Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASC CDL

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep but cleanup. Sandstein (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

=[[ASC CDL]]=

:{{la|ASC CDL}} ([{{fullurl:ASC CDL|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASC CDL}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable, seems a lot like original research Milk’s Favorite Cookie (Talk) 17:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep and wikify The article needs a lot of work and is by a new contributor. But has the nominator done any research at all to see if this subject might be notable before nominating this for deletion? Obviously not. Observe the search results on Google News [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?tab=sn&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=%22ASC+CDL%22&ie=UTF-8] and Google Web [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=%22American+Society+of+Cinematographers+Color+Decision+List%22&btnG=Search]. I strongly suggest that the nominator contact Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films for some expert input on this. Voceditenore (talk) 17:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep, needs third-party refs and a layman's rewrite. This is a budding standard promulgated by the American Society of Cinematographers for matching color through the camera, related to things like Pantone and CMYK definitions. There does seem to be [http://www.studiodaily.com/main/news/headlines/9385.html substantial] [http://www.postproductionbuyersguide.com/MTI-Film_04_10_08.php discussion] in the industry. --Dhartung | Talk 09:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per Dhartung, although as he says, it really needs to be rewritten. --JulesN Talk 09:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep: May have potential, but requires rewriting. Victor Lopes (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.