Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Maryland county offices elections

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=2006 Maryland county offices elections}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=2006 Maryland county offices elections}})

Although sources exist to fill out this article with the relevant candidates and results, I do not believe that these elections meet the general notability guidelines. I cannot find more than passing mentions of these elections in local news. The best in-depth source I could find was [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/elections/2006/general_montgomery.html this archived voter guide] from The Washington Post. Rocfan275 (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

• I am also nominating the following related pages because they have the same notability issues:

:{{la|2010 Maryland county offices elections}}

:{{la|2018 Maryland county offices elections}}

Rocfan275 (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Maryland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
• delete the lot as hardly anything here is a notable race, made obvious by the failure to fill much of the information in. Mangoe (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

:

:{{comment}} {{U|Daveplot}}, a longtime editor, created this series, but has been inactive as of late. Can I have a couple of days to review this? I know that a number of notable politicians from Maryland started out in county offices, for example, Angela Alsobrooks. Also, I hate to be that kid, but I don't see any notifications to the usual suspects. Bearian (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

• Rocfan275, when you nominate an article for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/etc.), please notify the article creator. It's easiest if you use Twinkle to tag articles for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• :Thank you. Bearian (talk) 02:44, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:

• Delete - thank you, {{U|Star Mississippi}} for holding this open. I'm going to treat this as if it's a Prod. Please note how few of the sections are sourced or even complete. I won't oppose a Draftify, if it's viable. Bearian (talk) 09:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.