Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/609th Air Communications Squadron
=[[609th Air Communications Squadron]]=
:{{la|609th Air Communications Squadron}} – (
:({{findsources|609th Air Communications Squadron}})
This squadron, performing a ground combat service support function, is not notable. Any relevant material can either be placed at Shaw Air Force Base or 20th Fighter Wing. This nomination is in line with previously determined community consensus over separate non-combat ground forces' companies (a unit at the same level). See eg Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/101st Chemical Company (United States) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/722nd Ordnance Company (United States). Buckshot06 (talk) 05:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Buckshot06 (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete A Google news search [http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=au&hl=en&q=609th+Air+Communications+Squadron doesn't] turn up any references about this unit and there's no reason to assume that its been the subject of significant offline coverage independent of the USAF. Nick-D (talk) 05:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete despite the claim of winning the "Meritorious Unit Award". No clear evidence of notability.--Prodigy96 (talk) 09:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete does not appear from the article to be notable appears just to be a support unit. MilborneOne (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: per nomination; does not seem to be enough coverage to satisfy WP:N as it stands. — AustralianRupert (talk) 00:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete not notable. (GregJackP (talk) 21:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC))
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.