User talk: YoungForever

Where in the MOS:TVCAST does it say that their last names cannot be mentioned? I read the entire thing and didn't see a reason for my edit's removal. ESPECIALLY, if it's reliably sourced? If it's about the "on-screen credits" of the series, they don't list character names for main cast members or guest stars.... ACase0000 (talk) 04:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

:Per MOS:TVCAST, {{tq|All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source.}} They are credited with first names only and that is their common names. It is fake wedding invitation created by the characters for the TV series. It is not a press release nor an article written by a staff member. — YoungForever^(talk) 04:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

::Again... NO character names are Credited on-screen for main cast and guest stars! The credits don't say "Nicola Cavendish as Connie", they just list the actors name. And as for the article It was written by Netflix staff and they own the rights to the series. Fictional characters cannot write their own wedding invitations, you should know that. Series staff members wrote it. ACase0000 (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

:::Again, Connie is her common name and her surname is not part of her common name. Again, it is a fake wedding invitation {{tq|by Melinda Monroe and Jack Sheridan}} as stated on the fake wedding invitation. What part of a fake wedding invitation you do not seem to understand? It is not a press release nor an article written by a staff member, it is just a fake wedding invitation with questions to answer. — YoungForever^(talk) 19:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

::What part of Fictional characters cannot write articles in real life do you not understand? Mel and Jack DID NOT write it. Real people like you and I did, how can you not understand that? Real Netflix employees wrote it. –ACase0000 (talk) 11:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

:::Again, it is a fake wedding invitation, not an article nor a press release. You are clearly beating a dead horse. — YoungForever^(talk) 16:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, JustinBoy203 has added multiple unconfirmed production codes to future episodes from the list of Bob's Burgers episodes page, many of them not having attributed or credible sources. As I have interacted with JustinBoy203 outside of Wikipedia, I believe he thinks some of these production codes come from WGA or it's from his original research. Since I'm not really an editor on Wikipedia, I don't believe I am legitimate enough to dispute the edits by removing it from the page. However, I saw that you messaged the user about similar edits on one of the Simpsons season pages and thought it would be best to message you about it. Arriabella (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

:FYI, WGA do not include production codes at all. It is clearly original research if it is yet to air episodes. The production codes are on the end credits of each episode of Bob's Burgers, The Simpsons, and other adult animated TV series on FOX. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:47, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

::I apologize for the late response, but thank you for removing the production codes. I'd like to add that the "Heist Things Are Heist" episode may not be its name. While there have been similar episode titles, like "Lice Things Are Lice" and "Advice Things are Ad-Nice," the source obscures the title on the script cover. It may not be the first episode in the production season either, as Bob's Burgers have had table reads out of order before. "Pig Trouble in Little Tina" had an earlier table read date than "Motor, She Boat" despite being ahead in production order. Arriabella (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

:::You're welcome. And actually, it kinda does look like that FASA01 is called 'Heist Things Are Heist'. Because in the picture, you'll see that the words '...Are Heist' is covered from the number 15. JustinBoy203 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

::::x.com and Bluesky accounts without verified checkmarks are not reliable sources, FYI. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

I changed the titles as they were depicted on the episodes (on the screen)

KorrektneSisestus (talk) 07:57, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

:{{re|KorrektneSisestus}} Those are not the episode titles. The episode titles are listed on Max FYI. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:37, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, regarding {{diff2|1275450096}}, the Template:Rotten Tomatoes prose can be used for television articles just like it can be for film articles, it can be a controversial template but looks like was added from nothing here {{diff2|1275216166}}, didn't replace existing text so isn't a WP:STYLEVAR issue so seems was a valid use. Indagate (talk) 20:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:The template is discouraged to use as of several weeks and that's the consensus. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::Discouraged but still exists and not deprecated, can be used if users like that IP want and they're not replacing existing text. Indagate (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)