WP:Bots/Noticeboard#InternetArchiveBot notices about nothing but archive-url additions

I'm unsure if this is the right place to post such a request, but could a crat flag this bot please. The task it will be carrying out, the BRFA, and other information can be found here – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 13:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

:There is no need to request the bot flag separately. Once a bot is approved, it is listed under Approved BRFAs at Crat tasks, and passing crats grant the flag if the bot needs to be flagged. – DreamRimmer ◆ 16:01, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

::Ok, thanks for letting me know. I'm new to this process, so that's why I asked. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 16:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Np :) – DreamRimmer ◆ 16:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Looks like this might have been missed. @Primefac, if you have a moment, could you please grant the bot flag here? – DreamRimmer ■ 12:53, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

::::{{done}}, for the record, sorry for the delay (I'm still not getting notifications when the /Approved list is updated, so I sometimes miss the "needs flag" notice). Primefac (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{rfplinks|AvicBot}}

Bot and operator both inactive for more than two years. Operator will be notified soon. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

:Sounds good, keep us posted. Primefac (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

:: Notified the operator [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Avicennasis&diff=1290126807&oldid=1286440571 here] around the time I posted this. It's now been more than a week, so it's time for a crat to remove the flag. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{done}} — xaosflux ^Talk 18:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

I've noticed that a lot of the Wikipedia:BRFA requests have gone stale over the past few months. I'd like to help by creating a bot that adds BAG templates if nobody has responded to a request for a certain amount of time. I know that @AnomieBOT moves requests that have actually expired, and I don't intend to replace that functionality unless needed. The bot would add each template based on the current status of the request, as well as the last response. For example, if the bot is in the trial phase, and the latest message is from the requester and contains the phrase "trial complete" without the proper template, the bot would respond with the template. Or if a bot was in the request phase and had been stale for a couple of months, the bot would add the either Operator or BAG assistance needed template, depending on if the last respondent was a BAG member or not. There would likely be a template you could add to a request to prevent this, or set custom timing before the bot activates, similar to the Do not archive [until] template. The bot could also automatically deactivate templates if the proper user or user group responds. Does anyone think these tasks would be helpful? I'm only asking here because it directly impacts the BRFA process as well as the BAG, and I need toolforge access in order to implement it. JarJarInks_{٩(◕_◕)۶}^{Tones essay} 12:52, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

:No comment on most of that, but the Toolforge piece is independent of the BRFA process and you can request that anytime by following the process at wikitech:Help:Toolforge/Quickstart. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

: I can't say this seems particularly helpful to me. If humans want attention, they can add the templates. A bot doing it renders them meaningless. Anomie⚔ 00:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

: Sounds like more hassle than it's worth. As said above, if someone needs my attention, I can be pinged; if I start getting bot-generated pings for BRFA, I will start ignoring them. That being said, if someone wants to clerk the "in trial" requests and add the appropriate {{t|BotTrialComplete}} if it's not added, be my guest, but from my recollection it's fairly rare for that to happen and thus probably doesn't need a bot. Primefac (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you all for your feedback. I'll try to find some more important issues to work on. JarJarInks_{٩(◕_◕)۶}^{Tones essay} 17:01, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

::WP:BOTREQ might have some good ideas. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

[https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/1kwauyb/bot_never_approved/ Someone on Reddit] seems to be having trouble getting this interesting bot correctly listed for approval. Can anyone help? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 05:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:Perhaps it was overlooked because it was never added to the main WP:BRFA page. I think the instructions

:{{tqb|Your request must now be added to the correct section of the main approvals page: Click here and add {{BRFA}} to the top of the list, directly below the comment line.{{pb}} For a first request: use {{BRFA|bot name||Open}}{{pb}} For an additional task request: use {{BRFA|bot name|task number|Open}}}}

:might have been skipped by mistake. cc {{u|AidenD}}. –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:54, 27 May 2025 (UTC)