Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2011

• User:Risker banned {{user|DMSBel}} for one year for continuing the battlefield editing and commentary with respect to another editor sanctioned in this case. Risker (talk) 03:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
• User:Risker banned {{user|Captain Occam}} for one year for continued battlefield editing and commentary, which began during the course of voting on the proposed decision of this case (in which he was not a party) with respect to another editor sanctioned in this case. After three months, Captain Occam's ban may be modified after three months to permit him to contribute to content-related areas only; please see the block notice on his user talk page.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACaptain_Occam&action=historysubmit&diff=465574487&oldid=465236561] Risker (talk) 03:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Esoglou}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Esoglou&diff=468016665&oldid=467807829 warned] per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=468016214&oldid=468014159 this AE Report]. --WGFinley (talk) 03:00, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Esoglou}} is banned for three months from the topic of abortion, broadly construed, on all pages of Wikipedia for continued battleground behavior and misuse of sources after prior warning listed above. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Esoglou&diff=471883654&oldid=471828927 User notified]. --WGFinley (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

• {{user|ASALA7.08.1982}} is blocked for one year as arbitration enforcement (as part of an indefinite block to whose remaining duration normal rules apply), as well as indefinitely topic-banned from Armenia per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WP:AE&oldid=408640718#ASALA7.08.1982 this AE thread].  Sandstein  19:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Xebulon}} is topic-banned for three months from Armenia and Azerbaijan, including notably any conflicts with other countries or peoples, as defined at WP:TBAN, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=410146245#Xebulon this AE thread].  Sandstein  10:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

:*Blocked for a week and topic ban reset to begin anew for violation of the topic ban, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xebulon&oldid=413176739#February_2011 this talk page message].  Sandstein  21:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

• {{la|Caucasian Albania}}

:*Because of continued nationalistic edit-warring and associated disruption, no editor may make more than one revert per week on this article, and all editors with Armenia/Azerbaijan-related sanctions are banned from editing this article and its talk page. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Caucasian_Albania&oldid=413180491#Discretionary_sanctions talk page notice], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Editnotices/Page/Caucasian_Albania edit notice].  Sandstein  21:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

::* Above sanction replaced with 1RR per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=495950645&oldid=495857268 this] discussion. Gatoclass (talk) 04:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:*Topic ban extended to indefinite duration for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xebulon&oldid=422981025#Topic_ban_extended ban evasion via sockpuppet].  Sandstein  06:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

:*Blocked 1 month for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Xebulon&diff=430542759&oldid=429984357 confirmed sockpuppetry]. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Tuscumbia}} is topic-banned for six months from Armenia and Azerbaijan, including notably any conflicts with other countries or peoples, as defined at WP:TBAN, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=410146245#Xebulon this AE thread].  Sandstein  10:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Twilight Chill}}, previously editing as Brandmeister, is topic-banned for one year from Armenia and Azerbaijan, as defined at WP:TBAN, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=411870354#Result_concerning_Twilight_Chill this AE thread].  Sandstein  22:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

:*Blocked for a week for violating the topic ban, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WP:AE&oldid=413271709#Result_concerning_Vandorenfm AE thread].  Sandstein  09:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Vandorenfm}} blocked for 72 hours for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=411870354#Result_concerning_Twilight_Chill personal attacks and inflammatory conduct].  Sandstein  22:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|MarshallBagramyan}} is indefinitely restricted as follows: He may not make derogatory statements about sources or their authors on the sole basis of their nationality, place of birth or publication, ethnic group, religion or similar general characteristic that is unrelated to their reliability in terms of Wikipedia policy, as per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=411875196#MarshallBagramyan this AE thread].  Sandstein  23:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Vandorenfm}} is topic-banned for one month from Armenia and Azerbaijan, as defined at WP:TBAN, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=414902472&oldid=414902284 this AE thread]. EdJohnston (talk) 05:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Alpha Beta Gaga}} is topic-banned, as defined at WP:TBAN, for six months from Armenia and Armenians. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&oldid=415383349#Alpha_Beta_Gaga discussion].  Sandstein  21:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Aram-van}} - blocked 24 hours for violation of 1RR/week at Baklava, among others. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Aram-van}} - blocked 48 hours for violation of 1RR/week at Kingdom of Armenia (antiquity). Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Aram-van}} - blocked indefinitely for relentless sanctions violation, and exhibiting at quack that while not full-proof, gave off a strong suspicions. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Verman1}} topic-banned for 6 months, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=423197001#Verman1 AE thread]. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Monte Melkonian}} blocked 1 week for continued disruption after explicit warning about this decision. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Aryamahasattva}} blocked one week for breaking 1RR restriction on Urartian language, an article related to Armenia and Azerbaijan. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Dighapet}} is limited to 1RR per day on all articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dighapet&diff=prev&oldid=426650046 this notice]. The restriction expires 29 July 2011. This action is the result of an edit warring case [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=prev&oldid=426649734 closed here]. Kuru (talk) 00:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Atabəy}} is banned from Iranian topics including the Safavids for three months and is under an indefinite restriction to 1RR/week per the result of a thread at WP:AE. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Atabəy&diff=prev&oldid=427696410 Notified]. EdJohnston (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Dighapet}} banned from editing all A/A pages for 4 months[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADighapet&action=historysubmit&diff=450711073&oldid=450636208]. AGK [•] 21:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Kevorkmail}} - blocked a week for edit warring at Yerevan. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Atabəy}} topic banned from all edits in article and article talk space concerning the topic of Eastern European or West Asian nationalism, for six months starting October 16 00:00 UTC, but ban will be suspended on good behavior. Details found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=455412538 here].--Tznkai (talk) 06:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Khodabandeh14}} topic banned from all edits in article and article talk space concerning the topic of Eastern European or West Asian nationalism, for six months starting October 16 00:00 UTC, but ban will be suspended on good behavior. Details found [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=455412538 here].--Tznkai (talk) 06:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Kevorkmail}} blocked indefinitely for constant edit warring, battleground mentality, and being on Wikipedia only to push an agenda (i.e., being a giant prick). Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|ArmOvak}} blocked 24 hours for edit warring and not discussing; after warning. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

