Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Anime (2nd nomination)

:{{la|100 Anime}} ([{{fullurl:100 Anime|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Anime (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

One line stub about a non-notable book, tagged for notability since August with no edits since then, no references. Little context is given and everything said in this article is already stated in the article about the author Philip Brophy. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 16:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• Redirect: to Philip Brophy. Fails WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 01:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
• Delete: non-notable book WP:BK. JamesBurns (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
• Merge/Redirect to Philip Brophy. Fails WP:BK with only one review found, but author himself seems notable. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
• I'm not finding anything to show this is a notable book, but as Collectonian notes, the author is himself notable. Following past precedent and analogy with WP:MUSIC, non-notable works of notable creators should be merged to the creator's article: merge to Philip Brophy. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
• Merge since the author is notable, but not the book.じんない 01:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

::There really isn't anything to merge, this stub is a reprint of what is already on the author's page. I think a redirect is in order. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 18:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.