Vancouverism
{{short description|Urban planning philosophy originating in Vancouver, Canada}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{Advert|date=August 2023}}
{{More citations needed|date=August 2023}}
}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2018}}
Image:Concord Pacific Master Plan Area.jpg
File:Vancouver_podium_building_1.JPG
Vancouverism is an urban planning and architectural phenomenon in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. It is characterized by a large residential population living in the city centre in mixed-use developments, typically narrow, high-rise residential towers atop a wide, medium-height commercial base, significant reliance on mass public transit, creation and maintenance of green park spaces, and preserving view corridors.{{cite book |last1=Short |first1=Michael J. |title=Planning for Tall Buildings |date=2012 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |isbn=978-0-415-58107-3 |page=169}}{{cite book |last1=Hiller |first1=Harry H. |title=Host Cities and the Olympics: An interactionist approach |date=2012 |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |isbn=978-0-415-52241-0 |page=157 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-lvd7Nr2CfcC |access-date=August 25, 2014 |ref=hiller}}{{cite web |last1=Chappell |first1=Jim |title=Vancouver's View Corridors: Should San Francisco adopt similar guidelines? |url=http://www.spur.org/publications/article/2003-11-01/vancouvers-view-corridors |publisher=SPUR |access-date=August 25, 2014 |date=November 1, 2003}}[http://designobserver.com/media/pdf/New_Urbanism:__647.pdf Boddy, Trevor 16.2, 2004, U.C. Berkeley journal "Places."]{{cite web |last1=Boddy |first1=Trevor |title=INSIGHT: Vancouverism vs. Lower Manhattanism: Shaping the High Density City |url=http://www.archnewsnow.com/features/Feature177.htm |website=ArchNewsNow.com |publisher=ArchNewsNow |access-date=August 25, 2014 |date=September 20, 2005}}{{cite book |last1=Beasley |first1=Larry |title=Vancouverism |url=https://www.ubcpress.ca/vancouverism |date=2019 |publisher=On Point Press |location=Vancouver |isbn=9780774890311}}{{Citation overkill|reason=6 citations all right next to each other|date=January 2025}}
The architect Bing Thom described Vancouverism this way:{{cite news |url=http://www.cbc.ca/podcasting/pastpodcasts.html?42#ref42 |work=CBC News |title=Past Podcasts – CBC Radio |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080621205940/http://www.cbc.ca/podcasting/pastpodcasts.html?42 |archive-date=June 21, 2008}}
It's a spirit about public space. I think Vancouverites are very, very proud that we built a city that really has a tremendous amount of space on the waterfront for people to recreate and to enjoy. At the same time, False Creek and Coal Harbour were previously industrial lands that were very polluted and desecrated. We've refreshed all of this with new development, and people have access to the water and the views. So, to me, it's this idea of having a lot people living very close together, mixing the uses. So, we have apartments on top of stores. In Surrey we have a university on top of a shopping centre. This mixing of uses reflects Vancouver in terms of our culture and how we live together.{{cite web |last1=Sharma |first1=Ian Alexander Narasimha |title=On the Edge: Redevelopment Projects at the Urban-Marine Interface in Vancouver, BC |url=https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/22515/Sharma_washington_0250O_11050.pdf.txt |publisher=University of Washington |access-date=25 August 2014 |year=2012}}
An important aspect to note is that Vancouverism is an ideal that was developed in Vancouver but is not present in all regions of the city. Additionally, while outlying regions of Metro Vancouver, such as Surrey, have adopted aspects of these ideals, they did not originate outside the city of Vancouver.