{{NOINDEX}}

• {{user|Orartu}} blocked for one month, see talk page. Block log message got cut off. This was intended to be the full message: "Disruptive editing and personal attacks/accusations: WP:NPA, WP:BATTLE, WP:EW: Treating Wikipedia as a battleground for ethnic conflicts, making serious accusations against other users with real-life implications, ignoring numerous admin warnings and repeating the same disruptive activities that led to last block." Khoikhoi 01:49, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Vacio}} is restricted indefinitely from evaluation of sources' reliability or neutrality based upon any criterion not listed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and especially based upon the national origin of the source or author. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Peterlewis}} prohibited from reverting without discussing.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APeterlewis&action=historysubmit&diff=447080315] NW (Talk) 03:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

:*Blocked 24 hours for violating that sanction[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Peterlewis&diff=462768457&oldid=456349251]. NW (Talk) 18:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

• The individual behind {{ipuser|98.234.208.200}}: topic-banned from the topic of Ukrainians, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:98.234.208.200&diff=412301074&oldid=410547813]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Tentontunic}} blocked for 1 week for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes&diff=417783427&oldid=417243356 violating] the editing restriction that applies to Mass killings under Communist regimes.  Sandstein  15:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
• Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=419256851#Result_concerning_Jacurek this AE request] concerning edit-warring about alternate names in several articles:

:*{{user|Jacurek}} is indefinitely banned from the topic of Eastern Europe (see WP:TBAN).

::*Blocked for a month for ban evasion via IPs, 19 April 2011, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacurek/Archive#18 April 2011 and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jacurek&oldid=425458918 talk page]. Confirmed after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=425458702#Proposed_community_ban:_Jacurek discussion] at WP:AN, 23 April 2011.  Sandstein  06:40, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

:*{{user|Dr. Dan}} is banned from the topic of Eastern Europe (see WP:TBAN) for three months and indefinitely banned from changing names as described below.

:*{{user|Lokyz}} is banned from the topic of Eastern Europe (see WP:TBAN) for three months and indefinitely banned from changing names as described below.

:*{{user|Volunteer Marek}} is banned from changing names as described below for six months and warned not to express what sounds like nationalist prejudice.

::*The sanction is vacated for the reasons described [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=420448080#Sanction_vacated in this appeal discussion] and replaced with a warning not to continue nationalist edit wars by others and not to engage in a pattern of apparently nationalistically motivated name-changing.  Sandstein  06:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

:*{{user|M.K}} is warned about the possibility of discretionary sanctions.

:A ban from changing names means that the editor is banned from editing articles to change, remove or add names (including translations) in a Eastern European language with respect to a subject that the same article already designates with a name in another Eastern European language. This includes names in other pages that are displayed as part of the article, such as categories, images or templates, and it also forbids moving articles that have a name in a Eastern European language to a name in another language. For the purpose of this ban, "Eastern European language" includes German.  Sandstein  06:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Iaaasi}} is indefinitely restricted to one revert per page per month in the Eastern Europe topic area, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=420668522#User:Iaaasi_reported_by_User:Nmate_.28result:_indef.29 this AN3 report].  Sandstein  15:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Hangakiran}} is, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=421887743#Hangakiran this AE request], indefinitely topic-banned from Janos Boros. The sanction may be lifted after four months as described in the AE thread.  Sandstein  22:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Galassi}} and {{user|Voyevoda}} indefinitely topic-banned from the Battle of Konotop article, because of revert-warring and generally unconstructive conduct on its talkpage. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:17, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
• Blocked 1 month for breach of topic-ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Voyevoda&diff=436876979&oldid=426221374]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|The Four Deuces}} indefinitely topic-banned from articles, and talk pages, which relate to minority peoples of the Soviet Union. User:Fred Bauder Talk 15:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

:*Ban was lifted by an [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=428443984&oldid=428442795 appeal at AE]. TFD is urged to heed the warnings about disruptive editing stated by a number of admins in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=428443984&oldid=428442795#Result_of_the_appeal_by_The_Four_Deuces Result section of the appeal]. EdJohnston (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Mibelz}} is banned for three months from changing names of people, places or things in Eastern Europe from one national variant to another. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMibelz&action=historysubmit&diff=429905313&oldid=429619024 Notified on his talk page]. Result of a complaint at WP:AE. EdJohnston (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
• For extensive sockpuppetry to evade his topic ban, as confirmed by checkuser, {{user|Jacurek}} is blocked indefinitely, the first year of which block is made under the authority of #Discretionary sanctions, above. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jacurek&oldid=434265934]. T. Canens (talk) 17:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Nmate}} blocked for three days for a personal attack made in an AE request ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=439149762#Result_concerning_PANONIAN]). --Mkativerata (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Smith2006}} is blocked for one year, and is indefinitely topic-banned from the subject of Eastern Europe, broadly construed, including both articles and talk pages. Both sanctions may be adjusted if the user will respond on their talk page and agree to change their behavior. Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=446427320&oldid=446424381 a thread at AE] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smith2006&diff=prev&oldid=446427894 a notice to the user]. EdJohnston (talk) 03:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
• For persistent battleground behavior after WP:ARBRB and apparent lack of intent to constructively contribute to encyclopedia building, {{user|Vlad fedorov}} is blocked indefinitely, the first year of which block is made under the authority of #Discretionary sanctions. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=449447678#Result_concerning_Volunteer_Marek AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 08:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Nmate}} blocked for 1 month for personal attacks, wikistalking and edit warring - see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C3%81nyos_Jedlik&diff=prev&oldid=453031647], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3_Medny%C3%A1nszky&diff=prev&oldid=453030560], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=B%C3%A1lint_Balassi&diff=prev&oldid=453030197] and the final [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATParis&action=historysubmit&diff=453210025&oldid=453096450 refusal to get the point]. Ironholds (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Igny}} topic-banned for six months for general battleground behaviour, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=454455685#The_Last_Angry_Man AE]. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|The Last Angry Man}} topic-banned for three months for general battleground behaviour, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=454455685#The_Last_Angry_Man AE]. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

