Vili Kovačič

Vili Kovačič was active in student movements in the 1960s. In 1963 he co-organized the student movement for students' social equality at the University of Ljubljana, which in 1964, together with Perspektive magazine and Jože Pučnik led to a broader student movement.{{Cite web|title=Vili Kovačič|url=https://drzavljank.si/|access-date=2022-01-23|website=drzavljank.si|language=en}} Communist authorities abolished Perspektive magazine.{{Cite web|last=Kos|first=Janko|title=Perspektive |url=http://enciklopedija-osamosvojitve.si/clanek/perspektive/|access-date=2022-01-23|website=Perspektive - E-enciklopedija slovenske osamosvojitve, državnosti in ustavnosti|language=sl}}

In 2012, Kovačič founded an anti-corruption non-governmental organization called We Taxpayers Never Give Up (Davkoplačevalci se ne damo). One of its first projects was an attempt to block the Teš 6, one of the largest energy infrastructure projects in the country. Kovačič claimed that it would be financially flawed and it would mainly serve corruption purposes. Kovačič collected enough signatures to trigger a national referendum on the project, but the Constitutional Court blocked the referendum claiming that some signatures were ineligible or the names were not written exactly as they appeared in the official government's databases (Constitutional Court of Slovenia number U-I-268/12).{{cite web|url=https://www.sta.si/1822875/ustavno-sodisce-zavrnilo-pobudo-glede-referenduma-o-porostvu-za-tes-6|title=STA: Ustavno sodišče zavrnilo pobudo glede referenduma o poroštvu za Teš 6|website=}}{{cite web|url=http://odlocitve.us-rs.si/sl/odlocitev/US29892|title=Sklep Ustavnega sodišča U-I-268/12|website=}} Most political parties and media disregarded his claims that Teš 6 would serve corruption purposes. Several years later, police found 3.3 million Euros of cash in the Teš 6 director Uroš Rotnik's safe, which led to a discovery of a large corruption scheme and Rotnik's conviction in 2019 and 2020.{{Cite web |title=Rotnik pogojno obsojen na deset mesecev zapora |url=https://www.delo.si/novice/crna-kronika/rotnik-pogojno-obsojen-na-deset-mesecev-zapora/ |access-date=2022-04-16 |website=www.delo.si |language=sl-si}}{{Cite web |title=Rotnik obsojen krive ovadbe, pritožba je že napovedana |url=https://www.delo.si/novice/crna-kronika/rotnik-obsojen-krive-ovadbe-pritozba-je-ze-napovedana/ |access-date=2022-04-16 |website=www.delo.si |language=sl-si}}{{Cite web |title=Uroš Rotnik odrešen dveh postopkov, soobtoženi poslovnež Hrkač obsojen |url=https://www.rtvslo.si/crna-kronika/uros-rotnik-odresen-dveh-postopkov/586819 |website=RTVSLO}}

His other projects were the removal of the statue of the communist leader Boris Kidrič from the Council of Europe Park in Ljubljana, and a call for electoral system change in 2014. He was active in protests at the Supreme Court of Slovenia in 2014, in collecting signatures on the Family Code referendum, and at the murder trial of dr. Milko Novic, who was accused of killing dr. Jamnik, the director of the Chemical Institute of Ljubljana, where the daughter of Boris Kidric is employed.

In 2017, Kovačič collected 4500 signatures and triggered a referendum procedure on a railway project between Divača and Koper, called "Drugi tir".{{cite web|url=http://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/bo-podpisov-za-referendum-o-2-tiru-dovolj-vlada-gre-s-projektom-naprej/422391|title=Bo podpisov za referendum o 2. tiru dovolj? Vlada gre s projektom naprej.|website=}} and in the second stage of the procedure he collected over 48,000 notarised signatures, which resulted in a referendum.{{cite web|url=https://www.sta.si/2403325/kovacic-v-dz-vlozil-vec-kot-48-000-podpisov-za-razpis-referenduma-o-zakonu-o-drugem-tiru|title=Kovačič v DZ vložil več kot 48.000 podpisov za razpis referenduma o zakonu o drugem tiru|date=June 27, 2017|website=|publisher=STA}} The National Assembly called a referendum on 24 September 2017, and Kovačič challenged the choice of the date at the Constitutional Court, arguing that for financial reasons and for the facilitation of voting the referendum should be held together with presidential elections, which were scheduled in October 2017. The Constitutional Court rejected his appeal by seven votes to two.{{cite web|url=http://odlocitve.us-rs.si/sl/odlocitev/US31165|title=Sklep U-I-108/17 z dne 21. 7. 2017|date=July 21, 2017|website=|publisher=Ustavno sodišče RS}}

