WT:Page mover#Page movers implementing a primary topic

Want to see how many moves I've done. FOARP (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

:{{ping|FOARP}} If what you're trying to find is your page move log, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=move&user=FOARP&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=&wpFormIdentifier=logeventslist this] is it. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

::Thanks! That's exactly what I was looking for. FOARP (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation § Page Mover Moving a Sandbox to Draft Space. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Hey folks - a page mover suggested a wish to "perform" a round robin page move with one action, instead of two.

To help us better understand the potential impact of this wish, could you comment on the talk page re: how often folks create round robin moves? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist/Wishes/Page_swap JWheeler-WMF (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § Grant move-subpages to template editor user group. —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Immediately below the table, there's nothing saying that criterion #9 must be explained; I anticipated such a warning and was surprised to find it elsewhere in the section. What if we removed the final sentence of this section, and then added (immediately below the table) a stronger warning: something like "If you use the final criterion, you must explain which speedy deletion criterion it meets, and how"? We don't want someone omitting such an explanation merely because he doesn't notice the bit at the end of the section.

Lest anyone wonder — this doesn't arise from a dispute. I had no idea that we had codified any criteria of this sort until just now, when someone suggested move-without-redirect in an RFD and said "it would meet this criterion". Nyttend (talk) 03:41, 19 May 2025 (UTC)