Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 Silverstone Superbike World Championship round

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=2002 Silverstone Superbike World Championship round}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=2002 Silverstone Superbike World Championship round}})

A single event in a series. Fails GNG and EVENTCRIT. Souces are all primary, stats, nothing that meets SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject (this event) directly and indepth. Unneeded CFORK of 2002 Superbike World Championship season. No objection to a redirect, but Wikipedia is not a repository of sports stats, unless content has some context from IS RS content should not be merged.

I think all five articles currently in :Category:2002 Superbike World Championship season are similar enough with this article to merit consideration of a group deletion  // Timothy :: talk  20:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

:Here is the group nom:

:{{la|2002 Kyalami Superbike World Championship round}}

:{{la|2002 Monza Superbike World Championship round}}

:{{la|2002 Sugo Superbike World Championship round}}

:{{la|2002 Valencia Superbike World Championship round}}

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
• Redirect all to 2002 Superbike World Championship as they are not independently notable. Frank Anchor 15:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport, South Africa, Japan, Italy, and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
• Comment - Offline sources (at least 1) exist which someone interested in purchasing/who already owns may use to provide in-depth coverage of individual events of this championship. [https://www.abebooks.co.uk/9788887110319/Superbike-World-Championship-2002-2003-Porrozzi-888711031X/plp]. They can probably be summarized briefly enough to all go into the parent article, so a redirect might be good for now until the parent is large enough to re-split, but I definitely oppose hard deletion. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  15:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.