:*The above two topic bans are modified to allow participation by Igny and TLAM in Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor. The mediators of that case have the exclusive prerogative of reporting any editorial misconduct by Igny or TLAM during the mediation to an administrator familiar with the topic bans or to WP:AE. If that administrator is satisfied that misconduct occurred by TLAM or Igny: (1) the modification to the topic ban for that editor will cease; (2) the topic ban for that editor will be reset and doubled in length and (3) the editors will lose the right to dispute the outcome of the MedCab case. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Samofi}} topic-banned indefinitely from all Hungarian-Slovak national and ethnicity issues, for continued tendentious battleground editing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Samofi&diff=456481582&oldid=456415011]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
• Sanctions all round after a particularly nasty bout of revert-warring on Ukrainians. See Talk:Ukrainians#Sanctions [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ukrainians&oldid=458191731#Sanctions] for more details and background.
• {{user|Voyevoda}} indefinitely blocked for long history of edit-warring and personal attacks.
• {{user|SeikoEn}} indefinitely topic-banned from all edits related to Ukraine, for a long history of tendentious editing and an aggressive national battleground attitude.
• {{user|Bandurist}} blocked 48 hrs for breach of earlier topic ban.
• {{user|Bandurist}}, {{user|Galassi}} and {{user|Lvivske}} placed under revert limitation: max 1rv/48hrs per article, with additional slow-down rule: must precede every revert by explanation on talk plus min.6hrs waiting period. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
• An appeal by Lvivske to WP:AE [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=602829754#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_Lvivske was unsuccessful].  Sandstein  07:07, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
• {{user|Omen1229}} topic-banned from all edits relating to Slovak-Hungarian history for a period of 6 months, due to a persistent history of ethnic battleground editing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Omen1229&diff=prev&oldid=461935972]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

• Certain material [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll&curid=563521&diff=414758741&oldid=414672602 removed] from the List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll article as an administrative action made explicitly under the authority of BLP special enforcement. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=414758869 this] for a more detailed explanation. T. Canens (talk) 09:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note that the material has subsequently been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_wars_and_anthropogenic_disasters_by_death_toll&diff=prev&oldid=415979449 readded] using phrasing consistent with the source. T. Canens (talk) 04:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
• Bert Cooper placed an indef semi after OTRS complaint and flagrant, beyond obvious BLP mess sat around for over a fortnight. Courcelles 09:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
• For edit-warring to violate WP:BLP after being [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Damiens.rf/Archive_2&oldid=422317764#BLP warned], {{user13|Damiens.rf}} is banned from edits related to living persons for three months for the reasons described [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Damiens.rf&oldid=422903418#April_2011 in this declined unblock request].  Sandstein  19:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user13|The-Expose-inator}} was topic-banned by Bishonen for 3 months until 23 Nov 2011, as listed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions&diff=prev&oldid=447566218 here]. - Mailer Diablo 03:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{User13|Garth M}} is indefinitely banned from editing Andrew Landeryou article and talk page. In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Andrew_Landeryou&diff=464463945&oldid=464385965 this edit], the user suggests a WP:COI and confirms it in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Garth_M&diff=464468312&oldid=464468139 this edit]. Issues involve warring and attempting to add negative information to the article using court records.--v/r - TP 04:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Asdfg12345}} is indefinitely topic-banned (as per WP:TBAN) from Falun Gong, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=415410047#PCPP this AE thread].  Sandstein  23:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|PCPP}} is topic-banned (as per WP:TBAN) from Falun Gong for four months, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=415410047#PCPP this AE thread].  Sandstein  23:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• Falun Gong placed under a 1RR/week restriction pending final disposition of a related AE request, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=456949915&oldid=456945960]. T. Canens (talk) 08:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
• Restriction lifted as the AE request [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=459823864&oldid=459818930 has been closed]. T. Canens (talk) 16:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
• Per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=459823864&oldid=459818930 AE thread]:
• {{user|Olaf Stephanos}}, {{user|HappyInGeneral}}, and {{user|Dilip rajeev}} are each banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to Falun Gong, broadly construed across all namespaces, for a minimum of one year. After one year, and every six months thereafter, they may apply to have this sanction reviewed at AE. They may also appeal this sanction to AE once within the next year, and may appeal to the arbitration committee at any time. The topic ban shall remain in force until it is lifted on appeal.
• {{user|PCPP}} is banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to Falun Gong, broadly construed across all namespaces, for a minimum of eight months. After eight months, and every four months thereafter, they may apply to have this sanction reviewed at AE. They may also appeal this sanction to AE once within the next eight months, and may appeal to the arbitration committee at any time. The topic ban shall remain in force until it is lifted on appeal. T. Canens (talk) 16:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

*For the reasons explicated in much greater detail in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=427546361&oldid=427534545 this AE thread]:

:#{{user|Wee Curry Monster}}, {{user|Imalbornoz}}, {{user|Pfainuk}}, and {{user|Richard Keatinge}} are placed on the following restriction: they may not make any substantive edit to Gibraltar unless they have posted on Talk:Gibraltar explaining their proposed edit, and 48 hours have elapsed since the time of the posting, and no editor objected to the proposed edit. For the purposes of this restriction: "substantive edit" means any edit that is not purely a typo fix, formatting change, or an exemption to the 3RR rule; "object" includes any expression of opposition to the proposed edit, regardless of the reason behind the opposition.

:#The four editors listed above are further banned from starting or participating in any discussion concerning any events, occurrences, or incidents that occurred between 1600 AD and 1900 AD, if such event, occurrence, or incident took place in, or is otherwise related to, Gibraltar, broadly construed. This restriction applies to all namespaces and all pages.

:#Violations of either of the above restriction will result in an immediate ban from Gibraltar and its talk page, as well as any further sanctions an uninvolved administrator may choose to impose.

:#Any uninvolved administrator may, for good cause, grant an exemption to the restriction in item 2 on a case-by-case basis. Such exemptions may be revoked if abused.

:#As an application of item 4, an exemption to item 2 is granted to all four editors as follows: item 2 does not apply to participation in a binding content RFC regarding their present disputes. The RFC is to be supervised by an uninvolved administrator, who may set such limitations as necessary to ensure the smooth progress of the RFC. Like all exemptions, this exemption may be revoked if abused.

:#Restrictions 1 and 2 will be lifted upon the conclusion of the content RFC referred to in item 5, provided that such RFC yields a consensus on the wording to be used, and the editor accepts the outcome of the RFC and conform their future edits to it. They may not attempt to change the outcome except by initiating a new RFC no less than one year after the original RFC concludes.

:#All involved editors are warned in the strongest terms that disruption of the RFC process, in whatever form, will be viewed with great disfavor, and will lead to sanctions up to and including a lengthy block and/or topic ban.

