WT:WikiProject Psychology

This stub has been unreferenced and unimproved for 15 years. I think it's been mis-tagged as well. Can somebody please think of the children, and add a few reliable sources? Thanks. Bearian (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

I’ve drafted a sandbox article for The Principle of Collaboration and Cooperation (TPOCo) (User:Darwipli/sandbox - Wikipedia). TPOCo synthesizes decades of research into an interdisciplinary model showing how cooperation—as an energy‑sharing, cyclical process—emerges from early childhood through complex societies. It highlights uniquely human behaviours (e.g., fair sharing after collaboration) grounded in developmental psychology and comparative research (Tomasello et al. 2011).

• Links cognitive and social developmental findings (e.g., sharing in preschoolers)
• Integrates cross‑species comparisons to clarify what makes human cooperation unique
• Provides a systems perspective useful for social cognition and developmental theory

I welcome feedback on psychological framing, source quality, and integration with existing articles (e.g., cooperation, social cognition). Please review the draft at User:Darwipli/sandbox - Wikipedia and share comments below. — Darwipli (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2025 (UTC) Darwipli (talk) 04:14, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

I’ve recently started Draft:False humility on the English Wikipedia. However, due to limitations in my English skills and access to reliable sources in this language, I am unable to fully expand and improve it.

Please help expand and prepare this article for publication in the "article namespace". Arbabi second (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

I'm looking to add to the Infant Cognitive Development article, and have started drafting sections to add. Can someone look over my current drafts to make sure I'm writing correctly before publishing? Sylveon2603 (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

The Problematic social media use article is exceptionally poor, and has been for some time, largely because it has been the subject of repeated student editing projects that have resulted in people adding material just for the sake of writing. The writing style reflects this, with a lot of school-essay style padding.

The article desperately needs tightening up, refactoring and copyediting; I think it could easily be reduced to half the length without losing anything of value.

Would anyone here be willing to take a look at it? — The Anome (talk) 08:55, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Advanced Personalized Learning#Requested move 6 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Yeshivish613 (talk) 04:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Counseling psychology#Requested move 18 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 16:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello!

I would like to kindly request feedback on a newly created draft article:

Draft:Samuel Zeyd

It is a biography of an Azerbaijani psychologist, coach, and author of a certified psychocorrectional method. The draft includes reliable sources, a neutral tone, and categorization within the scope of psychology.

Any guidance, suggestions, or editorial support from WikiProject Psychology would be deeply appreciated.

Thank you in advance! Samuel Zeyd (talk) 10:04, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

:Read the following:

:Wikipedia:Autobiography

:Wikipedia:Notability

:Wikipedia:Conflict of interest

:WP:PROMOTION

:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view

:Wikipedia:Reliable sources

:This also appears to be relevant:

:Wikipedia:Username policy

:There is absolutely no way your draft will be accepted. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion of random psychologists (or anyone else). AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. There is $500 of prizes going into improving Sciences, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, Medicine and Business-related articles and we hope to see a lot of science-related articles destubbed and older stale articles improved in particular. If you are interested in winning some vouchers to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for psychology, sign up if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Recently, a user added a short description to the article on Borderline personality disorder. As a result of me stating the opinion that the description was inadequate, I requested suggestions at the article's Talk page. A suggestion was proposed, namely "Personality disorder characterized by unstable emotions, relationships, and self-image", which was supported by others too. We decided to also request comments from others over here. Thanks in advance for thoughts on the matter! BlockArranger (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Please see the discussion at WT:WikiProject Sociology ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 06:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

There are some pretty important conversations going on over at Talk:Personality disorder including Talk:Personality disorder#Significant lack of citations regarding the lack of citations throughout the article Talk:Personality disorder#Profound lack of information on PD assessment regarding where we seem to be lacking some information, and Talk:Personality disorder#Managment section which is my attempt at trying to make some improvements to the management section. Any input would be appreciated. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 16:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

There is a new page that was recently created that may interest this wikiproject, Diagnostic overshadowing in autism. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 20:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Ovulatory shift hypothesis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

I just stumbled upon the article on Risk-seeking, which is in a seriously bad state. The psychology stuff is in its own section beneath the rest, and is of dubious quality to say the least. I believe that we should try to improve it, as traits and behaviors are obviously important. Perhaps a split of the article would be in order...? I think we should first work on making the content adequate anyway, so that we do not dump a half-baked article onto Wikipedia. BlockArranger (talk) 21:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks for your work on this. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:57, 18 June 2025 (UTC)