certified singles and no fewer than 50 references on that page. Frankly, I'm not buying it. I mean, I hadn't heard of them either, but there's zero chance I'd have claimed they were non-notable, given that article. Frankly, if you weren't trying to be disruptive, we need to immediately block you indefinitely because you lack sufficient competence to continue editing Wikipedia. If you were trying to be disruptive, please take this week to decide if you're willing to knock it off and contribute constructively going forward. Yamla (talk) 10:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)}}

also why do u think the next block will be perminate? I’ve had one other block before this Ytzesza (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

  • Suggesting that the City Girls aren't known (followed by a redirect to Lil Uzi Vert) is either trolling, misogyny, or both. Continue going down this path and you can expect an indefinite block. —VersaceSpace 🌃 00:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

I legit didn’t know Ytzesza (talk) 00:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Also responded to wrong message Ytzesza (talk) 00:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HorrorLover555 (talk) 18:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

File:Stop x nuvola.svg
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ytzesza. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)