Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Farnborough plane crash

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep (non-admin closure). Consensus asserts the criteria are met by the involvement of 2 notable people. WilliamH (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

=[[2008 Farnborough plane crash]]=

:{{la|2008 Farnborough plane crash}} ([{{fullurl:2008 Farnborough plane crash|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Farnborough plane crash}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails WP:N. Cessnas crash all the time. Only a handful of people were killed in this one, and for the two who have articles, it's quite sufficient to mention the manner of death in their respective biographies (which we already do). Biruitorul (talk) 04:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep - I specifically checked this out before creating the article. It is a notable crash that meets the WikiProject Aviation guidelines:-

General aviation/corporate aviation/private aircraft:

Accidents are generally not notable unless unusual circumstances are involved, notable people are involved (my bolding), or the incident/accident otherwise results in downstream changes to the industry or procedures. Note: momentary news coverage, which would not last beyond the immediate timeframe of the accident, does not confer notability.

In this case, there are two notable people involved - Richard Lloyd and David Leslie - so the article does meet the criteria above. The full text is available [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation/Aviation_accident_task_force#Notability_guidelines here] Mjroots (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep as per WP:AIRCRASH.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 05:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep The notability of those on board makes the crash notable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 08:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep, a plane crashing on a house in London is significant. Edward (talk) 09:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep the prominent location and notability of the casualties make this more notable than the average Cessna crash. Mazca (talk) 10:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep also in Italy this incident recived a media covarage due to the place where happened and the people involved.(User:Lucifero4)
  • Strong keep per WP:AIRCRASH. I see absolutely no way how a plane crashing into a house isn't notable and significant. Celarnor Talk to me 11:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - notable incident. Planes don't very often crash into houses and injure people on the ground. Canterbury Tail talk 15:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy snowball keep - has more than minor notability factors: had notable people on board, crashed into a house in London, manner of crash etc. -- Roleplayer (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.