Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24/7 Techies

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted CSD G11 - Once the promotional material was removed, the article no longer met the minimum criteria of CSD A7.. v/r - TP 13:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

=[[24/7 Techies]]=

:{{la|24/7 Techies}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/24/7_Techies Stats])

:({{Find sources|24/7 Techies}}

{{Not a ballot}}

Company already listed on http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/05/247-techies-remote-tech-support-startup-for-smbs-raises-600k-seed-round-led-by-500-startups/ So I guess, this will be enough to considered notable.

The article's notability as per WP:CORP cannot be ascertained. Amartyabag TALK2ME 07:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Note to closing adminitrator: Obvious sock-puppetry in keep votes. SPAs tagged. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 08:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

  • comment I agree that Techcrunch is a solid source, my concern is that it will fall short of the significant coverage criteria. Whitewater111 (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 00:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete : Not meeting the notability guidelines. Yawalapiti (talk) 04:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
  • keep : 24/7 Techies - The company has also been featured in several leading independent local newspaper articles including The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka){{cite news |first= |last= |title= SL IT startup 24/7 Techies raises Rs. 80 million in funding |url=http://www.sundaytimes.lk/121125/business-times/sl-it-startup-247-techies-raises-rs-80-million-in-funding-21158.html|work=The Sunday Times}} and The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka){{cite news |first= |last= |title= The first Sri Lankan company to be featured in Tech Crunch |url=http://www.ft.lk/2012/11/12/remote-tech-support-firm-247-techies-featured-in-tech-crunch/|work=ft.lk November 12, 2012}}. Kothwala (talk) 05:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC) Rukshan Kothwala — Kothwala (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete In depth coverage is lacking. One article (TechCrunch) which has been cut and pasted elsewhere is not enough. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. Blatant self-promotion of non-notable start-up company. Google searches turned up nothing but local, trivial or tangential coverage, far too insignificant to establish notability in accordance with any of our guidelines. Both newpaper articles seem to be more armchair journalism based on press releases rather than actual investigative reporting, and the mention in TechCrunch is far from being substantial. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 08:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete clear promo article. Lukeno94 (talk) 09:00, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - I concur with the established, non-sock, consensus that this is advertising by a startup. I would have even considered speedy deletion. Go Phightins! 11:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

==References==

{{reflist}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.