Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Klein
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. As WP:A10 (non-admin closure) Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Kyle Klein]]=
:{{la|1=Kyle Klein}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Kyle Klein}})
I am unable to find enough in-depth coverage of this young cricketer to meet WP:GNG. Seems WP:TOOSOON for an article. The most coverage I found was [https://www.cricbuzz.com/cricket-news/131372/kyle-klein-paul-van-meekeren-skittle-brittle-usa-in-a-low-scoring-encounter this] match report and a few non-independent sources like [https://www.hbs-craeyenhout.nl/index.php?page=3264&sid=1 1] and [https://www.hbs-craeyenhout.nl/index.php?page=3071&sid=1 2]. JTtheOG (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and Netherlands. JTtheOG (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- There's Kyle Klein, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kyle_Klein&action=history created in 2024] with the exact same content, and Kyle Klein (same title?) [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E2%81%A0Kyle_Klein&action=history created] today? How is that possible? BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- :The latter has a {{unichar|2060}} at its beginning. -insert valid name here- (talk) 20:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: the word joiner in the technical title (in the URL, it appears as {{tq|%E2%81%A0Kyle_Klein}}) means that this duplicate of Kyle Klein is a textbook A10 (this would be an implausible redirect, which factors into A10 eligibility). Kyle Klein (the one without the word joiner) can probably be sent to AfD itself with the same rationale as this nomination, but I offer no opinion or further comment there. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- :{{Ping|Wcquidditch}} Thanks for the catch. Should I withdraw this nom to clear the way for the speedy deletion? JTtheOG (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- ::{{Ping|JTtheOG}} I suppose you could, though it probably doesn't matter too much (if this iteration of the article is speedy deleted, that would result in this particular nomination being closed anyway). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:51, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.