Weaver v. Palmer Bros. Co.
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox SCOTUS case
|Litigants=Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Company
|ArgueDate=December 11
|ArgueYear=1925
|DecideDate=March 8
|DecideYear=1926
|FullName=Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Company
|USVol=270
|USPage=402
|ParallelCitations=46 S. Ct. 320; 70 L. Ed. 654; 1926 U.S. LEXIS 420
|Prior=
|Subsequent=
|Holding=
|SCOTUS=
|Majority=Butler
|JoinMajority=Taft, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Sutherland, Sanford
|Dissent=Holmes
|JoinDissent=Brandeis, Stone
|LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. XIV
}}
Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Company, 270 U.S. 402 (1926), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down a public health and safety regulation as a violation of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.{{ussc|name=Weaver v. Palmer Bros. Co.|270|402|1926}}.Varat, J.D. et al. Constitutional Law Cases and Materials, Concise Thirteenth Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2009, p. 368
Background
A statute banned the use of cut up fabrics in the manufacturing of bedding based on concerns over public health. The statute did allow for the use of other second hand fabrics after sterilization.
Opinion of the Court
Because the banned cut up fabrics could be rendered safe by the same process of sterilization, the Court held the statute to be an arbitrary infringement on business that violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.Varat, p. 368
References
{{reflist}}
External links
- {{caselaw source
| case = Weaver v. Palmer Bros. Co., {{ussc|270|402|1926|el=no}}
| courtlistener =
| justia =https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/270/402/
| loc =http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep270/usrep270402/usrep270402.pdf
}}
Category:United States Supreme Court cases
Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court