Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARRAY Magazine

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

=[[:ARRAY Magazine]]=

:{{la|ARRAY Magazine}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ARRAY_Magazine Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|ARRAY Magazine}})

I found no significant coverage for this magazine in multiple searches. SL93 (talk) 05:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete - The primary coverage in this article does not make a case for GNG.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete: The brief Editor at Large coverage as one of 8 similar publications does not in itself indicate notability and my searches are finding nothing to indicate that this publication from New York Design Center (which does not itself have an article, so no redirect possibility) is notable. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete. The article lacks notable content and lacks credible sources. Bmbaker88 (talk) 12:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete: No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.