Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Valley Bank

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:05, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

=[[1st Valley Bank]]=

:{{la|1st Valley Bank}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/1st_Valley_Bank Stats])

:({{Find sources|1st Valley Bank}})

Not notable as per WP:COMPANY. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 11:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Speedy close. WP:COMPANY states that "Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." It appears this was not met, if that has been done, they a 2nd nomination may be pursued. –HTD 12:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Oh, so now you're just copy-pasting your comments. Could you actually provide any sources establishing this particular bank's notability? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 10:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Close/Keep AFD isn't used as a clean up, Also per HTD. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 18:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  • As I've stated before, this isn't a matter of cleanup. This is a matter of notability, or lack thereof. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 10:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep. The bank is notable given the sources; the nominator should have really tried harder. Seriously, there's [http://www.philstar.com:8080/banking/336907/philratings-grades-1st-valley-prs-rb this], [http://files.archive.rbapmabs.org/dvds/project-management/06annual/06annual_docs/VC-MonthlyHighlights/VC-2006/October2006Highlights.pdf this] and [http://www.philstar.com/banking/327369/1st-valley-bank-services-4000-micro-client this]. --Sky Harbor (talk) 09:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Given that the sources are all dated 2006, how come you didn't add them when you started editing this article in 2008? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 15:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment. The comments saying "Speedy keep" or "close" don't have actual speedy keep criterion. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 15:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - as with the other 20 banks. Incidentally to say to an "so now you're just copy-pasting your comments" and then do exactly the same illustrates the lack of care that behind this whole waste of bytes. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

:*Please keep your empty arguments and personal opinions to yourself. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 06:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.