Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Éric Danty

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 03:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Éric Danty]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Éric Danty}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Éric Danty}})

Fails WP:NFOOTY - the Division 2 was not professional until 1993. Doesn't really pass WP:GNG either. Paul Vaurie (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep - Passes WP:GNG. There is plenty of coverage on the individual on the internet [https://actu.fr/ile-de-france/meaux_77284/seine-et-marne-le-monde-du-football-a-meaux-pleure-eric-danty_36679502.html][https://www.leparisien.fr/seine-et-marne-77/avon-77210/eric-danty-voit-encore-plus-loin-06-04-2011-1395174.php][https://www.leprogres.fr/sports/2013/01/22/ce-ne-sera-que-du-plaisir]. Alvaldi (talk) 10:17, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep agree with Alvaldi that sources show GNG is met. GiantSnowman 18:38, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep - three reliable French news sources above giving in-depth coverage is enough for GNG in my view Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep 3 good sources long after his playing time. I'd assume that there'd be more in inaccessible historic newspapers. Nfitz (talk) 17:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep as it passes GNG. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 20:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.