In August 2017 he appealed to the Constitutional Court claiming that the Government of Slovenia violates Council of Europe rules on referendum financing established by the Code of Good Practices in Referendum Matters. He argued that the government should not be allowed to spend state budget funds only for the "yes" vote and not for the "no" vote.{{cite web|url=http://www.slovenskenovice.si/novice/slovenija/neenaki-cerarjevi-sebi-dali-97-tisocakov-tistim-ki-menijo-drugace-ne-dajo|title=Neenaki: Cerarjevi sebi dali 97 tisocakov, tistim ki menijo drugace ne dajo|date=August 8, 2017|website=|publisher=Slovenske novice}} The Constitutional Court ruled that Kovačič should first challenge the referendum results at the Supreme Court and then return to the Constitutional Court if unsuccessful.{{cite web|title=Odločitve US|url=http://odlocitve.us-rs.si/sl/odlocitev/US31195?q=u-i-110/17|website=odlocitve.us-rs.si|language=sl|accessdate=2017-12-14}}

In the referendum held in September 2017, 53.5 percent of the voters backed the railway construction. Kovačič challenged the referendum results at the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court paused the proceedings and sent the case to the Constitutional Court.{{cite web|url=http://www.sodisce.si/vsrs/objave/2017121214244279/|title=Vrhovno sodišče RS. VSRS zahtevalo ustavno presojo zaradi varstva pravice do glasovanja na referendumu.|date=December 12, 2017|accessdate=2017-12-14|website=www.sodisce.si|language=sl}}{{cite web|url=https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/vrhovno-sodisce-v-ustavno-presojo-poslalo-zakon-o-referendumu/440346|title=Vrhovno sodišče v ustavno presojo poslalo zakon o referendumu|newspaper=Prvi interaktivni multimedijski portal, MMC RTV Slovenija|accessdate=2017-12-14}} In January 2018 the Constitutional Court annulled some parts of the referendum legislation and ordered the Supreme Court to assess the severity of the referendum rules' violations, and if these violations could affect the referendum outcome, to annul the referendum results.{{cite web|url=http://www.us-rs.si/media/u-i-191-17.pdf|title=Odločba Ustavnega sodišča št. U-I-191/17|date=January 25, 2018|website=|publisher=Ustavno sodišče RS}} Professor Jurij Toplak wrote appeals to the Constitutional Court and to the Supreme Court for Kovačič.

On 14 March 2018, the Supreme Court held its first public hearing since the independence of Slovenia, and Kovačič questioned prime minister Miro Cerar as a witness. On the same day, the Supreme Court annulled the referendum results and a few hours later, the prime minister Cerar resigned.{{Cite news|last=Surk|first=Barbara|date=2018-03-15|title=Slovenian Leader Quits After Court Blocks Key Rail Project|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/world/europe/slovenia-prime-minister-miro-cerar-resigns.html|access-date=2022-01-23|issn=0362-4331}}

In 2018, Kovačič challenged local elections results in Ljubljana due to alleged campaign finance and electoral corruption violations by mayor Zoran Janković. He requested a public hearing at the Administrative Court, but the court rejected his appeal without holding a hearing. Kovačič appealed to the Constitutional Court and succeeded. In June 2019, the court ruled that the Administrative Court violated Kovačič's rights by not holding a hearing. It ordered that within 30 days, the Administrative Court had to hold a public hearing and if violations are found, the composition of the city council should be changed or new elections should be held.{{cite web|title=Odločba Ustavnega sodišča št. Up-135/19|url=http://odlocitve.us-rs.si/sl/odlocitev/US31952|website=odlocitve.us-rs.si|accessdate=2019-07-06|publisher=Ustavno sodišče RS}}

