Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/365mag
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
=[[:365mag]]=
:{{la|1=365mag}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=365mag}})
Non-notable "e-zine" publication. The article cites only the publication's own website, which is a dead link. The publication's LinkedIn page has only 20 followers and no posts. Its YouTube channel has 11 subscribers and 3 low-quality videos with very few views (two of which are the same 16-second video consisting of a person encouraging people to go to a website). Vimeo has a little bit more, but not much. A web search yields nothing else, except a similarly named unrelated publication called 365 Magazine. — BarrelProof (talk) 23:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
:{{re|BarrelProof}} thanks for providing a more in-depth deletion rationale than you did for your prod. ~Kvng (talk) 03:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Netherlands. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Came and left without making a lasting impact, just as nominator says. Kudos for nominating, good find! gidonb (talk) 15:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete BarrelProof says it all - very little trace of this exists, and it didn't have much attention in its time. Lamona (talk) 21:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.