:T. Canens (talk) 08:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

::The above restriction, placed by T. Canens in May 2011, has been lifted on appeal per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=519872441&oldid=519870802 this AE discussion]. EdJohnston (talk) 03:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

• {{user|Eddie1kanobi}} blocked for 24 hours for breaking 3RR. Magog the Ogre (talk) 14:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Mactruth}} indefblocked for persistent, long-term battleground mentality after previous warnings/sanctions (specifically in this case using their user page to further ethnic conflict; see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=408440256#User:Mactruth perm. link to ANI thread]). EyeSerene^talk 19:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Eddie1kanobi}} blocked for indefinitely for severely disruptive editing. Socks blocked as well: :Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Eddie1kanobi. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
• For persistent disruptive and tendentious editing incompatible with the purpose of Wikipedia, {{user|AP1929}} is
• blocked indefinitely, the first year of which block is under the authority of #Discretionary sanctions, above, and
• banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions and other content related to the Balkans, broadly construed, as specified in WP:TBAN.

:See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=410105188]. T. Canens (talk) 04:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Hxseek}} indefinitely prohibited from reverting any edit on {{la|Ancient Macedonians}} and placed on indefinite 1RR restriction for all other articles within the scope of this case. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|VJ-Yugo}} blocked for 48 hours for battleground mentality/edit warring across multiple articles (mainly 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia) EyeSerene^talk 10:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|VJ-Yugo}} blocked for 2 weeks for continuing previous edit war upon release of block. Editor now subject to 1RR per week on all ARBMAC related topics. Toddst1 (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|VJ-Yugo}} blocked for indefinitely for continuing the exact same behavior that caused the previous block. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:42, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|John Gradwell}} blocked 24 hours for edit warring on Chetniks.Fainites ^barleyscribs 09:21, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Athenean}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Athenean&diff=420194536&oldid=420083804 indefinitely banned] from interaction with {{user|ZjarriRrethues}} and cautioned that future disruption may result in a topic ban, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=420192170#ZjarriRrethues AE thread]. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|ZjarriRrethues}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZjarriRrethues&diff=420194745&oldid=420026810 subject] to the same interaction ban as {{User|Athenean}} above, as a result of the same AE thread. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|DIREKTOR}} and {{User|Timbouctou}} blocked 24 hours for edit-warring on Croats. Eight reverts each in 24 hour period. Fainites ^barleyscribs 22:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Tankman786}} indefinitely blocked as an obvious sock puppet {{user|VJ-Yugo}} was using to evade his block and continue edit warring [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tankman786&diff=prev&oldid=420954546] Nick-D (talk) 10:03, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Anonimu}} warned per the result of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=422948261 this AE request] not to edit war. He is still under a WP:1RR directly from Arbcom, and his edits on Balkan topics are covered by WP:ARBMAC. EdJohnston (talk) 01:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|DIREKTOR}} topic banned from all yugoslav/balkans articles, broadly construed, for 1 month, until 17.35 9th May 2011, for WP:DISRUPT and WP:OWN. Fainites ^barleyscribs 16:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|John Gradwell}} blocked for one week for edit warring and disruptive editing. Was blocked and warned earlier.Fainites ^barleyscribs 09:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Meliniki}} and {{user|94.209.255.110}} blocked for a day for revert warring. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|DIREKTOR}}'s topic ban extended to a complete topic ban until expiry on 9th May 2011.Fainites ^barleyscribs 17:16, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|LAz17}} topic ban modified, see above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Vujacicm}} indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing. Toddst1 (talk) 17:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Slovenski Volk}} was given a 0RR sanction [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slovenski_Volk&diff=411023756&oldid=411020041 here] by HJ Mitchell and was blocked 72h on Jan 30, 2011. For breaking that sanction and using an IP to continue their edits, I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Slovenski_Volk&diff=433599323&oldid=433589770 blocked] Volk for 1 week. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|MefistofeliX}} indefinitely blocked after warning. Nothing but unsupported, nationalist, warring edits on Balkans articles.Fainites ^barleyscribs 23:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Kushtrim123}} (formerly {{User|I Pakapshem}}) – Blocked 1 month for violating topic ban. User is a reincarnation of I Pakapshem, who was indefinitely topic banned from all article involving Albania and Greece, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=369822502#I_Pakapshem]. –MuZemike 21:47, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|DIREKTOR}} topic banned for 6 months from 5th August 2011 for WP:TEND, WP:DISRUPT, WP:OWN.Fainites ^barleyscribs 20:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

:*DIREKTOR's ban was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DIREKTOR&diff=445407317&oldid=445244884 lifted on appeal] due to a procedural defect, without prejudice to a new ban request being filed at AE. EdJohnston (talk) 22:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

• {{User|Alan.Ford.Jn}} blocked 1 week for edit warring unsupported allegations into Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka after warning {{diff|User talk:Alan.Ford.Jn|445263991|445228198|here}}. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
• National Liberation War of Macedonia placed on 1RR restriction. EyeSerene^talk 09:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Nipsonanomhmata}} banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Balkans, broadly construed across all namespaces, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=451537254&oldid=451533696 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Dinner for three}} banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Balkans, broadly construed across all namespaces, for six months. The topic ban is consecutive to the indefinite username block applied to the account. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=451538295&oldid=451537995 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 18:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Kubura}} topic-banned for 6 months from all article edits to topics related to the breakup of Yugoslavia and the Yugoslav Wars, for persistent tendentious editing. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKubura&action=historysubmit&diff=455560118&oldid=449416674]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user |Majuru}} blocked 48 hours for blanking of Timeline of Kosovo history Toddst1 (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Macedon-40}} blocked 1 week for sockpuppeting on a Macedonia article; see the SPI case. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|LAz17}} indefinitely blocked for violating [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LAz17&diff=426504643&oldid=426450212#Hej unblocking deal] recorded above on 01:40, 4 May 2011. Violation was edit warring on Yugoslav Partisans See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=466908414#protection_request ANI discussion] for more info. Toddst1 (talk) 20:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

