Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/60 footed

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:47, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

=[[60 footed]]=

:{{la|60 footed}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/60_footed Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|60 footed}})

Non-notable neologism. PRODed under the same rationale, PROD removed by IP. I can find almost no uses of this term at all in the wild, and zero reliable sources using or discussing it. Kolbasz (talk) 17:14, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete: Strong delete as neologism, fad argot. Hithladaeus (talk) 17:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete: Even if there are sources, it's a dictionary definition. It could be a useful statement within an article about drag racing or street racing, but not a basis for its own article. Aspirex (talk) 04:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Non notable neologism. No references at all. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 00:16, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete per others, does not warrant its own article. Citobun (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.