Vancouver has been repeatedly ranked among the most livable cities in the world.{{cite web |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/08/28/vancouver-most-livable-city-economist_n_3830039.html |title=Vancouver The Most Livable City In North America: Economist |work=The Huffington Post |date=August 28, 2013 |access-date=January 24, 2014 |quote=Vancouver may be the best place to live in North America, but it has yet to recover from a Vancouver Island highway closure that dropped it to third in the world in 2011.}} An article in San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association has taken note of Vancouver's approach to new development and view corridors and asks if San Francisco should pursue similar direction. However, Vancouver's planning process has come under criticism for its unpredictability, lengthy approval process, lack of transparency, lack of public engagement, the repetitiveness of the built forms it produces, and the potential for the process to involve corruption.{{Cite web |url=https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/vancouver-housing-second-least-affordable-in-world-report |title=Vancouver housing second least affordable in world: report |last=Crawford |first=Tiffany |date=January 22, 2019 |website=Vancouver Sun}}{{Cite web |url=https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/vancouver-most-expensive-housing-market-canada-2019 |title=Vancouver ranked North America's 2nd least affordable city for housing |last=Daily Hive |date=March 28, 2019}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/vancouver-now-ranked-second-least-affordable-global-housing-market-1.23606899 |title=Vancouver now ranked 'second-least affordable' global housing market |last=Connolly |first=Joannah |date=January 21, 2019 |website=Vancouver Courier}}{{Cite web |url=https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2018/07/19/Hard-Questions-Vancouver-Affordability-Approach/ |title=Hard Questions about Vancouver's New Affordability Approach |last=Patrick Condon and Scot Hein |date=July 19, 2019 |website=The Tyee}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.planningreport.com/2017/08/14/learning-vancouver-housing-affordability-myth-supply-side-densification |title=Learning from Vancouver: Housing Affordability & the Myth of Supply-Side Densification |last=Condon |first=Patrick |date=August 14, 2017 |website=The Planning Report}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/BC%20Office/2016/05/CCPA-BC-Affordable-Housing.pdf |title=Getting Serious About Affordable Housing |last=Lee |first=Marc |date=May 2016 |website=Policy Alternatives}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-13/vancouver-continent-s-least-affordable-city-has-a-wage-problem |title=Vancouver's One-Two Punch Is Expensive Homes and Low Wages |last=Pearson |first=Natalie |date=July 13, 2018 |website=Bloomberg}}
Background
Vancouverism developed in part as a product of Vancouver's geographical context. Wedged between the sea, mountains and the border with the United States, the Greater Vancouver Regional District partnered with the area's municipalities to encourage controlled development. Early recognition that British Columbia's farmland would be engulfed by sprawl led to the establishment of the Agricultural Land Reserve in the 1970s. This assisted in containing and intensifying development throughout the Vancouver metropolitan area and the Fraser Valley.
Architect Arthur Erickson is credited by some with developing the concept that became Vancouverism in the mid-1950s, in a never-realized development called "Project 56".{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/vancouver-s-architectural-style-in-spotlight-at-london-exhibit-1.753191 |work=CBC News |title=Vancouver's architectural style in spotlight at London exhibit |date=June 23, 2008}} Many of the principles were incorporated into the development of the West End. The city's planning department, under the direction of Ray Spaxman in the 1980s, began to expand on the concepts, many of which were brought into fruition with the development of the former Expo 86 lands along False Creek and Yaletown.