• Semi-protected Hummus for 1 year due to frequent disruption and POV-pushing by new/anonymous accounts. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Lihaas}} mandated to discuss all reverts to {{la|Hezbollah}} indefinitely with a review in one month as of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lihaas&diff=409078233&oldid=409053591 this notification]. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|GHcool}} blocked 55 hours for second 1RR violation at Hezbollah. Courcelles 18:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GHcool&diff=prev&oldid=409702038 Topic banned] for two months from expiry of above block per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=409684867#Result_concerning_Supreme_Deliciousness consensus] at AE. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
• Topic ban lifted after one month per request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Supreme Deliciousness}} blocked 24 hours for 1RR violation at Hezbollah. Courcelles 18:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Supreme_Deliciousness&diff=prev&oldid=409701715 Topic banned] for two months from expiry of above block per the same AE thread as GHcool above. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
• Topic ban lifted after one month per request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Koakhtzvigad}} topic-banned from the Israeli-Arab conflict for two weeks, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=412611578#Koakhtzvigad this AE request].  Sandstein  22:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Shrike}} banned for 3 months from editing any P/I article, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=414869206#Shrike this] WP:AE thread. AGK [•] 00:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Passionless}} banned for 3 months from editing any P/I article, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=414869206#Shrike this] WP:AE thread. AGK [•] 00:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• The two sanctions above, with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timotheus_Canens&diff=415034704&oldid=415015467 AGK's explicit agreement], are replaced with the following:
• {{user|Shrike}}:
• is banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces, until 00:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC), and thereafter banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions and other content related to Refaat Al-Gammal, broadly construed across all namespaces;
• is limited to one account (the account "Shrike"), and may not edit using any other account, or while logged out;
• is indefinitely limited to one revert per page per 168 hours on all articles and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces.
• {{user|Passionless}}:
• is banned from all articles, discussions and other content related to Refaat Al-Gammal, broadly construed across all namespaces, until 00:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC);
• is limited to one revert per page per 168 hours on all articles and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces, until 00:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC). Superseded by topic ban, see below. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
• See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=415039547&oldid=415034257#Result_concerning_Shrike AE thread]. The one-week blocks on {{user|Shrike}} and {{user|Passionless}} imposed by AGK remains in effect. T. Canens (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• The 1RR/week restriction and the topic ban on {{user|Shrike}} are lifted, effective immediately. T. Canens (talk) 23:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Jiujitsuguy}} is topic-banned from the area of conflict for six months, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=417075579#Result_concerning_Jijutsuguy this AE thread].  Sandstein  13:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

:*Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJiujitsuguy&action=historysubmit&diff=439027181&oldid=437205277 this notice], Jiujitsuguy's existing topic ban is extended by two months under the original terms, which per WP:TBAN include talk pages. The revised expiry date is 4 November, 2011. EdJohnston (talk) 04:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Emmanuelm}} is topic-banned from the area of conflict for two months, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=417268281&oldid=417265792 this AE thread]. The ban includes talk pages. EdJohnston (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Drsmoo}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drsmoo&diff=prev&oldid=418650946 blocked] for 72 hours for move warring. - 2/0 (cont.) 18:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|The Sham}} is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Sham&diff=prev&oldid=419703170 banned] from List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2011 for a period of one year per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=419694968#The_Sham AE thread]. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:16, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Sham&diff=prev&oldid=420852605 Blocked] 1 week for violation of the above and ban reset. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Mbz1}} ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=422812510&oldid=422812017])
• is topic banned until 2012-04-07;
• is indefinitely interaction banned with respect to Passionless. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
• is limited to 0RR and restricted from proposing articles to WP:DYK (see full text [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mbz1&diff=438783414&oldid=438634298 here]). - 2/0 (cont.) 18:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Passionless}} ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=422812510&oldid=422812017])
• is topic banned until 2012-04-07;
• is indefinitely interaction banned with respect to Mbz1. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Tgandz}} - [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tgandz&diff=424564968&oldid=424474142 blocked] 24 hours for personal attacks and battlegrounding. - 2/0 (cont.) 21:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|AndresHerutJaim}} is blocked 1 week for disruption and edit warring across a wide number of articles today. [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAndresHerutJaim&action=historysubmit&diff=425294336&oldid=425293824] Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Talknic}} is banned for three months from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed, including talk pages, per the result of an AE discussion. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATalknic&action=historysubmit&diff=426999572&oldid=426618323 Notified]. EdJohnston (talk) 03:11, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Debresser}} and {{user|Chesdovi}} are topic banned for 72 hrs due to disruption and edit warring. [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChesdovi&action=historysubmit&diff=427001218&oldid=426961385] [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADebresser&action=historysubmit&diff=427001201&oldid=426988781] Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|JonathanGo}} banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=427702893 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Passionless}} blocked one week for violation of interaction ban at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=428093486], see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=428105086&oldid=428100777 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 17:18, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Nableezy}} banned until 10 July 2011 from editing any P/I article, in connection with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=428474639#Nableezy this] AE thread. AGK [•] 20:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

:* Topic-ban of {{User|Nableezy}} vacated by discussion, and replaced by a revert restriction with the terms set down [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nableezy&oldid=433459771#Restriction_of_your_account_is_modified_as_follows here]. This sanction expires at the same time as the vacated ban would have, so on 10 July 2011. AGK [•] 22:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Gilabrand}} blocked indefinitely for persistent evasion of AE sanctions and continued disingenuous response; the first year of this block is an AE block made under the authority of #Discretionary sanctions. See [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=430904012&oldid=430898742 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
• [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment&oldid=443831618#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_Gilabrand ArbCom motion] provisionally suspends the AE block to Gilabrand as of Aug 25 2011. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 15:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Supreme Deliciousness}} banned until 00:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC) from editing any P/I article, in connection with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=431562366#Supreme_Deliciousness this] AE thread. AGK [•] 23:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Lutrinae}} banned until 11:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC) from editing any I/P page, and from then until 11:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC) from editing any I/P page from any account other than his primary account, in connection with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALutrinae&action=historysubmit&diff=433017226&oldid=433008918 this] AE thread. AGK [•] 11:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

:*Two rangeblocks [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEdJohnston&action=historysubmit&diff=439261856&oldid=439218607 issued here] due to Lutrinae's violation of the above ban. EdJohnston (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

:*Lutrinae went on to violate his topic ban using his registered account, so he's been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALutrinae&action=historysubmit&diff=439364702&oldid=433017226 blocked] for one month. This block can be lifted if he agrees to follow all relevant policies and restrictions. EdJohnston (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

