Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2esae

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone wants to create a redirect they can. Wizardman 15:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[2esae]]=

:{{la|2esae}} ([{{fullurl:2esae|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2esae}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Doesn't satisfy the criteria specified here. Specifically, "The Hardest" has not been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. Aditya (talk) 17:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2esae||}}

  • Unsourced and non-notable per WP:ARTIST (is mentioned once, in passing, in the NTY article linked), so delete and redirect to Graffiti Research Lab. Unitanode 20:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
  • :Per Dcs's post below, I've added that I believe this article should be redirected to GRL. Unitanode 00:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge with Graffiti - graffiti art by its very nature resists the kind of coverage one needs for notability. The case is interesting (though likely non-notable) because it seems he was being made a case by New York - for whatever reason - and caused the Brooklyn graffiti community to fundraiser and rally on his behalf, to pay his legal fees which the artist describes as being debilitating. Also seems much of the press related to this is associated with his pals Graffiti_Research_Lab - who are notable enough. You sometimes see this, groups take on a cause, only to get press for themselves.... Whatever the case, he shouldn't have his own page, he's not notable enough in his own right. Deadchildstar (talk) 23:39, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.