Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.Veeramani

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Another administrator has already deleted the WP namespace redirect left over from the move. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

=[[A.Veeramani]]=

:{{la|A.Veeramani}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A.Veeramani Stats])

:({{Find sources|A.Veeramani}})

Does not appear to meet WP:PROF. PROD was removed by author. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment. The author has moved the article to the Wikipedia namespace and then moved the resulting redirect. An admin will have to sort this out. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. It is written in the first person, so does not even pretend to be an article. Imaginatorium (talk) 20:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. I moved it back to article space so that discussion here can continue. It looks like a cv rather than an article, so I think WP:NOTLINKEDIN applies, and it would also be inappropriate to have this in userspace. He has enough books published (even discounting the edited volumes) that there's a chance of collecting enough independent reviews of them to pass WP:AUTHOR or maybe even WP:PROF, but I doubt there's much worth saving from this autobiography. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. Little sign of impact on scholarly literature. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC).
  • Delete. It looks like this was copied from his CV. Like David Eppstein (talk) stated, this article would have to be completely overhauled to focus on his works. As it is, it should be removed. --Kbabej (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.