• {{User|AgadaUrbanit}} banned until 19 December 2011 from editing any I/P page, in connection with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=435154409#AgadaUrbanit this] request for enforcement. AGK [•] 21:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC
• The above ban on AgadaUrbanit is suspended indefinitely. AE thread--Tznkai (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Nableezy}} prohibited until 27 December 2011 from interacting with {{User|Cptnono}}, in connection with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=436577452#Cptnono this] request for enforcement. AGK [•] 22:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
• {{User|Cptnono}} prohibited until 27 December 2011 from interacting with {{User|Nableezy}}, in connection with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=436577452#Cptnono this] request for enforcement. AGK [•] 22:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Chesdovi}} banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces, for one year, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=436820202&oldid=436816007 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 09:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Reenem}} banned from all articles and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all non-Talk namespaces, for three months. Reenem is allowed to participate in discussions related to the topic area. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=440695673&oldid=440636923 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 18:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Prideful}} blocked indefinitely by Zero0000 shortly after making first edits all changing "city" to "settlement" in the ledes of articles on Arab towns in the West Bank from account [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Prideful created two and a half years earlier]. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|ZionistSufi}} blocked 1 month and topic-banned for 6 months, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AZionistSufi&action=historysubmit&diff=446674245&oldid=446650004 this notice], after a discussion at AE. EdJohnston (talk) 17:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Someone35}} banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Middle East, broadly construed across all namespaces, for a period of no less than 3 months. The ban may be appealed to AE every 3 months, or to the Arbitration Committee at any time, and will stay in place until it is successfully appealed or lifted by the Arbitration Committee. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=446948181&oldid=446943426 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 09:25, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

:*Modified on appeal [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=448576556#Result_of_the_appeal_by_Someone35] - topic banned for three months fixed period from Arab-Israeli conflict anywhere on the project. Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|NoHasbaraHere}} blocked indef for username violation and clear POV-pushing in applicable articles. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Hearfourmewesique}} blocked 2 weeks for 1RR violation, per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=455422689&oldid=455422594 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Modinyr}} placed under a 1RR per week restriction from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict anywhere on the project, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=457909745&oldid=457909352 an AE thread]. They are warned that this could be extended to a full topic ban if they continue to make reverts without appropriate discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 02:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Chesdovi}} and {{user|Debresser}} are under a six month interaction ban, along with a six month ban on edits having to do with naming issues concerning Palestine or Palestinian in both articles and talk pages, broadly construed. Breaches of these bans will be followed by a block of one month, swiftly lengthening to indefinite for any later breaches. Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChesdovi&action=historysubmit&diff=459195625&oldid=459071355] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADebresser&action=historysubmit&diff=459196282&oldid=459188247] for the wordings of these bans as posted to each editor. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
• Both blocked a month for interaction ban violations. T. Canens (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
• Golan Heights had a unique 1RR sanction placed on it in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles&diff=380098127&oldid=380069884 Aug 2010] which held the article to 1RR as well as required editors to discuss reverts. The talk page notice of this was inadvertently removed when the new P-I sanctions template was done per the Nov 2010 community decision on 1RR for P-I. This restriction is still in effect and I have reinstated the talk page notice for the restriction.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Golan_Heights&diff=463859330&oldid=463807630] --WGFinley (talk) 18:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

:*The Golan Heights discussion requirement was lifted on 29 November 2012 per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=525465479&oldid=525464060 consensus at WP:AN]. The 1RR remains in effect, since it applies to all ARBPIA articles. EdJohnston (talk) 13:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

• Irgun protected for 7 days due to edit warring, editors reminded of 1RR restriction on P-I articles.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Irgun&diff=465221505&oldid=465217009] --WGFinley (talk) 03:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Someone35}} banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces for one year, expiry 10 Dec 2012 per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=465246477&oldid=465246101 this AE report]. --WGFinley (talk) 06:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)}}
• :Ban reset per subsequent AE report below. --WGFinley (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
• {{user|Hearfourmewesique}} topic banned indefinitely[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hearfourmewesique&diff=466086250&oldid=466044434] per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=466077219#Hearfourmewesique AE report]. NW (Talk) 01:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|173.238.69.86}} Blocked for one month, for persistent disruptive and contentious editing and edit warring in relation to Palestine. Numerous efforts have been made to communicate with the user on this, and the user has previously been blocked for a short period. The user has made it abundantly clear that they have no intention of cooperating. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
• :Increased block to indefinite as result of Checkuser verification of socking. --WGFinley (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Epf}} banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces indefinitely per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=466620309&oldid=466614647 this AE report], confirmation of socking via anonymous editing in P-I space. --WGFinley (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Talknic}} banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces for six months per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=467773171&oldid=467757319 this AE request], with expiry on 26 June 2012. EdJohnston (talk) 16:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|VanishedUser314159}} (formerly ScienceApologist) is topic-banned from the topics of pseudoscience and fringe science for a year, for the reasons described in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=407929896#Result_concerning_Joshua_P._Schroeder this AE thread].  Sandstein  23:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|VanishedUser314159}} (formerly ScienceApologist) blocked for three days for violating above topic ban at RHETI. Courcelles 23:13, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
• For self-declared intent to circumvent the above topic ban, FT2's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ScienceApologist&oldid=255950123#IP_editing restriction] (also logged above), and Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Martinphi-ScienceApologist#ScienceApologist limited to one account through abusive sockpuppetry, {{user|VanishedUser314159}} (formerly ScienceApologist) is blocked indefinitely, the first year of which block is made under the authority of #Discretionary sanctions. Further, the topic ban above is extended to run indefinitely. The block will be lifted, and the topic ban reset to the original expiration date, when and if VanishedUser314159 provides credible reassurances that he will not engage in tactics designed to circumvent, evade, or game his topic ban. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joshua_P._Schroeder&diff=409111470&oldid=408743505]. T. Canens (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
• The indefinite block of this user, currently known as {{user|Previously ScienceApologist}}, having been lifted by [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=567904165#Discussion_about_unblocking_Science_Apologist community discussion], the topic ban is lifted for the reasons stated [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&curid=5149102&diff=568001558&oldid=568000826 here] retroactive to the time of the unblock. T. Canens (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
• {{user|Immortale}} topic-banned from articles and discussions relating to Aspartame for four months [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Immortale&oldid=413889787#Block]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Arydberg}} topic-banned from articles and discussions relating to Aspartame for three months [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arydberg&diff=prev&oldid=414148119]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• Topic ban on {{user|Arydberg}} renewed for one year, after resumption of the old soapboxing behaviour. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arydberg&diff=456431246&oldid=456414842]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:53, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Torsionfield}} (aka {{ipuser|213.233.93.182}}) blocked 1 month and topic-banned indefinitely from the topic of Torsion fields, for multiple forms of disruptive conduct (threats, ranting, tendentious POV-pushing, personal attacks, outing attempts). See ANI thread [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=416028984]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Ludwigs2}} blocked at 23:27, 8 March 2011 by {{u|Sandstein}} for 72 hours as a result of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WP:AN&oldid=417866404#QuackGuru_again_-_what_do_I_do_now.3F this AN thread].