Another person who is credited with influencing Vancouverism is Jane Jacobs, author of The Death and Life of Great American Cities.{{cite web |url=https://www.straight.com/article-702636/vancouver/sullivanism-vs-jane-jacobs |title=Vancouver's density debate pits Sullivanism versus the ideas of Jane Jacobs |publisher=The Georgia Straight |date=June 7, 2012 |access-date=June 11, 2012 |first=Daniel |last=Wood |quote=She is why international experts come to Vancouver to study its renowned livability. She's the mother of Vancouverism.}} Brent Toderian, the former head of Planning for the City of Vancouver says of Jacobs: "There isn't a person or book more influential in creating 'Vancouverism' than Jane and The Death and Life ... I know what she means about people misunderstanding density – that's why we emphasize density done well rather than density as a mathematical exercise. [But] people 'round the world praise Vancouver's livability, and she had a big hand in it."Wikens, Stephen (May 6, 2011). [https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/jane-jacobs-honoured-in-the-breach/article2013286/print/ Jane Jacobs: Honoured in the breach]. Globe and Mail Retrieved on: May 13, 2011
Aesthetics
One principle associated with Vancouverism, as evidenced by planning policy, involves protecting "view corridors". Vancouver's "View Protection Guidelines" were approved in 1989 and amended in 1990, establishing height limits to protect views of the North Shore Mountains. This approach, while credited with preserving the city's scenic backdrop, has been criticized for lessening visual interest and failing to represent the city's contemporary image. In response, Council commissioned a "Skyline Study" in 1997 which concluded that Vancouver's skyline would benefit from the addition of a handful of buildings exceeding current height limits, to add visual interest to Vancouver's skyline.{{cite web |title=Downtown Vancouver Skyline Study |work=Special Council Meeting Minutes |publisher=City of Vancouver |date=April 7, 1997 |url=http://www.vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/970407/skyline.htm |access-date=April 9, 2018}}
A study found that opportunities for such buildings were restricted due to a limited number of large development sites in the downtown.{{cite web |title=General Policy for Higher Buildings |publisher=City of Vancouver |date=May 6, 1997 |url=http://vancouver.ca/docs/planning/general_policy.pdf}} Eight years later, five of the seven sites identified for higher buildings had been planned or developed. The tallest of the new buildings is the Living Shangri-La hotel/residential tower, which was completed in 2008, and stands 201 metres (659 ft){{cite web |url=http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/ci/bu/sk/li/?id=100997&bt=2&ht=3&sro=1 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050418221930/http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/ci/bu/sk/li/?id=100997&bt=2&ht=3&sro=1 |url-status=usurped |archive-date=April 18, 2005 |title=Vancouver High-rise buildings (in feet) |publisher=Emporis Buildings |access-date=February 6, 2007}} tall (62 stories).{{cite web |url=http://www.emporis.com/building/livingshangrila-vancouver-canada |title=Living Shangri-La, Vancouver |website=Emporis Buildings |access-date=December 10, 2009 |archive-date=November 4, 2012 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104164015/http://www.emporis.com/building/livingshangrila-vancouver-canada }}
File:TransLink_SkyTrain_departs_Stadium-Chinatown_station_in_Vancouver,_British_Columbia,_Canada.png
Transportation Infrastructure
Vancouver's street grid is finely-meshed, with mid-block lanes, which has allowed the city to easily densify and promotes walkability.{{Cite book|last=City of Vancouver|url=https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/transportation-2040-plan.pdf|title=TRANSPORTATION 2040|year=2020|pages=22}} The overhead, visible, grade separated SkyTrain transit system is an integral part of the aesthetic of Vancouverism.
Planning process
One of the circumstances allowing the development of Vancouverism was the discretionary planning process implemented by the city. The planning process of Vancouver is based on collaboration by aligning the development goals of the city prior to determining the particular actions for individual drivers.[http://www.metrovancouver.org/planning/development/strategy/Pages/designations.aspx RGS Goals and Strategies]. Metrovancouver.org (July 29, 2011). Retrieved on 2014-04-12. Following the extended public outcry over a freeway and development program known as Project 200, Vancouver voted The Electors' Action Movement (TEAM) into power. TEAM ran on a platform of implementing more stringent design criteria and oversight to city developments. Development along South False Creek is the ideal urban form advocated by TEAM. The South False Creek development is characterized by low-density, mixed use and mixed-income residential properties with a high level of access to amenities. As well as favouring the urban form found along South False Creek, TEAM implemented significant reforms to the planning process. Discretionary planning allows the automatic approval of small developments that conform to the existing building codes. Larger projects are subject to the design review of the planning department. The planning department is empowered to make decisions that will force developments to conform to certain design guidelines.
Sustainable development
Sustainable development refers to solutions that not only benefit the present population, but also the future generations as well. This type of development requires looking at the consequences of decisions, which lead to solutions, and the consequences of those consequences too. Vancouver planners have been looking ahead of their current problems and solutions for decades. An example of this foresight can be seen in Vancouver's zoning regulations maintaining set-backs and sight-lines; and rejecting the downtown freeway, in which the city sacrificed initial gains for smaller long-term benefits and neighbourhood preservation—a trade-off that benefit current residents and later generations as well. Current issues revolve around finite energy sources and their impacts on the environment. These problems have led Vancouver to outline a growth strategy that considers the environment and community.
