Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/¥€$

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|¥€$}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=¥€$}})

No indication of pass of WP:GNG or other criteria such as chart rankings. Sources are primary. nearlyevil665 19:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil665 19:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

• Keep - has two reviews from reliable sources cited in the article and also some coverage from [https://www.papermag.com/tommy-cash-yes-2621907264.html?rebelltitem=7#rebelltitem7 Paper] so I think that it just about meets WP:NALBUM. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
• Keep. The two secondary sources in the article alongside these [https://www.clashmusic.com/reviews/tommy-cash-%C2%A5%E2%82%AC other] [https://www.papermag.com/tommy-cash-yes-2621907264.html two] makes four sources, so it is a definite GNG/NALBUM pass. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 21:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
• Keep - In agreement with the previous voters. The nomination was made just 15 minutes after the article was created, and while the main editor was still sprucing it up. The creator should have finalized it in their sandbox first, but the nominator seems to have only looked at the then-current state of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.