As of April 2022, the Administrative Court still had not held a public hearing and Kovačič informed international organisations about alleged violations of international electoral norms.{{cite web|title=Protest Grecu, Ovse, Beneški komisiji, ker sodišča ne sodijo v volilnih sporih - Spletni časopis|url=https://spletnicasopis.eu/2019/10/12/protest-grecu-ovse-beneski-komisiji-in-se-ker-sodisca-ne-sodijo-v-volilnih-sporih/?print=print|website=spletnicasopis.eu|accessdate=2019-10-12|publisher=Spletni časopis|last=Jančič|first=Peter}} On October 11, 2019, Kovačič informed OSCE, ODIHR, the Council of Europe, the Venice Commission, and the Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) about the judicial delay and alleged judicial misconduct, and asked them to intervene or assist.{{Cite web|url=https://english.sta.si/2687051/pensioner-complains-to-european-institutions-about-lengthy-electoral-disputes|title=STA: Pensioner complains to European institutions about lengthy electoral disputes|website=english.sta.si|access-date=2019-10-14}} Between 2019 and 2022, he numerous times publicly called the court to hold the hearing.{{Cite web|date=2021-09-16|title=Vili Kovačič med drugimi nadaljuje sodno bitko za poštene lokalne volitve v Ljubljani {{!}} Politikis|url=http://www.politikis.si/2021/09/vili-kovacic-med-drugimi-nadaljuje-sodno-bitko-za-postene-lokalne-volitve-v-ljubljani/|access-date=2022-01-23|language=sl-SI}}{{Cite web|date=2021-06-17|title=Nepravilnosti na zadnjih lokalnih volitvah v Ljubljani dobivajo epilog! Bo izid razveljavljen? {{!}} Nova24TV|url=https://nova24tv.si/slovenija/politika/ali-bo-kovacicu-uspelo-razveljaviti-izid-lokalnih-volitev-v-ljubljani/|access-date=2022-01-23|language=sl-SI}} In late 2021, the court announced that it would hold a hearing but only eight people could attend it in person, and ten online. Kovačič protested that the online stream should be opened for more audience, and the court cancelled the hearing.{{Cite web|title=Urgentno javno pismo predsedniku Vrhovnega sodišča Damijanu Florjančiču|url=https://www.portalplus.si/4506/poziv-damjanu-florjancicu/|access-date=2022-01-23|website=www.portalplus.si}}

During Milko Novič's highly publicised Jamnik murder trial, in 2017, Kovačič publicly called judge Špela Koleta a "sow". He later asserted that this was not meant as a personal insult, but as a reference to George Orwell's Animal Farm, in which pigs represent authoritarian rulers abusing their power.{{Cite web|title=Pritožba zaradi izrečene besede "Prasica" sodnici Špeli Koleta, ko je nepravično obdolžila Milka Noviča na 25 let zapora!|url=https://dosjemilkonovic.si/post/477546/pritozba-zaradi-izrecene-besede-prasica-sodnici-speli-koleta-ko-je-nepravicno-obdolzila-milka-novica-na-25-let-zapora|access-date=2020-10-17|website=dosjemilkonovic.si|language=en}} Koleta sentenced Novič to 25 years imprisonment, but the Supreme Court overturned the conviction.{{Cite web|title=Fasal 1200 evrov kazni, ker je rekel sodnici, da je prasica. Tisti sodnici, ki je krivično obsodila Milka Noviča!|url=https://pozareport.si/post/473016/fasal-1200-evrov-kazni-ker-je-rekel-sodnici-da-je-prasica-tisti-sodnici-ki-je-krivicno-obsodila-milka-novica|access-date=2020-10-17|website=pozareport.si|language=en}} In two retrials, Novič was found innocent.{{Cite web|title=Milko Novič oproščen. Sodnik: Zadeva očitno seže v vrhove pravosodja.|url=https://www.rtvslo.si/crna-kronika/milko-novic-oproscen-sodnik-zadeva-ocitno-seze-v-vrhove-pravosodja/485646|access-date=2022-01-23|website=RTVSLO.si|language=sl}}{{Cite web|title=Vsak dan prvi - 24ur.com|url=https://www.24ur.com/novice/slovenija/v-zadevi-novic-danes-zakljucne-besede-in-predvidoma-tudi-izrek-sodbe.html|access-date=2022-01-23|website=www.24ur.com}}