Criticism
{{POV section|date=June 2019}}
Vancouver's planning process and Vancouverism have been widely criticized, including by prominent members of the planning and architectural communities in Vancouver, such as Patrick Condon, Scot Hein and Bing Thom, for a variety of reasons. Development potential on a site is typically divided into two categories, "outright" and "discretionary". Outright development is clearly defined in terms of use, height, and floor area and can proceed along a faster track than discretionary; however, the outright development potential is less than the discretionary track. Outright limitations may include lower height, less floor area, more restrictive uses, and larger setbacks.
A developer can exceed the outright potential by negotiating with the Planning Department over the limitations on categories that have been identified in the various planning controls at the discretion of the Director of Planning.{{Cite web |url=https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/broadway-planning-consideration-of-rezoning-applications.pdf |title=Broadway Plan |last=City of Vancouver |date=June 19, 2018}}{{Cite web |url=https://cd1-bylaws.vancouver.ca/CD-1(435).pdf |title=CD-1 Bylaw |last=City of Vancouver |date=November 14, 2017}} As noted above, this negotiating process gives the Planning Department significant leverage to negotiate design concessions or public benefits from developers; however, it does have numerous downsides, including:
- Uncertainty about development potential and costs: The absence of up-front quantifiable values for height, floor area, use and setbacks in discretionary planning make it difficult for planners, developers, architects, residents or any others to predict or forecast accurately what can be built on any site in the city or what the development costs will be;{{Cite web |url=http://www.bcchamber.org/policies/removing-uncertainty-community-amenity-contributions |title=REMOVING UNCERTAINTY FROM COMMUNITY AMENITY CONTRIBUTIONS |last=BC Chamber of Commerce |date=2014}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/cur/MRPAward/Mattinson,Adam_Dealing_With_Density_MRP.pdf |title=DEALING WITH DENSITY: AN EVALUATION OF DENSITY BENEFIT INCENTIVES IN THE METRO VANCOUVER REGION |last=Adam |first=Mattinson |date=April 2015}}
- Lengthy planning approval: Arriving at a negotiated agreement for the development of a site – usually performed as a custom rezoning arrangement called "spot rezoning", especially for a large site – produces a significant amount of work for the developer, designer and planner; the excessive workload borne by the Planning Department on numerous such approvals at any given time causes delays in the issuing of permits for development. The City of Vancouver, as a result, has the longest wait times for permit approvals in the region.{{Cite web |url=https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/vancouver-development-building-permit-office-lineup |title=This is how architects and builders wait in line at Vancouver's building permit office |last=Daily Hive |date=September 27, 2018}}{{Cite web |url=https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/city-to-test-ways-to-speed-up-approval-of-development-permits |title=Vancouver to test ways to speed up approval of development permits |last=Vancouver Sun |date=March 8, 2017}}{{Cite web |url=https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/city-of-vancouver-looks-to-reduce-building-permit-waits-as-citizens-suffer |title=City of Vancouver looks to reduce building permit waits as citizens suffer |last=Vancouver Sun |date=December 2, 2016}}
- Opacity of negotiation: The negotiations between planners and developers involve large amounts of money and affect the public, but lack transparency despite being negotiated by public servants on behalf of citizens;{{Cite web |url=http://www.newyaletown.ca/2015/01/supreme-court-vancouver-development-process-unfair/ |title=Supreme Court: Vancouver Development Process Unfair, Illegal |last=Community Association of New Yaletown |date=January 2015}}{{Cite book |title=The Vancouver Achievement: Urban Planning and Design |last=Punter |first=John |publisher=UBC Press |year=2003 |isbn=0774809728 |location=Vancouver |pages=295}}
