Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24translate

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mark Arsten (talk) 19:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[24translate]]=

:{{la|24translate}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/24translate Stats])

:({{Find sources|24translate}})

Non-notable company Jsharpminor (talk) 19:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 08:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Comment I would think that the nominator's argument is not justified by anything and is hence invalid. Please explain as to why it is non-notable. See WP:JNN and Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Thanks. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

:Isn't that a bit like asking me to prove that the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist? It's an argument to avoid in the discussion, not an invalid nomination. The burden of proof ought to be on anyone who thinks that this company is notable.

:All that notwithstanding, the most basic Google News search turns up exactly 2 articles. Immediately fails the extensive coverage under multiple sources test. Jsharpminor (talk) 19:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Comment - Considering that the article claims the company is Hamburg-based, it is not surprising that [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=24translate&oq=24translate&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i400.1027.1027.0.1200.1.1.0.0.0.0.66.66.1.1.0...0.0...1ac.InmB5t_Wq44#q=24translate&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=J75LULLkIKfC2wX344HgDg&ved=0CCIQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=15a45091121c456a&biw=1422&bih=706 Google News archives] provided several German sources. It is crucial that we search farther than English-based sources such as Google US if the company is not American. Granted, several of those sources appear to be press releases but I wouldn't know if they would be sufficient, considering that I am not fluent with German. However, other users are welcome to scan those articles for suitability. SwisterTwister talk 21:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.