Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3CX IP PBX

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[3CX IP PBX]]=

:{{la|3CX IP PBX}} ([{{fullurl:3CX IP PBX|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3CX IP PBX}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable software. Article only has one RS, couldn't find any other. BJ^Talk 02:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Clearly this software is notable, since the software has many references to it from other websites, substantial forum traffic 78.158.130.237 (talk)

He're are a few more 'RS' including ZDnet, tucows 5 star, hak5, Windows IT pro.

http://www.windowsnetworking.com/news/WindowsNetworking-Readers-Choice-Award-IP-PBX-Servers-3CX-Phone-System-for-Windows-Apr09.html

http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/3cx-free-sip-softphone.asp

http://www.voipplanet.com/solutions/article.php/3789951

http://www.revision3.com/hak5/WiiHax

http://www.smithonvoip.com/3cx-review/

http://www.msexchange.org/resource/3cx/ip-pbx-faqs/configuring-exchange-server-2007-unified-messaging-with-3cx-phone-system.html

http://www.tucows.com/preview/505609 (5 tucows stars)

http://www.voipsupply.com/3cx-enterprise-edition-3cxpsent-32sc (leading voip store)

http://www.itreviews.co.uk/software/s589.htm

http://bink.nu/news/3cx-launches-new-ip-pbx-for-windows-3cx-phone-system.aspx

http://www.zdnet.com.au/reviews/software/applications/soa/3CX-Phone-System-for-Windows/0,2000065797,339286202,00.htm?feed=pt_enterprise

http://windowsitpro.com/Windows/Articles/ArticleID/98321/pg/2/2.html

http://processor.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles%2Fp3043%2F11p43%2F11%5F%5F%5F12p43%2Easp&searchtype=&WordList=&bJumpTo=True

88.203.110.127 (talk) 17:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Weak Delete Article is written like an advertisement and original creator has a WP:COI. Needs independent rewrite with objective tone. Comments above are from newly created WP:SPA accounts. Some assertions claimed in the article come from citations that simply quote the company's CEO, hardly an independent, reliable source. Calltech (talk) 15:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

—Preceding undated comment added 12:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC).

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.