:*Subsequently unblocked by {{u|Dreadstar}}, which led to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration Enforcement sanction handling.  Sandstein  08:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Aquirata}}, {{user|Petersburg}}, {{user|Costmary}}, {{user|Erekint}}, {{user|Apagogeron}}, and {{user|Gary PH}} are all banned from Astrology and related pages per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=419993685]. Moreschi (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
• Ban on {{user|Apagogeron}} partially rescinded: see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Apagogeron&diff=prev&oldid=421290955]. Moreschi (talk) 09:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Milikguay}} topic banned indefinitely for violating WP:BLP/WP:V on multiple pages in the topic area.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMilikguay&action=historysubmit&diff=437659845&oldid=434699026] NW (Talk)05:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|QuackGuru}} is banned from the topics of pseudoscience and chiropractic broadly construed for one year per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:QuackGuru&diff=441111231&oldid=439478010 this notice], as a result of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=441110372&oldid=441107978 an AE discussion]. EdJohnston (talk) 03:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Ludwigs2}} is banned from the topic of astrology broadly construed for six months per KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 13:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Jabbsworth}} indefinitely topic-banned from the topic of Aspartame and related discussions, per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jabbsworth&diff=prev&oldid=462814083]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 00:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|128.59.171.194}} is blocked for one year for evasion of an AE block and an AE topic ban from pseudoscience and fringe science. The IP is being used by User:VanishedUser314159 who was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AVanishedUser314159&action=historysubmit&diff=420483247&oldid=419747333 renamed in March2011] and is actually one of the listed parties of this case. Per an [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=465066067&oldid=465063710 AE discussion]. EdJohnston (talk) 04:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|128.59.171.194}} is blocked for one year for evasion of an AE block and an AE topic ban from pseudoscience and fringe science. The IP is being used by User:VanishedUser314159 who was[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AVanishedUser314159&action=historysubmit&diff=420483247&oldid=419747333 renamed in March2011] and is one of the listed parties of this case. Per an[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=465066067&oldid=465063710 AE discussion]. EdJohnston (talk) 04:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

:*{{user|128.59.169.46}}, {{user|128.59.169.48}} and {{user|128.59.171.184}} are all blocked for one year to enforce the decision in the case of VanishedUser314159. EdJohnston (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

• 19:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC) {{User|BT35}} blocked indefinitely by {{admin|LessHeard vanU}} for expanding edit war on to User talk:LessHeard vanU following short block and AE notification previously. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{userlinks|Miradre}} is [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Miradre&diff=438967479&oldid=438923759 topic banned] for three months (2011-10-11). - 2/0 (cont.) 20:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
• 19:04, 30 August 2011 (UTC) {{User|Miradre}} is {{diff|User_talk:Miradre|447530551|446363347|blocked}} for one month by Atama for editing Criticism of evolutionary psychology in violation of the topic ban.
• {{user|Editor75439}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Editor75439&diff=464078500&oldid=464075839 topic banned] indefinitely per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=464075162#Editor75439 this AE report]. NW (Talk) 18:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

:*Blocked for a week for evading their block using IP Contributions/91.122.93.70. NW (Talk) 21:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

• Courcelles 03:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC) blocked 92.37.9.164.

• {{user|$cieno $itter}} blocked indefinitely as a username violation. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|AndroidCat}} blocked for 1 week for violation of topic ban by HelloAnnyong - see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AndroidCat&diff=412453106&oldid=412191655 diff]. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 01:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Vexorg}} limited to 1RR for articles and talk pages in the area of conflict for six months from 2 March 2011 (after the expiration of an edit warring block) Courcelles 04:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Soxwon}} blocked 24 hours for edit warring. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Shurusheero}} banned from the 9/11 topic area, and the False flag article for continued pushing of fringe POV. Courcelles 13:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

{{NOINDEX}}

• {{user|Shurusheero}} blocked for one year for continued POV pushing without discussion. Courcelles 17:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
• {{userlinks|The Devil's Advocate}} topic banned from all 9/11 related pages (talk pages inclusive) for 30 days (through 30 Dec 2011) per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=463239751&oldid=463239088 this AE report], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Devil%27s_Advocate&diff=463239937&oldid=462058360 user notified]. --WGFinley (talk) 05:41, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
• :Blocked for 7 days for violation of TBAN [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wgfinley&diff=464250577&oldid=464237822] --WGFinley (talk) 18:46, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