Judge Koleta pressed criminal charges. Kovačič was convicted in 2018, and fined 1260 Euros.{{Cite web|title=1260 evrov kazni, ker je sodnici, ki je obsodila Milka Noviča, rekel prasica|url=https://reporter.si/clanek/slovenija/1260-evrov-kazni-ker-je-sodnici-ki-je-obsodila-milka-novica-rekel-prasica-701719?fb_comment_id=2315807338441654_2315880421767679|access-date=2020-10-17|website=Revija Reporter}} Kovačič refused to pay the fine himself, and made a public appeal for donations.{{Cite web |title=PROŠNJA ZA DONACIJO pri zadevi PRASICA |url=https://drzavljank.si/post/510132/prosnja-za-donacijo-pri-zadevi-prasica |access-date=2020-10-17 |website=drzavljank.si |language=en}} Kovačič also appealed, asserting his freedom of expression. In December 2021, the Supreme Court vacated the fine and instead issued Kovačič a warning.{{Cite web|title=To je sklep "sodnica prasica": Zaradi slabih 1300 evrov Viliju Kovačiču rubijo pokojnino, hišo in parcele|url=https://pozareport.si/post/563568/kovacic-alias-drzavljan-k-je-pred-kratkim-javno-predlagal-tudi-uvedbo-posebnega-evropskega-pravosodnega-izpita-ki-pa-bi-moral-biti-po-njegovem-za-slovenijo-se-posebno-strog-|access-date=2020-10-17|website=pozareport.si|language=en}}{{Cite web|date=2020-06-05|title=Kaj se dogaja v zadevi »prasica«?|url=https://demokracija.si/fokus/kaj-se-dogaja-v-zadevi-prasica/|access-date=2022-01-23|website=Demokracija|language=sl-SI}}{{Cite web |title=Vrhovno sodišče odpravilo denarno kazen za izjavo o sodnici "prasici" |url=https://siol.net/novice/slovenija/vrhovno-sodisce-odpravilo-denarno-kazen-za-izjavo-o-sodnici-prasici-577351 |website=Siol}}

After the European Court of Human Rights in December 2021 ruled that Romania's ban on the Communist Party had been in line with the European Convention of Human Rights and "necessary for the democratic society",{{Cite web|date=2021-12-21|title=European Court Backs Romania's Refusal to Register Communist Party|url=https://balkaninsight.com/2021/12/21/european-court-backs-romanias-refusal-to-register-communist-party/|access-date=2022-01-23|website=Balkan Insight|language=en-US}} in January 2022, Kovačič asked the Constitutional Court of Slovenia to ban two parliamentary parties by applying the European Court's standards, and standards set by the 1952 German Constitutional Court's prohibition of the German communist party.{{Cite web|title=Na US pobuda za prepoved SD in Levice po sodbi ESČP|url=https://siol.net/novice/slovenija/na-us-pobuda-za-prepoved-sd-in-levice-po-sodbi-escp-569900|access-date=2022-01-23|website=siol.net|language=sl}}{{Cite web|title=Pobuda za prepoved stranke tudi SD in Levici|url=https://www.delo.si/novice/slovenija/pobuda-za-prepoved-stranke-tudi-sd-in-levici/|access-date=2022-01-23|website=www.delo.si|language=sl-si}} Kovačič claimed that SD, a party which is the legal successor of the former Communist Party, and the party Left, were unconstitutional. In March 2022, the Constitutional Court rejected Kovačič's petition, saying it had no grounds.{{Cite web |title=Ustavno sodišče je zavrnilo pobudo za oceno protiustavnosti Levice in SD-ja |url=https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/ustavno-sodisce-je-zavrnilo-pobudo-za-oceno-protiustavnosti-levice-in-sd-ja/616814 |access-date=2022-03-24 |website=RTVSLO.si |language=sl}}

Kovačič informs the public about his activities in his online blog [http://www.drzavljank.si drzavljank.si].{{cite web|last=Kovačič|first=Vili|title=Blog Vili Kovačič|url=http://www.publishwall.si/vili.kovacic|website=|publisher=Publishwall}} He or the We Taxpayers Never Give up association regularly inform international organisations about corruption issues in Slovenia. According to his wife, they constantly receive threats and insults by phone and mail.{{Cite web|title=Jožefa Kovačič o grožnjah: Seveda naju je ob vsem tem strah|url=https://reporter.si/clanek/slovenija/jozefa-kovacic-o-groznjah-naslovljenih-na-moza-vilija-kovacicaseveda-naju-je-ob-vsem-tem-strah-632261?fb_comment_id=702660413191168_702846723172537|access-date=2022-01-23|website=Revija Reporter}}

{{notelist}}

{{Reflist}}

• Vili Kovačič blog http://www.drzavljank.si and http://www.publishwall.si/vili.kovacic
• Interview with Vili Kovačič in Mladina: "Je legitimnost nad legalnostjo?" http://www.mladina.si/114605/vili-kovacic-je-legitimnost-nad-legalnostjo/
• Interview with Vili Kovačič in Demokracija: "Kučan je tisti, ki ogroža demokracijo" http://demokracija.si/fokus/intervju-z-vilijem-kovacicem-kucan-je-tisti-ki-ogroza-demokracijo

{{DEFAULTSORT:Kovacic, Vili}}

Category:1941 births

Category:Living people

Category:Slovenian activists