Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Brisbane train crash

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cleveland railway station. With page author's consent. The Bushranger One ping only 22:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[2013 Brisbane train crash]]=

:{{la|2013 Brisbane train crash}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2013_Brisbane_train_crash Stats])

:({{Find sources|2013 Brisbane train crash}})

WP:NOTNEWS. Also fails WP:EVENT. Nothing notable about this at all.

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ...William 01:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William 01:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC) ...William 01:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep. Extraordinary crash into the ladies bathroom. Worldwide press coverage. NickSt (talk) 01:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nomination; this is a clear case of WP:NOTNEWS. This relatively minor accident should be noted in the article in whatever station this occurred at and possibly the Citytrain article, but it doesn't warrant its own article as its unlikely to be of any lasting significance. Nick-D (talk) 01:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete or Redirect to Cleveland railway station (where the crash occurred) which also covers this. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Redirect and Merge to Cleveland railway station. Unlike the Saltsjöbaden crash (where I argued keep), which garnered world-wide coverage and indeed is still generating coverage, this one hasn't, yet, moved into anything that doesn't violate WP:NOTNEWS - but the information would fit the railway station article. Lukeno94 (talk) 14:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Merge / redirect to Cleveland railway station per above reasoning. Seems pretty clear. --Lockley (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete or Redirect per WP:NOTNEWS, 2013 Brisbane train crash is not a good title for a redirect but if consensus is to redirect then thats fine too. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Ok! (as author). Was merged to Cleveland railway station with leaving a redirect. Thanks. NickSt (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.