- Lack of public engagement: Because the discretionary negotiation takes place between the developer and the Planning Department, the public is not involved in the planning process until after those two parties have already agreed most of the major aspects of the development. This frequently results in significant public backlash at the required public open houses, with citizens believing that they were not adequately consulted in advance. Examples include neighbourhood plans such as those for Norquay,{{Cite web |url=https://thetyee.ca/News/2007/09/21/EcoDensity/?PageSpeed=noscript |title=Birth of EcoDensity Backlash |last=Kimmett |first=Colleen |date=September 21, 2007 |website=The Tyee}} Marpole,{{Cite web |url=https://www.straight.com/news/413426/planning-process-vancouvers-marpole-district-sparks-community-backlash |title=Planning process for Vancouver's Marpole district sparks community backlash |last=Pablo |first=Carlito |date=August 21, 2013 |website=The Georgia Straight}} Mount Pleasant,{{Cite web |url=https://www.vancourier.com/news/residents-ramp-up-suit-against-city-of-vancouver-1.1321463 |title=Residents RAMP up suit against City of Vancouver |last=O'Connor |first=Naoibh |date=August 20, 2014 |website=Vancouver Courier}} and northeast False Creek,{{Cite web |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-approves-plan-to-revitalize-northeast-false-creek-1.4533868 |title=Vancouver approves plan to revitalize northeast False Creek |last=Zeidler |first=Maryse |date=February 13, 2018 |website=CBC News}} as well as for individual projects such as the tower at Kingsway and East Broadway{{Cite web |url=https://www.straight.com/news/rize-alliance-proposal-mount-pleasant-receives-thumbs-vancouver-city-staff |title=Rize Alliance proposal in Mount Pleasant receives a thumbs up from Vancouver city staff |last=Smith |first=Charlie |date=February 28, 2012 |website=The Georgia Straight}} or the tower at 1725 Pendrell,{{Cite web |url=https://www.straight.com/news/638771/west-end-residents-lose-court-challenge-aimed-block-21-story-tower |title=West End residents lose court challenge that aimed to block 21-story tower |last=Lupick |first=Travis |date=February 16, 2016 |website=The Georgia Straight}} among others;
- Potential for corruption: The amount of money involved in real estate development, together with the discretionary power of planning officials and lack of transparency in negotiations, combines to create a system of development approval that can be highly prone to corruption and likely to involve dark or laundered money.{{Cite web |url=https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2014/07/14/Vancouver-Stop-Zoning/ |title=Vancouver's 'Spot Zoning' Is Corrupting Its Soul |last=Condon |first=Patrick |date=July 14, 2014 |website=The Tyee}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.vancourier.com/real-estate/many-metro-vancouverites-describe-real-estate-sector-as-corrupt-poll-1.23537938 |title=Many Metro Vancouverites describe real estate sector as corrupt: poll |last=Connolly |first=Joannah |date=December 14, 2018 |website=Vancouver Courier}}{{Cite web |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-real-estate-market-extremely-corrupt-report-1.4944726 |title=37% of Metro Vancouverites think real estate market is 'extremely corrupt': report |last=CBC News |date=December 13, 2018}}{{Cite web |url=https://vancouversun.com/pmn/business-pmn/why-criminals-look-to-canada-to-launder-their-money-through-real-estate/wcm/a92ff0e2-50d7-4336-90fc-d859a8ee0c92 |title=Why criminals look to Canada to launder their money through real estate |last=Canadian Press |date=May 13, 2019 |website=Vancouver Sun}}
See also
References
{{Reflist}}
External links
- [https://web.archive.org/web/20121224040331/http://public.metrovancouver.org/planning/development/strategy/RGSDocs/RGSAdoptedbyGVRDBoardJuly292011.pdf Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy ]
- [http://www.translink.ca/~/media/documents/plans_and_projects/regional_transportation_strategy/rts_strategic_framework_07_31_2013.ashx Translink Regional Transportation Strategy Strategic Framework]
- Punter, John. The Vancouver Achievement:Urban Planning and Design. N.p.: n.p., 2004. Print.
{{City Verbs}}