Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Şule Kut

:{{la|Şule Kut}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete nn bio; an associate professor, no sources, so nn we don't know when or where he was born, what he has done other than his apparently current job; no significant coverage in RSes, fails WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

:Agree with User:Carlossuarez46. It seems like the article isn't going to be built up any more and it doesn't really say anything about the person.--Revanche (talk) 01:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Pete.Hurd (talk) 07:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

*Delete as per nom. --Crusio (talk) 09:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

• Strong keep apparently nobody bothered to look in Google & follow up the links. I find many of her publications, and a description of her career in a third party source. Turns out she's the chair of her dept, Dean of the Faculty of Economics, and Vice-Rector of Bigle University. (I think that's equivalent to University President in the US, and would make her almost automatically notable) . It's not a good idea to think that any article can't be developed further unless you have tried, made a thorough search, failed, and can document it. It is frequent to see careless out of date bio articles on academics. I'll add publications & refs. when I have a chance, but Vice-rector should be sufficient. . DGG (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per DGG. Looks notable. Hobit (talk) 21:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per DGG. Should have Googled myself earlier, DGG is absolutely right about verifying before you vote. --Crusio (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.