Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AO-65 assault rifle

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

=[[AO-65 assault rifle]]=

:{{la|AO-65 assault rifle}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AO-65_assault_rifle Stats])

:({{Find sources|AO-65 assault rifle}})

Fails WP:GNG - could not find WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Someone might need to check for reliable Russian sources. Ansh666 18:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Delete. Does not meet Wiki notability requirements. The main source of information on the internet for this firearm seems to be Wikipedia itself or a Wiki mirror.--RAF910 (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.