Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 things you should do in university

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow close. The consensus seems to be clear that at best this is an essay based upon a WP:NEOLOGISM that has yet to gain enough attention to be considered notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. That there are also concerns over potential copyright violations makes it even more of a reason to snow close this early. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[5 things you should do in university]]=

:{{la|5 things you should do in university}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/5_things_you_should_do_in_university Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|5 things you should do in university}})

This does not seam like an encyclopedic topic. This is simply not notable Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:NOTADVICE Jinkinson talk to me 12:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. This appears to be based on an non-notable article in a university publication. It's targeting Hong Kong universities, and is of dubious value even there. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete At best this is WP:NOTADVICE. At worst it might be a copyright violation. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. Kierzek (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTADVICE. --AmaryllisGardener talk 16:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete Neither a phrase often used by faculty nor a pamphlet distributed widely on campus are going to meet the WP:GNG except in the most unusual of circumstances. No indication that those exist. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.