Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/16 Entertainment
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Alex Wilhelm. Sandstein 17:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
=[[:16 Entertainment]]=
:{{la|1=16 Entertainment}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=16 Entertainment}})
Its founder Alex Wilhelm is notable, but this company of his has no significant coverage in WP:RS. Hmr (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Companies. Hmr (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. CNMall41 (talk) 04:02, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing notable as sources do not meet WP:ORGCRIT. An WP:ATD could be a redirect to founder but that is assuming he is notable. There are also COI concerns and while those do not bear on the AfD, it would be appropriate to check notability on the founder as opposed to assuming he is. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Merge. I spit into the wind. Even the nominator agrees the founder is notable, and so there is commonsense need for a bluelink here to direct toward that article. Once again...these do not need to come to AfD. A merge request is the appropriate venue. Chubbles (talk) 04:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
::I, myself, like to live dangerously. lol. I took a close look and not so sure he does although I will not nominate it during this AfD so as not to seem bludgeoning. He has one in-depth piece in Billboard but it is part of 40/40. The rest seems to be mentions or routine coverage. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
:::I don't think 40/40 disqualifies the piece, other Billboard coverage is also strong. Maybe Alex Wilhelm is on edge of notability, I'm leaning more toward notable. There's reference spam here too - worth a major clean up. Hmr (talk) 18:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
::::I understand your contention and you may be right. I took another look and think I will take to AfD after this is over here. Again, don't want it to come across as disruptive. I basically see him on a bunch of lists but nothing I can find says he would be notable for being on such lists. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Alex Wilhelm - I don't see any worthwhile material in this article that isn't already in the Wilhelm article, so while I would normally suggest a merge, I don't see what it would accomplish in this case. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Alex Wilhelm - The topic itself unable to meet SIGCOV and unable to demonstrate notability of a company. CresiaBilli (talk) 06:26, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.