• I have blocked the account of {{vandal-s|NinaGreen}} for one year. AGK [•] 21:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Zweigenbaum}} placed under 3 months topic ban, for continued repetitive advocacy on the SAQ talkpage amounting to disruptive filibustering. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zweigenbaum&diff=415224696&oldid=415102366]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• Blocked 48hrs for refusing to abide by the topic ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zweigenbaum&diff=prev&oldid=415281406]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• Blocked 55 hours as editor's first posts after the block were again in violation of topic ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&action=historysubmit&diff=417600785&oldid=417588574]. Dougweller (talk) 16:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|AdamBerg}} topic banned for a year. Yet another single-purpose advocacy account or possible sock/meatpuppet stepping in exactly where other disruptive accounts left off, outright refusing to heed content policies [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AdamBerg&diff=417061716&oldid=417061352]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:43, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
• While checking some new SPAs on the SAQ talk against parties involved in this case, I discovered {{user|TurquoiseMountain}} and {{user|NotRecommended}} who are clearly socks of {{user|NinaGreen}}. I have blocked those accounts indefinitely & reset the 1yr block on NinaGreen due to ban evasion. --Versageek 04:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
• A discussion of sock evidence about {{user|NinaGreen}}, in response to Versageek's statement, can be seen [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=420135808#Log_of_blocks.2C_bans.2C_and_restrictions here] in the page history. Any further discussion should go to SPI or to a noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
• The anon editor who most recently edited as {{ipuser|71.191.2.38}} (previously {{ipuser|71.191.7.125}}, {{ipuser|71.191.11.102}}, {{ipuser|71.191.1.240}} and other IPs shown in the page history of Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford) is topic-banned from all edits related to the SAQ and Edward de Vere, for persistent revert-warring. Relevant edits from his known IP range can be reverted on sight. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{ipuser|50.92.68.21}} was blocked by Jclemens for NinaGreen's evasion of this ban based on conclusive evidence from [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=421271153 this diff] found at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&oldid=421265752 this report]. User:TeleComNasSprVenNaSpSpecial:Contributions/TeleComNasSprVen 08:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|BenJonson}} banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Shakespeare authorship question, William Shakespeare, or Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, broadly construed across all namespaces, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=421903336&oldid=421895259 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
• Blocked 24 hours for failing to abide by topic ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AShakespeare_authorship_question&action=historysubmit&diff=422575589&oldid=422575437]. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Smatprt}} was warned [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASmatprt&action=historysubmit&diff=444623426&oldid=443447023 here] that his ban from the topic of Shakespeare includes talk pages. Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=444554536&oldid=444530586 a discussion at AE]. EdJohnston (talk) 13:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Knitwitted}}, topic-banned for three months, after edit-warring and related vandalism [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oxfordian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship&diff=prev&oldid=465913901]. Details here: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Knitwitted&diff=466181084&oldid=466167995]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
• Topic-ban reinstated indefinitely [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Knitwitted&diff=534684410&oldid=534287547]. – Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
• Blocked 2 weeks for repeated breach of topic ban. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Knitwitted&diff=prev&oldid=611492155] Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
• Blocked 1 year for repeated, persistent breaches of topic ban [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Knitwitted&diff=638707221&oldid=638654371] Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
• {{user|Smatprt}} blocked 72 hours for renewed disruptive editing. Details here: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smatprt&diff=466485851&oldid=462955565]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Neilduffy112}} placed under Troubles probation for three months for edit warring at Martin McGartland, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=417529141&oldid=417525262 this AE discussion]. EdJohnston (talk) 01:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Vitalsines}} blocked indefinitely. Started editing career by reverting User:O Fenian, then proceeded to edit war and make WP:POINTy changes of nationality to Martin McGuiness article and make disparaging comments directed at User:O Fenian - all of which indicated the editor was not inclined toward building the encyclopedia, but rather pursuing a POV. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Wessexboy}} blocked 24 hours for 1RR violation on Queen Elizabeth II's visit to the Republic of Ireland, and for making tendentious statements. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wessexboy&diff=429938794&oldid=429822607 Notified on his talk page] of the result of a discussion at WP:AE. EdJohnston (talk) 20:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Rms125a@hotmail.com}} warned of the possibility of Troubles probation per a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=430910049&oldid=430904610 report at AE] of a 1RR violation. He has agreed not to edit Troubles articles or talk pages for one month. EdJohnston (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Ifcp1}} blocked for 48 hours for edit warring on Irish football articles (mainly Linfield F. C.) re Ulster banner & historical sectarian issues. Placed on 1RR on all articles in this area. EyeSerene^talk 08:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Jonchapple}} placed on Troubles probation for three months by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJonchapple&action=historysubmit&diff=444821554&oldid=444054876 this notice], as the result of an AE discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|FreeSouthDerry}} blocked indefinitely based on first edit explicitly indicating disruptive intent, compounded by username. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Sven the Big Viking}} blocked indefinitely based on a pattern of disruptive and hounding edits that indicate likely sock- or meat- puppetry; and failing to abide by warnings and previous unblock agreements. Notified of block here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASven_the_Big_Viking&action=historysubmit&diff=450391222&oldid=448404356] Cailil ^talk 11:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|The Skywatcher and me}} blocked indefinitely based on a pattern of disruptive and hounding edits that indicate likely sock- or meat- puppetry after being notified of 'the Troubles' rfar ruling. Notified of block here[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThe_Skywatcher_and_me&action=historysubmit&diff=451745402&oldid=448406063] Cailil ^talk 11:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Domer48}} placed on Troubles probation for six months per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=452626397&oldid=452616041 AE]. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Mabuska}} placed on Troubles probation for two months per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FEnforcement&action=historysubmit&diff=452626397&oldid=452616041 AE]. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Jonchapple}} topic banned for a period of three months per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=456499251#Jonchapple AE].[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jonchapple&diff=prev&oldid=456500344 Notification] KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
• To clear out any uncertainty whether the 1RR rule persists following the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions&oldid=457661290 motion] that superseded "all extant remedies" of this case, "as amended and clarified", all articles could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland, are placed under an 1RR rule under the authority of #Standard discretionary sanctions. The 1RR rule shall be construed and enforced in a manner that is identical in all respects to the 1RR rule that existed before the motion was enacted. T. Canens (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Jonchapple}} blocked for a week for topic ban violation, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=458033248&oldid=458026252 AE thread]. T. Canens (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Jonchapple}} blocked for three weeks for topic ban violation, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=460066631#Result_concerning_Jonchapple AE thread]. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|FergusM1970}} topic-banned for three months, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=464410049#FergusM1970 AE thread]. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Jonchapple}} blocked for six weeks for another topic-ban violation; see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=464664166 AE thread]. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
• {{user|Carson101}} blocked for 3 weeks[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACarson101&action=historysubmit&diff=468606653&oldid=468570475] for continued battleground behaviour, harrassment and attempting to frustrate dispute resolution (mentoring) of another user. An indefinite interaction ban with regard to all edits by, discussions involving, and discussions about User:GoodDay is also being imposed--Cailil ^talk 15:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

• {{user|Littleolive oil}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALittleolive_oil&action=historysubmit&diff=409623305&oldid=409018665 topic banned for 3 months], tendentious editing NW (Talk) 21:02, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

:*An appeal to WP:AE against this sanction was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=411878198#Arbitration_enforcement_appeal:_Littleolive_oil unsuccessful].  Sandstein  23:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

• Per the result of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=422948261 this AE request], Anonimu is warned not to edit war. He is still under a WP:1RR restriction directly from Arbcom, and his edits on Balkan topics are covered by WP:ARBMAC. EdJohnston (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

1. Due to ongoing violations of the topic ban, the articles Actor model and Gödel's incompleteness theorems have been under a mixture of semiprotection and pending changes protection from 2010-2-15 to present. Noted at AE on 2010-11-28 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive74#Note_on_protections_of_computability-related_articles].
2. Due to overbearing comments from numerous IP editors, Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems semiprotected for one month starting 2011-1-22. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
3. Semiprotected Actor model for 3 more months; IP editors seem to have returned. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)